Now we can talk about those related to Epstein, Sandusky, Hastert, Saville and the recent busts but we can't talk about Comet, Alefantis, Podesta and any of their possible connections because well, there is nothing to see there. See? So, there aren't any weirdo baby pictures, with suggestive commentary about murder and shit. There isn't any of that really. It's completely normal. See? There aren't any suspicious businesses around either who happen to use pedo logos. Nope. Just a honey pot really. So you see, we shouldn't go there. Nothing to really investigate. No real relevant connections that would suggest an interest in children. And, well, we can't bust the DC ring you see. That one is untouchable and I have to back off now. But look over here, look, look. Nothing to see there....look over here.....there's nothing to seeeee....look over here....super male vitaliteee
view the rest of the comments →
HugoWeaving ago
I disagree with your translation. In fact, I think Alex was telling us exactly who to look at.
The "apology" letter is standard practice in defamation legal suits. After being contacted by Alefantis, Infowars did exactly what every media company does when sued for libel -- draw the distinction between what they reported and what they "commented" on, back off without retracting anything, and then confirming their stance on the issue.
If Alefantis was CIA, or even if he wasn't and has turned on his teammates, he is a protected asset now. Those leads have been investigated and documented. The research is in the right hands.
As for who to haunt next...Epstien, Sandusky, Podesta, Silsby, Clinton, Weiner, Huma...Alex told us who to investigate.
THAT's what Alex Jones is saying...
SayWhatNOWAY ago
Really? People who have already been looked at? Epstein and Sandusky in or all ready served time. Silsby charged but now working at the Amber Alert place. Clinton investigated soo many times I have lost track! Weiner and Huma shopping around for immunity! Yeah, lets just keep circling the drain!
uuuuuuuuuus ago
just like he finally says he knew the prime minister was a pedo years ago.. but only says it after the story leaked in msm. he makes up for this by adding that the pm also slit the throats of children, which wasn't reported in msm.
V____Z ago
I don't suppose he provided a source for that throat slitting claim? Even tonight, trying to defend his empire, he bragged about how he reported on various things - ALL OF THEM were widely reported by the lamest of mainstream media. what's there to brag about?