Whenever a website has a talk page or comments section, I usually read them and often I get a lot of info I would never get by just reading the main page or article. Anyways recently when I was heavily researching the franklin scandal, I read the wikipedia article on the subject. It is a perfect example of attempting to crush the truth, and it really pisses me off. It does not stop there though. It gets even more disturbing when you read the talk page. I highly suggest to anyone who has not done so to read the article and talk page concerning the franklin scandal at wikileaks here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_child_prostitution_ring_allegations .
Something kind of bizarre, is that there is a moderator who constantly obstructs the truth from getting to the main page, and with just a little bit of digging on a few websites (including encyclopedia dramatica, strangely enough) found that one of the main instigators on the article talk page was a former cabinet official for George W Bush... Really freaking weird. Please check this out guys!
view the rest of the comments →
QuestionEverything ago
He was a legislator from Nebraska and NOTHING he has written has been refuted by anyone. So not sure where you get 'rejected as a reliable source".. Its more like MSM completely ignores these stories.
Show me ONE source saying he's unreliable. Yeah, you can't.
I know where some of the people who were involved in this work now. A few of them were given really comfy positions at high end dealerships. King works at a BMW place in Delaware I believe. (CIA owns a lot of car deaierships btw).
V____Z ago
You're right, and I think Wikipedia does not have a case to exclude him. If this was really taken to the proper noticeboard at WP, I don't see how they could keep denying him. Except if they got a whole team of people arguing against it, which they probably would. The administrators tend to stick together, and they can bend any rules, and do.
The one good thing would be to expose their tactics in a very clear way. The story of when then transpires might make for a good article on the overall coverup of pizzagate, and expose Wikipedia in the process.