I'm not personally a believer that there IS any Russian connection, but I'll upvote "trust nobody".
What really makes you think that months after the establishment started to shove the russian lie down our throats, fucking wikileaks is the source of the proof? Very unlikely. If there was proof, even half-assed, faked proof, we would have seen it by now.. Even if it was obtained "illegally", once they found evidence of it, they could easily claim it's a matter of national security and that the surveillance was warranted in the first place.
I think he means that wikileaks has been compromised by alphabets who will just make up evidence and release it with the umbrella of credibility wikileaks has.
view the rest of the comments →
1754llp0l171c4l ago
Trust nobody. Since October nobody should trust WL IMO. The question is WHO runs it, the good or the bad guys.
If the content somehow implicates Trump, Them i am sure they are 3 letter agency controlled.
I expect something implicating Trump and Russian connection.
8toborrm ago
I'm not personally a believer that there IS any Russian connection, but I'll upvote "trust nobody".
What really makes you think that months after the establishment started to shove the russian lie down our throats, fucking wikileaks is the source of the proof? Very unlikely. If there was proof, even half-assed, faked proof, we would have seen it by now.. Even if it was obtained "illegally", once they found evidence of it, they could easily claim it's a matter of national security and that the surveillance was warranted in the first place.
brbomglolwtfbbq ago
I think he means that wikileaks has been compromised by alphabets who will just make up evidence and release it with the umbrella of credibility wikileaks has.
8toborrm ago
God damn. I'll repurpose my original vote and pray to god the subversion doesn't run that deep. If it does... That's a deep cut...