Translation of what Alex Jones is saying... (pizzagate)

submitted ago by sentryseven

Now we can talk about those related to Epstein, Sandusky, Hastert, Saville and the recent busts but we can't talk about Comet, Alefantis, Podesta and any of their possible connections because well, there is nothing to see there. See? So, there aren't any weirdo baby pictures, with suggestive commentary about murder and shit. There isn't any of that really. It's completely normal. See? There aren't any suspicious businesses around either who happen to use pedo logos. Nope. Just a honey pot really. So you see, we shouldn't go there. Nothing to really investigate. No real relevant connections that would suggest an interest in children. And, well, we can't bust the DC ring you see. That one is untouchable and I have to back off now. But look over here, look, look. Nothing to see there....look over here.....there's nothing to seeeee....look over here....super male vitaliteee

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

HugoWeaving ago

I disagree with your translation. In fact, I think Alex was telling us exactly who to look at.

The "apology" letter is standard practice in defamation legal suits. After being contacted by Alefantis, Infowars did exactly what every media company does when sued for libel -- draw the distinction between what they reported and what they "commented" on, back off without retracting anything, and then confirming their stance on the issue.

If Alefantis was CIA, or even if he wasn't and has turned on his teammates, he is a protected asset now. Those leads have been investigated and documented. The research is in the right hands.

As for who to haunt next...Epstien, Sandusky, Podesta, Silsby, Clinton, Weiner, Huma...Alex told us who to investigate.

THAT's what Alex Jones is saying...

birthdaysuit11 ago

Alefantis is the fall guy and the easiest one to break.

EndOfTimes ago

Holy shit https://vid.me/KGN0

GhengisPlan ago

OMFG https://vid.me/NacV

GeorgeT ago

There was no law suit. I refer audience to Jacke Morphoneus (End Times Report) law suit posted here. He got legal papers from the Maccoby and Jacke showed us how he handled it. He clearly outlined the fact that damaging information is not defamation or libel. Creepy instagram photos are real! Pedo logos are real! Silsby-Maccoby-Alifantis connections are real. Like Jake said, it was intimidation - and may I dare say, threat to his or his family's life. No law suit there, 0% chance. If Podestas and Alifantis were innocent they would have made it known months ago. Hulk Hogan sued web company out of existence for doing 1/10000000 as much. Does anybody believe in what Jone's is saying. But it could be even more sinister than we think, is it far fetched that Alex was bribed by the Rotchilds, say a cool 100 million if he would apologize publicly? Think about that. Alex could not give a damn about anything. Go Alex, sneak in to Bohemean Grove and tell us about it. Pathetic.

44NJ9 ago

exactly, my feeling is AJ Pork Rind is cointelpro or got paid out, not threatened to be sued. He's the F'n honeypot, you'll watch his bloated, screaming face and get distracted. He just single handily tried to DESTROY this movement. Him apologizing on Friday really hurt Saturday's march. D. Seaman screams about Podesta being a pedo everyday. He's not waving papers around. That pity little message on Monday for AJ Pork Rind didn't get picked up by major news, did it? Hate to break some hearts but Fat Boy Pork Rind is detrimental to this fight.

HugoWeaving ago

What if certain people were finally told that Alefantis was an operative -- or if he has turned state and is naming-names...? I am not disputing your claims, merely suggesting that there are alternative ways this could all play out. Time will tell. Or it won't.

GeorgeT ago

I would believe that if Alifantis did not look like a total psychopath. I believe he is also a cannibal. Look at his beady, souless eyes.

V____Z ago

Please tell me, assuming you're a regular watcher? What has Alex said that could get him sued? All i've seen is him defending Alefantis and trying to tsteer us away from the very beginning. Plus, the day after the actor supposedly shot three two one bullet into the floor computer hard drive, Alex had lawyer on his show, who was at Comet at the time of the "shooting", to tell his HARROWING story.

The thing is, Alex has never said he was being sued, and we have never seen proof that he was, or was being threatened. He could be leading us to assume this in order to help Alefantis or whomever controls him, to steer all of us away from looking in the right spot.

In all seriousness, do yo ubelieve Alefantis would go anywhere near a courtroom? Willingly? And if so, why hasn't he sued someone like David Seaman who straight up calls him a pedorapist to this very day. David has enough of an audience to warrant large mainstream media orgs to come after him, he's large enough for James to sue if there was a case.

I don't think Alex is telling the truth, but furthermore, he never actually said there is a suit. We didn't need Alex to tell us who to look at next - unless you're new here, everyone knows we have been looking at ALL these names EQUALLY.

44NJ9 ago

He might has well tell us how AJ bends him over at night and hides the salami. Hate the Fat Man.

HugoWeaving ago

Appreciate the critical thinking. And no, I'm not new here. What Alex DID say is he was contacted by Alefantis and asked to remove the 7 instances where his name was discussed. He had to make Infowars aware of which 7 pieces and why -- and I assume that was done thru his lawyers. You don't need to be SUED to react to defamation claims. A mere letter threatening specific action would be enough to warrant a response like he gave. Just saying...

GeorgeT ago

Many have aluded to this. Seaman actually calls out Podesta and Alifantis and nothing happens. ET Williams calls out James Comey and nothing happens. Is Alex Jones an MK Ultra? Just speculation, I am just asking. I have never seen Alex apologize.

44NJ9 ago

Fat Boy Pork Ring is definitely not MK Ultra, I think they have sex a lot, who could ever send him in as a sexual honey pot? Maybe CIA conintelpro, not MK Ultra.

GeorgeT ago

I figured. He is an actor. Cointeloro.

20Justice4All17 ago

Agreed...his reach is a double edged sword. David Seaman's latest video stays on point. Becoming more of a fan of DS

V____Z ago

I'm no 'fan' of David, but the shills attacking him have forced me to be his defender. I've followed David since 2012 and he is truly on the up and up. He speaks truth even if his voice shakes, even if it will get him fired or worse. He's kind of an autist in that way, as am i. We don't fit in, but i suggest this type of autist is a much better source for the truth than a skilled, red faced screaming actor like Alex Jones.

20Justice4All17 ago

In a way, it's good AJ has done this. A lot of folks will say bye bye now. The money got to him.

V____Z ago

Yes, i've been celebrating ever since he made his big speech about leaving pizzagate alone. For numerous reasons.

micha_ ago

He says, focus on what can be proven, all the lower minions will follow.

And while I think about it, I must applause him: What are the FACTUAL links to Alefantis being a child trafficker? Spirit cooking and "pizza party" and sick instagram pics? I am a bit embarassed about myself, because I never noticed how weak the link to Alefantis really was.

Not enough for an investigation. Circumstances may be overwhelming, everything may seem to fit, but for a legal case there must be facts. Being caught with a child. A child accusing someone. Video evidence. Such things.

For example I think the Podesta emails are much stronger. And Alex mentioned the Podesta emails.

Focusing on CPP and Alefantis: 1. Based on what? What evidence? 2. In what way does that get to the global network? To the top?

Contrary to that: Podesta emails, Silsby, Clinton, Epstein.

samhara ago

I don't really give a fuck what that fuck-face says.

Is he some Oracle? NOT.

micha_ ago

For twenty years he has been an oracle.

HugoWeaving ago

Agreed.

GeorgeT ago

Evidence: Here is evidence - Laura Silsby was convicted of trafficking 33 children out of Haiti, Daily Mail 2010. Silsby procured children from the very orphanage run by Max Maccoby - The lawyer who represented Alifantis in a blackmail case involving David Brock and a third party. Max's Father Michael Maccoby rallied behind Alifantis against ANC comissiner Frank Winsted in 2008 who implicated CPP in shady activities. Silsby was freed thanks to the Clintons who hired a notorious child trafficker Jorge Pierlo wanted in 5 countries. So lets draw connections: Silsby - smuggles kids out of Orphanage run by Max Maccoby - who represented Alifantis in a Blackmail case - Now, what are the chances that Silsby would smuggle children out of the same orphanage run by a man who represented Alifantis in a law suit, and whose Father actively campaigned for CPP to stay open late hours? This comment was not intended for you (you already shilled me once) this is for all the newcomers. Beware un-informed people who lead you astray. CPP and Alifantis (super high level operative) was never based on some instagram photos alone. Jacke Morphoneus was hit with a law suit for exposing exactly what I just outlined. Look at how Jacke handled it. He said he would counter sue - and force all implicated in the open court, Silsby, Alifantis, Maccobys and the Clintons.

micha_ ago

Only connections, no indications of a crime. Representing someone in a case is not a crime. Guilt by company?

The Podesta emails, where kids were sent to a pool for entertainment, have a totally different quality, for example.

And btw, it's much easier to convince people by telling them about Saville and other pedophiles, instead of talking about Alefantis or CPP.

I was not convinced because of CPP. CPP followed LATER. At the beginning were the Podesta emails. Then Lolita express. Haiti and Silsby. NOT YOUR STUPID COMET PING PONG!

Alex Jones is spot on once again and has understood with Alefantis and CPP nobody can be redpilled. In fact the opposite happens by talking about a pizzaplace as centre of an incredible crime.

GeorgeT ago

Guilt by conpany - it's called Probable Cause. Circumstantial evidence which warrants investigation.

micha_ ago

Podesta emails, yes. Children into a pool can not be sold as "art". Alefantis connections are too weak. But by getting Silsby, Clinton, Epstein, Weiner and Podesta, Alefantis should come into focus, too.

GeorgeT ago

Silsby is linked to Alifantis via Maccoby

micha_ ago

If you write the name wrong I cannot take you seriously.

GeorgeT ago

I don't take trolls seriously anyway

GeorgeT ago

CPP was in the emails. It warrants investigation. Alifantis is a super high operative. Silsby - Maccoby - Alifantis connection. Investigation is based on leads and associations. The whole system is compromised, except now they have gotten careless. CPP is just one of thousands of fronts all over the world.

micha_ ago

The whole system may is compromised, but by speculating nothing can be achieved. It is necessary to catch child traffickers and rapists and that is not by looking in a pizzaplace, but by the already caught traffickers and their supporters.

GeorgeT ago

They are caught then let go! Law protects pedophiles, but just try not pay taxes!

FuckUredditFuckuSpez ago

and I thought I didn't like you...

Forgetmenot ago

So well said! Slam dunk.

Naspert ago

I disagree, any regular person would have been investigated in that situation. Normal rules don't apply to elites, that's the problem.

micha_ ago

Childporn is forbidden, but not making disgusting, suggestive photos of kids. So investigated in that case for what?

Podesta (or the Tamera Luzzatto kids) maybe could be investigated because of the email sneding them to a pool for entertainment of an adult.

ThePedoHunter ago

Why did he take down the Satanic pedo artwork?...why did he have it up in the first place? Why are bands talking about their sexual preference for kiddie fcking at his pizza joint? Why is a ghey man who hates kides and sexualises infants so connected to children welfare groups....blah blah blah

You shill mongrel

micha_ ago

In what way is disgusting "artwork" an indication of a crime? Non-pedophilic sick pics of kids is a crime? Where?! Your hysterical reactions to Alex Jones hopefully refocusing on the important things like the Clinton Foundation, international child trafficking, Epstein, the Podesta emails, show me, that you are no longer thinking logically what are the necessary steps to get the investigations going forward.

GhengisPlan ago

WTF OMFG https://vid.me/NacV

SayWhatNOWAY ago

Really? People who have already been looked at? Epstein and Sandusky in or all ready served time. Silsby charged but now working at the Amber Alert place. Clinton investigated soo many times I have lost track! Weiner and Huma shopping around for immunity! Yeah, lets just keep circling the drain!

uuuuuuuuuus ago

just like he finally says he knew the prime minister was a pedo years ago.. but only says it after the story leaked in msm. he makes up for this by adding that the pm also slit the throats of children, which wasn't reported in msm.

GhengisPlan ago

WOWOWOWOWOWOWOWOW JAJAJAJAJAJ

OMFG https://vid.me/NacV

SayWhatNOWAY ago

Just like Beck, Jones wants to be the first one to "break the story" He always says "you heard it here first folks" Remember when wikileaks was supposedly going to drop info on Hillary to end her campaign and put her in jail? Everyone stayed up until 3am waiting and nothing! Jones with Roger Stone was constantly saying "folks this is big, my sources have told me, that Hillary will be in handcuffs very soon" Now, oh he was the first one to say that the Comet PP story was a false flag! BS! Boycott this baboon!

V____Z ago

I don't suppose he provided a source for that throat slitting claim? Even tonight, trying to defend his empire, he bragged about how he reported on various things - ALL OF THEM were widely reported by the lamest of mainstream media. what's there to brag about?

V____Z ago

EXACTLY. Limited Hangout ftw

EndOfTimes ago

Tha fuq???? https://vid.me/KGN0

GhengisPlan ago

WTF OMFG https://vid.me/NacV

SHARE

huhWHAThuh ago

IF he is "a protected asset now," no amount of investigation can harm him. If he is CIA or was CIA, THEY are the chief suspects of the child trafficking networks at the bottom of all this. Either way, what Jones is saying is nonsense.

V____Z ago

At the end of the day, if someone proves that they will lie on camera (like saying Alefantis and his operation are perfectly innocent), and when those lies are specifically about pizzagate, then there is absolutely NO reason to ever use that person as a source for pizzagate ever again. It's not like we need his help. The most brilliant researchers are here and on Reddit. They do it for free. For the children.

44NJ9 ago

Wasn't he big on the Sandy Hook stuff? Did anything happen there? hhhhmmm...nope. He's a good for nothing, dis info pork rind.

samhara ago

He back - pedaled on that.. How people could still trust him?.. It defies reason.

fartyshorts ago

Sandy Hook was fake AF. Just watch the dashboard cams with the official report at hand.

justice4kidz ago

they have already been caught. how about podesta and clinton?

icydays33 ago

Yeah well, Alex Jones also promised us some breaking revelations and only gave us months old info

GhengisPlan ago

OMFG https://vid.me/NacV

6308206402864082******

uuuuuuuuuus ago

sheep can't see past his obvious tactics. point me to one alex jones report that has lead to the arrest or exposure of a single elite or one of their blackmailed/bought "super gophers"...you can't. this is because he does and says just enough to satisfy his audience. he is a gatekeeper. he had a rothschild on his show and all he did was yell about a global co2 tax like it was a wwe promo.

GhengisPlan ago

OMFG https://vid.me/NacV

74027026482493749384********

V____Z ago

And how exactly did he get onto Bohemian Grove grounds without being shot? They LET HIM IN to give him street cred, because he works for them.

equineluvr ago

That was a whitewash "report" he gave.

I have always suspected that AJ cut a "deal" with the Grovers. That is the ONLY explanation for him getting in there and remaining UNDETECTED while he was "undercover" with the incredibly tight security there.

Notice there was NOTHING about ANY of the cabins, NOTHING of their famous speeches, NOTHING of their parties, and what little he did shoot didn't really show anything.

Forgetmenot ago

I often wondered about that!

GhengisPlan ago

OMG PLEASE SHARE https://vid.me/GN3l

3828082080248****