Credit for this post goes to @Vindicator. I'm just posting his findings.
As most of you know by now, there is a demonstration scheduled to happen in Washington, D.C. on March 25th, titled the Investigate Pizzagate march, the flyer of which you can see in the subverse sidebar.
What you may not know is that a less popular demonstration has also been scheduled to take place in Washington, D.C. on March 18th, called the Stand up for the Children march (a.k.a. the Million Lost Children March).
Please take the following with a grain of salt, but I think this latter might be a false flag.
The March 25th Investigate Pizzagate event was registered on Facebook on January 29th.
The March 18th Stand up for the Children event was registered on Facebook on February 24th.
What are the chances that, without any precedent, two Pizzagate demonstrations are organized in the same city exactly one week apart, with the one scheduled for earlier being announced a month after the other one, without any coordination between the two?
The March 18th Stand up for the Children demonstration also seems to advertise itself with imagery of violence and vigilante justice, in line with the temperament demonstrated by the organizer on Twitter.
I'm concerned of this one being orchestrated to involve some sort of violence along the lines of the CPP shooting incident that will serve as grounds for the media to smear the investigation again. But even if that doesn't happen, this division between the two marches will dilute the size and impact of both protests for sure.
I may be wrong, but be very careful, and vet the event that you attend thoroughly.
view the rest of the comments →
FoxDen ago
@Vindicator and @wecanhelp Whatever would possess you to do this? Becki Percy will be at the March 18th protest. There is nothing "false flag" about it. You are VERY wrong about this. Please do not divide us. Please do not besmirch the efforts of very good men and women.
wecanhelp ago
I could be, and I stated that in my post to begin with. Unfair would be calling your protest a false flag without any grounds. What I did was to call it a possible false flag, based on circumstances that, should my assumption be true, would support that assumption. Instead of repeating that I'm wrong, you may as well address my points one by one, and clear up any doubt about them.
sound_of_silence ago
you guys deserve a public apology here in this thread.