So Vault 7 illustrated to the world that (for the period covered 2013-2016, and likely for far longer) the CIA had access to ALL Windows enabled devices, iPhones, Skype, cars/trucks/planes (OnStar, etc..), medical devices, smart devices and appliances, etc.
Thus, THEY are FULLY aware of any and all human trafficking, pedophilia, child sacrifice, etc conducted either online or in microphone/camera range of any of the above devices.
That said, not only is pizzagate/pedogate already a global scourge, but it now clearly has perhaps the most capable and entrenched private wet-work army and intel service as it's gatekeeper/enabler.
Keep in mind that Wikileaks is a ROTHSCHILD operation, making this all the more curious....
These are from 2012...
http://www.abeldanger.net/2011/02/wikileaks-rothschild-operation-swiss.html
http://theglobalelite.org/wikileaks-is-a-rothschild-operation/
http://www.nwo-news.com/2016/06/02/wikileaks-is-a-rothschild-operation/
Highlights:
–a sister-in-law and second cousin of the Rothschilds posted bail for Julian Assange
–The Economist (a Rothschild magazine) gave Assange its New Media Award in 2008
–Wikileaks used the law firm Fox Rothschild to overturn a judge’s ruling to order a web host to shut down the Wikileaks site
– The Guardian and The New York Times, two of Assange’s media partners, are linked to the Rothschilds
–The owner of the mansion where Assange was eventually put under house arrest has links to Rothschilds
–Assange’s lawyer is also Rothschilds’ lawyer
–US Senator Joe Lieberman who was ultimately responsible for making Assange the largest media personality of the decade, is a member of the Council On Foreign Relations (a Rothschild organization)
So you have the Rothschild contingent using wikileaks to burn down the CIA, while the CIA has been enabling and protecting the global network of human trafficking and pedophilia (as well as ALL other crimes the Vault 7 capabilities betray them as having access to and record of...
Very strange days.
Just know that pursuing pizzagate is now also pursuing the CIA who has done nothing to expose it, while possessing untold years of evidence, globally.
view the rest of the comments →
GeorgeHodelDidit ago
I have felt for a while that Pizzagate was not meant to get out in the WikiLeaks drop before the election. But the hive mind of humanity figured out the pizza code words and spawned the Pizzagate story. The group that is behind Trump wanted to use the potential blackmail of pedophila to force the Soros side of the Illuminati to allow the wealth to come back to America. I dont think they ever really intended the kid raping and sacrifice and eating to get out.
Its like two mafia groups battling it out for domination. And one group seems maybe a little bit saner but likely is still just as devoted to many of the Illuminati´s goals. Trump seems very devoted to GREATER ISRAEL and war with Iran. He also is rattling the war drums against China. So I hope Trump is legit but I do have my fears.
Votescam ago
Finding it difficult to go all the way with the OP, but who knows? Really think that the story of human trafficking and organ trafficking was getting out there.
Some groups of people had to be really disturbed by all of that and wanting to get the public in on it. I think the story of pedophilia, SRA and eating was already out -- it just wasn't out there strongly enough to hit the public consciousness. Allegedly, this is info released to Assange, not something that they select. As Assange has said before when asked why he wasn't reporting on other issues, he responded that WikiLeaks reports on the information that they get.
There is an ongoing war for control of our government and intelligence. But there's no guarantee that either side is the good guys. What is clear is that the public has no control over our government as that was taken in '63. Nor do our elections give us any control since 50 years of voting on hack-able computers. We have absolutely no leverage over elected officials. UNLESS we stop cooperating with capitalism. That's our only road out of this.
The Wild Card is Global Warming. And Trump represents the side which doesn't wasn't the public to have confirmation of it. Why? Because capitalism would be over in the next 2 minutes. I think we have to look at all of this cashing in of chips as being spurred on by Global Warming. All of the "terror" fakery working as attempts at distortion to hide Global Warming. And the final cards they may actually play in order to keep the public from rising up over Global Warming may be WAR. War with Russia -- and China if they have to do it.
I do NOT however think that pizzagate/pedo-gate is distraction. It's real. And I think Podesta's email "password" was the key to opening up this thing. It's also heavily CIA/Gestapo and heavily against intelligence spying on the public. Because we see this in the new release which links CIA/MKULTRA and CIA/runaway spying on public. BOTH are anti-CIA.
We need to keep looking at this and discussing it. We will figure it out. And hopefully with more help from WikiLeaks.
9217 ago
OP is a shill.
OP exposed themselves by using Trump as an insult. OP should keep Buzzfeed as a dayjob.
OP stated: "If you want to trust wikileaks, the cia, trump, alex jones, or whoever you wish, go right ahead."
https://i.imgtc.com/D7971UK.png
You guys are all falling for a Brock Shill because he used a nice title to get you to mistrust wikileaks. Convenient, four days after Vault 7 with 99% of the content yet to be seen. And with OP's account three (oh, I'm sorry, FOUR hours) hours old. I'm sure those intentions were altruistic though.
Votescam ago
Not accepting anything -- I'm countering what the OP is pushing and maybe someone will read what I'm saying.
There will always be questions about Assange -- like is he even still alive? I sure hope so!! I wish we had 100 WikiLeaks.
Keep on tellin' it -- !!! :)
9217 ago
:) Me too. I just hate lies that are framed as truth. And the CIA IS the enemy. The substance of the post had nothing to do with the CIA but everything to do with smearing wikileaks. The this post functions to BENEFIT the CIA.
(Hi Langley, Fuck You and Fuck David Brock. Also you make shitty memes.)
Justaryde ago
Apparently you neglected to read the OP: So Vault 7 illustrated to the world that (for the period covered 2013-2016, and likely for far longer) the CIA had access to ALL Windows enabled devices, iPhones, Skype, cars/trucks/planes (OnStar, etc..), medical devices, smart devices and appliances, etc.
Thus, THEY are FULLY aware of any and all human trafficking, pedophilia, child sacrifice, etc conducted either online or in microphone/camera range of any of the above devices.
That said, not only is pizzagate/pedogate already a global scourge, but it now clearly has perhaps the most capable and entrenched private wet-work army and intel service as it's gatekeeper/enabler.
And then, I went on to ALSO question wikileaks.
Cheers.
Justaryde ago
You do see that I am CONDEMNING THE CIA FOR INACTION ON PIZZAGATE AND MYRIAD OTHER INFORMATION THAT THEY WOULD BE IN POSSESSION OF REGARDING INTERNATIONAL CRIMINALITY...
AND
Pointing out the obvious- that wikileaks (nor anyone else, but especially them, is to be trusted as a force for good, even though they are exposing the evils of the CIA.)
Yet somehow that makes me a shill? For who? Who benefits by people not trusting ANY sources? Surely NOT those who would have interest in controlling said sources, the narrative at large, or the general tenor of the consciousness and desire for uprising, which falls perfectly into the problem reaction solution formula of social engineering. No, must be a shill...
You are missing the mark.
samhara ago
"Who benefits by people not trusting ANY sources? "
Chaos Benefit.
People need to have Convictions! . If you can't sort truth from fiction you need to study some classical arts? Grammar
Logic
Rhetoric.
What is the point of your trust? What is the outcome? If we read the Wikileaks, study it, sort it, strain it, digest it chew it.
What do we have to trust it?
Are you implying that?
If you think it's FakeNews then ignore it, who cares?
But why does it bother you that other people study it?
Justaryde ago
I dont know where you get the impression that I am bothered by people studying the content- I do so myself...
My point is to question the motivation, timing, and orchestrators behind the revelation of the information, the platform itself.
Conviction: a strong persuasion or belief I disagree that people need beliefs. People need knowledge and wisdom, which come from facts, and personal experience. Beliefs are something else entirely, and do not have to have anything to do with the truth. I do not suggest anything outside of ones own personal experience or one's intuition/common sense/gut feelings be 'trusted'.
Again, I did not suggest the content is 'fake'. Rather I encourage everyone to question the intentions and puppet masters of the source(s).