Franklin Wiki Page (pizzagate)

submitted ago by pbvrocks

Expanding on this latest post https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1703692...

The post mentions the Franklin scandal wiki page and suggests we look at the "talk" tab..which I did. The talk section is moderated and the previous post mentions that the moderator is a former Bush official...

There is only 1 user who is moderating this forum. A search does not give you much..however, a little digging lead to this...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:WLRoss/Sandbox2

Which appears to be a sandbox where WLRoss was constructing arguments to use about Franklin and other scandals??? WTF?? Also mentions 911 moderator??

Do I really need to specify how this is related to pizzagate? (Some mods deny very VALUABLE posts due to ticky dot rules..sure we have all had it happen...)...

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

V____Z ago

Here is prior work on how the page looked before it was scrubbed https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1559814

Shows the whole history of the whitewashing.

WLRoss looks like the good guy, he fought hard using Wikipedias own rules, and still lost the battle. He was a longtime user, and knew what he was doing by all appearances. He doesn't really edit much anymore. Don't know if it's related, but finding out how unfair and biased Wikipedia is, and that the rules are utter bullshit if they get in the way of wiki's Orwellian purpose, can make an editor retire out of frustration. (Source: personal history)

The moderator of the page unofficially (since ther is not supposed to be such a thing) is mongo and the prior one was the Windslow character.

Dorfaladin ago

I might be wrong, but that MONGO character is the guy I was talking about. Can anyone verify that he worked for george w bush?

V____Z ago

I'm not sure how that could be clarified. How would one know MONGOs real life identity?

Dorfaladin ago

yeah couldnt get much more out of his nick name. I just wish more people would try to edit that wikipage... in opposition to how they constantly hover over it and edit it. Maybe it would gain more visibility and people would take some notice.

V____Z ago

i tried in vain a few years ago. Made some changes but wasn't able to mention the documentary. Final reason was that youtube wasn't a reliable source.

Dorfaladin ago

...

It seems that the only sources quotable besides peer reviewed papers are WP, NYT, Daily Kos, HuffPost... the usual suspects. Thats messed up man.