You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

andrevandelft ago

This is all very improbable, in my opinion:

  • the claims are way too improbable; there should probably have been more witnesses
  • the parents are in a divorce; in such a war parties become liars, to gain guardianship
  • in the testimonies video the kids appear under high pressure to tell a rehearsed story, even hypnotized
  • the videos of the police interviewing the boy reveal IMO that the interview is careful and that the boy told a prefabricated story

Some police interview videos:

I would say the allegations are totally nonsense. Others here say they are true. At least there is a disagreement over the facts. Then I think this forum should not take a side in such an issue. I would recommend that this thread will be deleted because of the disagreement and possible loss of credibility of this forum. If not, then I suggest that this thread should at least get a marker "Accuracy in Question".

The credibility of this forum concerns me much. I have invested time to post 4 pieces here, with reliable factual data. I am worried that carelessness such as I perceive here, damages the credibility of my pieces and even of my authorship.

Ovi-Kintobor ago

https://dearmandoeshampstead.wordpress.com/2016/02/29/linking-dearmans-sock-accounts/

http://loveforlife.com.au/content/15/03/30/darkness-visible-part-one-d-hampstead-satanic-ritual-abuse-children-gabriel-draper-

"Mk Ultra 666" & other sock puppets. Same accounts for years, perpetual harassment. Too many similarities at writing between these accounts. These claims seems way too improbable in your opinion. We thought many claims were way too improbable. Until we discovered that the decor is made of cardboard and we live in a theater scene.