Whenever a website has a talk page or comments section, I usually read them and often I get a lot of info I would never get by just reading the main page or article. Anyways recently when I was heavily researching the franklin scandal, I read the wikipedia article on the subject. It is a perfect example of attempting to crush the truth, and it really pisses me off. It does not stop there though. It gets even more disturbing when you read the talk page. I highly suggest to anyone who has not done so to read the article and talk page concerning the franklin scandal at wikileaks here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_child_prostitution_ring_allegations .
Something kind of bizarre, is that there is a moderator who constantly obstructs the truth from getting to the main page, and with just a little bit of digging on a few websites (including encyclopedia dramatica, strangely enough) found that one of the main instigators on the article talk page was a former cabinet official for George W Bush... Really freaking weird. Please check this out guys!
view the rest of the comments →
Ihatepizza2 ago
@Dorfaladin of any other contributor here - maybe you should write up a Wiked Pedo page on a subject you are most comfortable with (that you know best). If someone can do this, with a PG subject that they are knowledgeable on, then it will be very easy to see how Wicked Pedo handles the interaction. I would caution to only use hard fact with no conjecture. Maybe keep a tight rein on anything that can not be properly evidenced. WikedPedo will then have 2 choices:
I think either result would be a win for the community. EDIT If anyone decides to do this, might be an idea to run the page as a post here first, to see if the community pokes any holes in your story. Also - be sure to publicise any Wiki entries here so we can all go over and support.
V____Z ago
This was suggested before, and I think it's a great idea.
The topic that was suggested as a new wiki page was the huge pedo bust in the Netherlands recently, there was ample MSM coverage, which is required by Wikipedia, although all of the articles will have to be found using the way back machine, as they've all been removed.
Ihatepizza2 ago
Glad to pitch in of I can. Let me know.
V____Z ago
I feel like I'd be better suited to help as well, not to take the reigns. I'm pretty well burnt out on trying to work with Wikipedia.