"Dr." Phil is a fraud who is NOT licensed to practice in any state.
His Texas license was yanked when he failed to fulfill legal requirements to have it reinstated in the wake of a SEX SCANDAL WITH A PATIENT, A HUGE NO-NO!
Once upon a time, McGraw really was licensed as a clinical psychologist. In 1989, the Texas board that licenses psychologists disciplined him for an inappropriate "dual relationship" with a 19-year-old patient. (McGraw denies the young woman's claim that the relationship was sexual.) The Texas Board of Examiners of Psychologists ordered him to take an ethics class and have his practice supervised for a year. He subsequently stopped practicing therapy and started a jury consultation firm, Courtroom Sciences Inc. (CSI). It was in this capacity that he met Oprah Winfrey, then fighting a lawsuit by the beef industry, who boosted him into the world of show biz.
Once again, when provided with an opportunity to introduce people to PG, people on here complain that the venue isn't good enough. sigh just take over his FB page the way we did Twitter a few weeks back.
Ooh, this could also be a trap for the other side, i would plan something like this. Have a popular media personality who's on your side flip the script and start dropping these things using popular vehicles to get the word out, if these guys are threatened by it and need to shut her up, they will try to go after her or the media personality, perfect trap. I don't know if this is legit though so not saying that but i would plan a trap like this.
Dr. Phil? Bad smell; Plenty reasons given in this thread. It's damage control / discrediting likely, but I've always seen Dr. Phil as a doctrine cannon disguised as entertainment. (Staging of stereotypes getting into fights and what not more). A form of neural programming to program the mainstream audience with the profile of what they want the audience to think what a stereotype victim is; and more so, how he, as the "established psychologist" is going to carefully demarginalize them. See my comments in the thread here. Tread with care.
Additional note. Black haired woman; wearing a RED top. Yes, this is going to be exactly what I stated.
I'll explain the significance of red-dressed / topped women:. Yes, like 666, 17 and OK, horns etc, the red-dressed woman is another "flash-signature" of the cult. Google the "usual suspect" political women in picture modus and you'll see what I mean. Then google "Lucifer red dress". Theresa May (UK), Cristia Freeland (Canada).
Of course, the parents did lie and fabricate a letter from the FBI, so if the story is real(not assuming it is) then the parents deserved it, but I still wonder if this episode was designed to discredit claims about the prevalence of sex trafficking. I think the entertainment media, especially tv shows, generally tries to write content related to popular events in order to get people talking about the shows and generally stir up more buzz. Anyone seen the new "American Crime" episodes depicting teenage prostitutes? So maybe Dr. Phil is just trying to stir up more buzz, and maybe there's a bigger motive behind it. Most likely, none of us will ever know, and really I think it's better if we give Dr. Phil as little credit as possible. Like Jerry Springer, it does produce the occasional cash-me-outside-like laugh, but for the most part I would just stay away from that kind of garbage.
If I had to guess(which I don't but I will), I would guess that Dr. Phil is going to bring the woman's parents on the show, and they are going to dispute her claim that she was sold at birth. Then Dr. Phil will show that her claims of being sold in an elite trafficking ring were actually a cover for her own choice on how to make money. There has to be at least someone made a fool or it wouldn't be entertaining, right? We will see tomorrow!
Yes! I was thoroughly surprised and happy with how it turned out. I watched it last night and I kept waiting for Dr. Phil to say that she had imagined the stories or something but it never happened. I am wondering how pizzagate deniers think about the episode.
I was so glad, and like you, I was waiting for something but nope. If Dr. Phil as a mental health guy is willing to get real about this, it is a lot of strength on our side. I have never been one of those that constantly derides what he does. It may be tv, it may have some downsides, (notice he mentioned in that episode he doesn't do 15 minute diagnostics) but the sheer amount of people he has enabled to find ongoing, useful therapy over the years is undeniable.
I hope people stop bashing him and start looking at it from the perspective of people who he helps. BUT I wonder he is going to get pushback from above? Hmm. stay tuned lol
I actually didn't realize that the sticky was changed until you pointed it out. I would love to see a big protest bring attention to pizzagate/pedogate. After reading the sticky, I do agree that it is important that the community doesn't leave itself open to being portrayed by the media as a group that promotes violence, and the voat moderators may have to be especially careful in what they promote to keep the site from being shut down. That being said, the sticky is still making people aware of the protest just by mentioning it, and in my mind the concerns raised by the sticky are not a reason not to go out and participate. Hopefully a big group turns out on the 25th!
I agree. with most of what you said and basically it is a positivie outlook so we need that. But the first protest was probably hurt by this post which was wrong and there is no reason to leave it up as our main sticky when it is so inaccurate.
Anyway I'm glad you took a look. crossed fingers for 25th!
I do think he gets a lot of people therapy they'd never otherwise get so I just can't bash him. However I do get what you are saying - he always does twists and there is a good chance he will bring somebody to discredit or if it goes really bad, a therapist that says she's made it up and has a big imagination! So we should tune in tomorrow as they say, you have piqued my interest.
Fun piece of unrelated but ironic tv trivia: Joe Biden appeared on the Law & Order SVU episode, "Making a Rapist", which aired September 28th 2016 - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5901996/
:)
This international sex slave ring run by HIGH LEVEL people known as pizzagate has become unavoidable despite their best efforts
My guess is they actually "gave" her or freed her, she seems like Cheryl Dempsey from Poughkeepsie Tapes. She was probably the most obedient so they threw her at Dr Phil as if to play some sick power play. Like "you can find the victims -- alive -- but they'll ask for us back and they will miss us"
I also wanted to add that he shows support of law enforcement on his show. I believe I saw a pic of him on his facebook with NYPD. Could it be possible he's aware of something to be exposed ?
equineluvr ago
"Dr." Phil is a fraud who is NOT licensed to practice in any state.
His Texas license was yanked when he failed to fulfill legal requirements to have it reinstated in the wake of a SEX SCANDAL WITH A PATIENT, A HUGE NO-NO!
Once upon a time, McGraw really was licensed as a clinical psychologist. In 1989, the Texas board that licenses psychologists disciplined him for an inappropriate "dual relationship" with a 19-year-old patient. (McGraw denies the young woman's claim that the relationship was sexual.) The Texas Board of Examiners of Psychologists ordered him to take an ethics class and have his practice supervised for a year. He subsequently stopped practicing therapy and started a jury consultation firm, Courtroom Sciences Inc. (CSI). It was in this capacity that he met Oprah Winfrey, then fighting a lawsuit by the beef industry, who boosted him into the world of show biz.
http://forensicpsychologist.blogspot.com/2008/01/dr-phil-controversy-highlights-public.html
LEGALLY, despite his education, since he is UNLICENSED he is NOT allowed to call himself "Dr." Phil.
Did Dr. Phil really and intentionally mislead the public?
He did mislead the public by suggesting that he is a psychologist.
http://www.everydaypsychology.com/2008/01/is-dr-phil-actually-psychologist.html#.WNCsTGfav3g
InfoWarsDotComFan ago
https://web.archive.org/web/20170320233723/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4332462/Sex-slave-flown-private-jets-sold-clients.html
equineluvr ago
FYI Your links are conjoined and need a space between them.
Judgejewdy ago
Once again, when provided with an opportunity to introduce people to PG, people on here complain that the venue isn't good enough. sigh just take over his FB page the way we did Twitter a few weeks back.
Cleareyes ago
Ooh, this could also be a trap for the other side, i would plan something like this. Have a popular media personality who's on your side flip the script and start dropping these things using popular vehicles to get the word out, if these guys are threatened by it and need to shut her up, they will try to go after her or the media personality, perfect trap. I don't know if this is legit though so not saying that but i would plan a trap like this.
VieBleu ago
good catch
Robin looks red-pilled at the end of this!
huhhh ago
You mean Caitlyn Jenner? I don't trust the legitimacy of Robin or Dr Phil, because TV usually lies to me.
ArtificalDuality ago
Dr. Phil? Bad smell; Plenty reasons given in this thread. It's damage control / discrediting likely, but I've always seen Dr. Phil as a doctrine cannon disguised as entertainment. (Staging of stereotypes getting into fights and what not more). A form of neural programming to program the mainstream audience with the profile of what they want the audience to think what a stereotype victim is; and more so, how he, as the "established psychologist" is going to carefully demarginalize them. See my comments in the thread here. Tread with care.
Additional note. Black haired woman; wearing a RED top. Yes, this is going to be exactly what I stated.
I'll explain the significance of red-dressed / topped women:. Yes, like 666, 17 and OK, horns etc, the red-dressed woman is another "flash-signature" of the cult. Google the "usual suspect" political women in picture modus and you'll see what I mean. Then google "Lucifer red dress". Theresa May (UK), Cristia Freeland (Canada).
ArthurEdens ago
His wife had a phony shock face, you're right, bs
GladToBeHere ago
fake news? my instinct tells me she is not a victim of elite sex trafficking
Judgejewdy ago
Take your opportunities to redpill where you can get them.
ArthurEdens ago
Yep
VieBleu ago
based on what? - provide some support for this.
PizzaDestroyer ago
In the episode linked below Dr. Phil makes the parents look pretty dumb for accusing their daughter's online 'boyfriend' of a being a sex trafficker: http://www.drphil.com/videos/teen-says-shes-ready-to-move-to-argentina-to-be-with-online-boyfriend-shes-never-met-in-person/
Of course, the parents did lie and fabricate a letter from the FBI, so if the story is real(not assuming it is) then the parents deserved it, but I still wonder if this episode was designed to discredit claims about the prevalence of sex trafficking. I think the entertainment media, especially tv shows, generally tries to write content related to popular events in order to get people talking about the shows and generally stir up more buzz. Anyone seen the new "American Crime" episodes depicting teenage prostitutes? So maybe Dr. Phil is just trying to stir up more buzz, and maybe there's a bigger motive behind it. Most likely, none of us will ever know, and really I think it's better if we give Dr. Phil as little credit as possible. Like Jerry Springer, it does produce the occasional cash-me-outside-like laugh, but for the most part I would just stay away from that kind of garbage.
If I had to guess(which I don't but I will), I would guess that Dr. Phil is going to bring the woman's parents on the show, and they are going to dispute her claim that she was sold at birth. Then Dr. Phil will show that her claims of being sold in an elite trafficking ring were actually a cover for her own choice on how to make money. There has to be at least someone made a fool or it wouldn't be entertaining, right? We will see tomorrow!
VieBleu ago
It didn't happen the way you thought. You are really happy about that right?!
PizzaDestroyer ago
Yes! I was thoroughly surprised and happy with how it turned out. I watched it last night and I kept waiting for Dr. Phil to say that she had imagined the stories or something but it never happened. I am wondering how pizzagate deniers think about the episode.
VieBleu ago
I was so glad, and like you, I was waiting for something but nope. If Dr. Phil as a mental health guy is willing to get real about this, it is a lot of strength on our side. I have never been one of those that constantly derides what he does. It may be tv, it may have some downsides, (notice he mentioned in that episode he doesn't do 15 minute diagnostics) but the sheer amount of people he has enabled to find ongoing, useful therapy over the years is undeniable.
I hope people stop bashing him and start looking at it from the perspective of people who he helps. BUT I wonder he is going to get pushback from above? Hmm. stay tuned lol
VieBleu ago
what do you think about the protests, do you like the sticky that cautions about them at the top of the forum?
PizzaDestroyer ago
I actually didn't realize that the sticky was changed until you pointed it out. I would love to see a big protest bring attention to pizzagate/pedogate. After reading the sticky, I do agree that it is important that the community doesn't leave itself open to being portrayed by the media as a group that promotes violence, and the voat moderators may have to be especially careful in what they promote to keep the site from being shut down. That being said, the sticky is still making people aware of the protest just by mentioning it, and in my mind the concerns raised by the sticky are not a reason not to go out and participate. Hopefully a big group turns out on the 25th!
VieBleu ago
I agree. with most of what you said and basically it is a positivie outlook so we need that. But the first protest was probably hurt by this post which was wrong and there is no reason to leave it up as our main sticky when it is so inaccurate.
Anyway I'm glad you took a look. crossed fingers for 25th!
VieBleu ago
I do think he gets a lot of people therapy they'd never otherwise get so I just can't bash him. However I do get what you are saying - he always does twists and there is a good chance he will bring somebody to discredit or if it goes really bad, a therapist that says she's made it up and has a big imagination! So we should tune in tomorrow as they say, you have piqued my interest.
PizzaDestroyer ago
Fun piece of unrelated but ironic tv trivia: Joe Biden appeared on the Law & Order SVU episode, "Making a Rapist", which aired September 28th 2016 - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt5901996/ :)
VieBleu ago
lol but OF course. they couldn't get bill so they had to settle I suppose.
featheredmasks ago
I truly wonder why in the world if this is connected to elites that this would be allowed to air and why she hasn't been killed.
SINISTERFUNKHOUSE ago
My guess is far fetched, but it's a thought.
This international sex slave ring run by HIGH LEVEL people known as pizzagate has become unavoidable despite their best efforts
My guess is they actually "gave" her or freed her, she seems like Cheryl Dempsey from Poughkeepsie Tapes. She was probably the most obedient so they threw her at Dr Phil as if to play some sick power play. Like "you can find the victims -- alive -- but they'll ask for us back and they will miss us"
InnocentAngels ago
Exactly. I thought about that too.
InnocentAngels ago
I also wanted to add that he shows support of law enforcement on his show. I believe I saw a pic of him on his facebook with NYPD. Could it be possible he's aware of something to be exposed ?
PM_Me_Your_Clam_Pics ago
I have never watched that show but will be tomorrow. Start sending it out to friends referencing pizzagate, gotta redpill more!
strix-varia ago
Was this episode actually aired?
Judgejewdy ago
Airs tomorrow. Good opportunity to use the facebook posts (viewers comment on each show usually for at least a day or two) to bring up PG!