You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

Removing per Rule 2. Please repost if investigation of any of these links actually points toward a connection to Mossad. Thanks.

FLYNNL1VE5 ago

How about do some research yourself. Have you not noticed George Webb linked Dyncorp and human trafficking to Palantir. Palantir also is the backend database running NCMEC and ICMEC? Do yall know DYNCORP actually owns VOAT? I would imagine so.

Vindicator ago

George Webb tosses a lot of stuff out there without enough evidence, in my opinion. I agree anything/anyone involved with NYMEC and ICMEC is suspect and needs a very thorough colonscopy. I agree that Dyncorp is rotten and needs even more meticulous examination. What I don't agree with is that spouting claims without links to documents that support them is sufficient. This subverse is, for all intents and purposes, the newspaper of record for the Pizzagate investigation. We are putting things down in print, to be judged by any and all comers for as long as Voat is a thing. We are not showing a video of a free-rolling commentary about a picture-collage mind-map of possible connections for further research. We are documenting this shit. Our ability to source claims will be the sum total of value we provide. It's our greatest strength and our biggest challenge. It's why we have the submission guidelines.

So don't take the pussy route of claims like "do some research yourself" and "Do you all know DYNCORP actually owns VOAT" without providing any support for your claims like the intellectual dwarves at CNN. It merely shows you aren't a serious researcher or a serious opponent of the Pedocracy. Show me some links, or quit wasting everyone's time.

FLYNNL1VE5 ago

Forgive me if I don't advertise as the BLACK OPS ANON GUY

Vindicator ago

LOL. For a sophisticated, professional badass, you sure seem easily irked. Don't wear yourself out bitching about mods. Just write your post so it satisfies the guidelines. Hint:

  1. Write a less sensational title that can actually be backed up by your links
  2. Put claims you can't back with links -- i.e. suppositions, hunches, leads, speculations -- in a comment rather than the body of the post
  3. Make sure every link is actually what it purports to be.

I guarantee your post won't be removed, and if it is, you can go complain at ProtectVoat and they'll be on our asses for censorship in a NewYork minute. No one is trying to gatekeep or stifle discussion. In fact, I would LOVE to see you repost this with your claims backed. There's good stuff in here. People need to be asking these questions.

If you really want to impress the shit out of everyone, use that black ops IT know-how, get hold of some of the Vault7 CIA malware, and hack us some hard evidence on Palantir, NYCMEC, Saban or any of the other assholes we're trying to pin down. I would LOVE to see a random pizzagate investigator post something link that.

FLYNNL1VE5 ago

You are playing a very minor part in the process. The more you censor the more minor it becomes.