Now this is a guy who's very strong and blunt in his conservative views but he's not known for making things up. In fact he was skeptical of PizzaGate when the story broke saying that he didn't see enough evidence to fully convince him.
- In this video, he discusses in some lurid detail the alleged video evidence that his friend inside the FBI has of James Comey, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew, Prince Charles, Harry Reid, Bill Clinton etc. engaging in sex acts with each other and with children.
- E.T. Williams claims to have personally viewed a video of James Comey and Prince Charles engaging in gay sex with each other (10:58)
https://youtu.be/JWdTXTyyD04?t=1m45s
Maybe his FBI friend is a liar but I felt I had to post this as this guy is a prolific YouTuber and as I said, does not have a reputation for making wild claims unless he is clearly joking.
view the rest of the comments →
DeathToMasons ago
I don't like this video. I have come across this individual before but have always clicked off the video. He is highly theatrical, wears sun glasses and has pictures of himself on the wall. He is attempting to be a youtube personality. He simply talks about what he knows and never presents evidence. You simply post a video of a man making claims. I did not bother to watch the entire vide, but I will. I am afraid I am not impressed by his statements, and I don't like people trying to build a cult of personality and then talking about serious issues. I feel it makes a circus out of things. No need for personalities.
dFrog ago
I agree with the bit about personalities and that getting in front of a camera and saying things isn't a very strong format, but I don't think it's appropriate to assume that his intentions are that shallow. Yes, this video probably wouldn't do much to redpill someone totally uninitiated, but it has value to researchers in the form of a possible lead. It belongs in the stack of others who have made statements based on what they were told by alleged insiders. File under "something to consider."
Honestly, this is the nature of YouTube: People who haven't honed their media skills but have the will and the means to speak out going ahead and doing so. This is why I hated YouTube when I was a teenager, but I've come to accept the roughness around the edges because it's a great platform for citizen journalists and we (as a collective of citizens who aren't media professionals) are on a bit of a learning curve. The best thing to do is to set an example for others to learn from so that we collectively get better.
awarenessadventurer ago
I am 100% positive you are a white male and you dont know a single black person in any real way.
DeathToMasons ago
An ignorant comment on your part. You took my comment and inserted me having a problem with blacks. I will use your tactic and say you must be a libtard for coming to that conclusion. He makes a bad impression. You make a bad impression. He presented no evidence. You pulled me knowing no blacks out of your ass. No wonder why some youtube stranger impresses you. You are a simpleton.
awarenessadventurer ago
but I am right..... arent I? lol....
Kristina_Gilliam ago
Non-autists have personalities. Shocking, I know. It would be so much easier if people were robots. Look, he has no history of making wild claims or engaging in hoaxes and is relaying important information. If you can't get past someone's looks or personality and want incriminating evidence handed to you on a silver platter then you're wasting your time here on this subverse.
DeathToMasons ago
Well know, you seem to not get my point. My point being that he is putting on a show, selling a personality and trying to be the show. The material is serious and not made for his stand in front of the camera with his sunglasses on, act blunt, present nothing solid and show his image everywhere in the room with big microphones. This subject is not a joke and he looks like a youtube poser. Maybe you still need idols or larger than life theatrics. I need all the bullshit out fo the way and no distractions. This is not serious material.
Kristina_Gilliam ago
I get your point. You care more about the messenger than the message.