Expanding on this latest post https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1703692...
The post mentions the Franklin scandal wiki page and suggests we look at the "talk" tab..which I did. The talk section is moderated and the previous post mentions that the moderator is a former Bush official...
There is only 1 user who is moderating this forum. A search does not give you much..however, a little digging lead to this...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:WLRoss/Sandbox2
Which appears to be a sandbox where WLRoss was constructing arguments to use about Franklin and other scandals??? WTF?? Also mentions 911 moderator??
Do I really need to specify how this is related to pizzagate? (Some mods deny very VALUABLE posts due to ticky dot rules..sure we have all had it happen...)...
view the rest of the comments →
listentoreason2017 ago
I'm a big fan of wading into talk pages of contentious articles and not super well-versed in how other pages work.
That being said, reading this, it reads like the person who wrote it is very pro-franklin scandal i.e. they don't like the current page.
Maybe I'm reading it wrong, but he seems to find Phoenix and Winslow to be antagonizers and is just retelling how he thought he got railroaded by Wikipedia.
listentoreason2017 ago
OHHHH forget it. WLRoss isn't the moderator of that forum. I'm an idiot.