See, you're wayyyyyy fucking dumber than me, asshole. There is no math you know that I don't. There is no science that you know that I don't. I am your intellectual superior. I dominate you. You're too dumb to realize it.
My god, what a bunch of u-substitution. Do you complete the square, then use the Pythagorean identity, then integrate cosine, or do you factor out an x before distributing the exponent then use chain rule? Either way requires u-substitution.
Ok, so thats grade 11 calc down, next one is from 1st year calc.
Integrate x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(.... inf
Show your reasoning.
To the unchanged changer bullshit? I've addressed that. You define the variables, ill look at it. But I'm not going to pretend that some apologetic bullshit you learned in sunday school actually makes sense.
Soon as you do that integral I will repeat what I said before. I figure in a couple years i can get you to the point where you're ready to start on formal logic.
No, I want to be able to explain this to you, but first we gotta get through the basics. You can do enough algebra to punch something into Wolfram (and I really appreciate your buddy pointing that out, btw), but a problem arises when I give you a difficult to format infinite exponential. It's a simple problem, but it catches people because of that.
view the rest of the comments →
rodental ago
This will be the real test of whether Wikileaks is now a CIA front or not.
Antiracist4 ago
I want to punch your stupid face in.
@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh
rodental ago
Who are you and why?
Antiracist4 ago
Bcuz your atheism is dumb.
@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh
rodental ago
Oh, you're the retarded Christian, I remember you :)
Fuck Jesus Christ, may he rot in a pit of shit.
Antiracist4 ago
You are an embarrassment to atheism.
@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh
@crensch @stretched_girl
rodental ago
I'm not an atheist, Christian scum :)
Antiracist4 ago
You're a dumb faggot.
@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh
rodental ago
I did not realize that. Tell me more?
Antiracist4 ago
I gave you a perfectly rigorous argument, and you backed out of addressing it at all, because you're a faggot.
@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh
rodental ago
See, this is why they tell you to stay in school, folks.
Antiracist4 ago
See, you're wayyyyyy fucking dumber than me, asshole. There is no math you know that I don't. There is no science that you know that I don't. I am your intellectual superior. I dominate you. You're too dumb to realize it.
@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh
rodental ago
Ok, here's one for you, we'll start out simple.
f (x) = (x^2+4x)^(1/3)
g(x) = is the antiderivative of f(x)
g (2) = 8 What is g (6)?
SarMegahhikkitha ago
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Integral%5B(x%5E2%2B4x)%5E(1%2F3)%5D
Not only is that high school math, but you can plug in the question to Wolfram Alpha. Trying to look smart on the internet is so cringe.
rodental ago
What is the antiderivative of x^(x^(x^(x^(x... inf? Show your reasoning.
rodental ago
Starting simple, will work up. Hope you've brushed up on tensors lately?
Antiracist4 ago
My god, what a bunch of u-substitution. Do you complete the square, then use the Pythagorean identity, then integrate cosine, or do you factor out an x before distributing the exponent then use chain rule? Either way requires u-substitution.
@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh
rodental ago
Just want an answer, thx, then we'll move on to a slightly more difficult one.
Antiracist4 ago
20.60606402462480621259130697827243820084282009257368561201
At what point in this game do you respond to the argument you completely avoided?
@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh
rodental ago
Ok, so thats grade 11 calc down, next one is from 1st year calc.
Integrate x^(x^(x^(x^(x^(.... inf Show your reasoning.
To the unchanged changer bullshit? I've addressed that. You define the variables, ill look at it. But I'm not going to pretend that some apologetic bullshit you learned in sunday school actually makes sense.
antiracist ago
You eat my shit. You've never addressed it because you're too stupid.
@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh
rodental ago
How's that integral going? Ill be impressed if you can figure out how to punch that one into Wolfram.
antiracist ago
I'll be impressed when you can respond to the argument, you know, your challenge here, shiteater.
@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh
rodental ago
Soon as you do that integral I will repeat what I said before. I figure in a couple years i can get you to the point where you're ready to start on formal logic.
antiracist ago
I did the integral. Durrrrrrrrrrr. Once you can ask me in real mathTM then I'll answer you. Durrrrrrrr.
@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh
rodental ago
Hey, btw, have you ever met /u/antiracist4? He's kind of a dick.
Antiracist4 ago
You're kind of a dick.
rodental ago
/u/Antiracist3 though, he's alright. Not the sharpest, but he almost has a trace of civility about him.
Antiracist4 ago
Shut the fuck up and give me all your questions and course outline for formal logic.
rodental ago
No, you get nothing more out of me until you solve my problem and show your work.
rodental ago
Want a hard one? All you have to do is give me that answer to that one.
antiracist ago
Sure why don't you just give me your line up, and then give me a reading schedule for formal logic? Thx.
@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh
rodental ago
No, I want to be able to explain this to you, but first we gotta get through the basics. You can do enough algebra to punch something into Wolfram (and I really appreciate your buddy pointing that out, btw), but a problem arises when I give you a difficult to format infinite exponential. It's a simple problem, but it catches people because of that.