He talks about Cernovich in this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dJtcbRYor8
This worries me, because he makes no mention of Cernovich's friendship with Alan Dershowitz, who is pedo buddies with Jeffrey Epstein. Here's the quick rundown for those that don't know: Cernovich is trying to get the sealed testimony of Epstein's accusers unsealed. His reasoning is 1st amendment rights. Cernovich has offered no proof that he's actually being sued by Epstein, other than a fully redacted document that doesn't even have his name on it. He also asks for donations on his website for his legal defense, which always raises red flags.
So, is this some type of limited hangout thought leader op to steer the "alt-right" online community? I'm talking about Cernovich, Seaman, MILO, Pettibone, Paul Joseph Watson, etc, who are always promoting each other, but seem to have no ties to people outside their group and no real insider information. Each of them has exploded in popularity recently, and Seaman has already been outed as a self-promotional shill.
All insights and theories are welcome.
EDIT: Giuffre's opposition statement posted by @JrSlimss in the comments http://pizzagate.wiki/images/7/72/Response_in_Opposition_to_Motion_to_Intervene_-_by_Mike_Cernovich.pdf
It clearly shows that Cernovich is not working on behalf of the sexual abuse victims or the interests of the people.
view the rest of the comments →
ThruTheHaze ago
Interesting theory and props to you for asking questions. I think this is one of those things that you've got to come to conclusions on your own. I never like when I see people ask for money to continue their "research"...Especially when those same people never seem to be contributing anything substantial. Personally, I've never considered MC a big PG player. I tried to watch one of his periscopes where he talks for hours about his dog, or his book...whatever. Maybe your on to something here, maybe not. I've followed all these people for a while now and it's hard for me to believe they are all connected somehow, executing some mega double agent mission. BP has always rang true to me. Seaman is just kind of douchey and elitist. I could be wrong about all of them, but that's the mentality you have to have. As soon as you let anyone spoon feed you your reality, you've become a part of the problem. Do your research, and stand up for what you believe in. Just my opinion though...
roundhouse1776 ago
This is a good take. Critical thinking is key, taking in info from many sources and then deciding for yourself what the truth is. No two individual's perception of reality is going to be exactly the same, due to inherent personal bias.
Proii_Pariah ago
I'm with you guys. I have or do follow the work of most of these guys. None of them do I trust entirely. I am by nature very open to new ideas and information but my mind also keeps track of inconsistencies...no matter how small. In the last few years things have gotten really crazy and the bad info is flying around at a feverish rate. I only trust one person entirely...and that's me. Cernovich and Seaman aren't even worth my time anymore. They are both primarily concerned with self promotion. But, as for others...I'll continue to view and evaluate what they have to offer. I trust my own ability to test and approve truth. In fact, having to navigate this rocky and tumultuous terrain has only served to sharpen my skills. And for that I am grateful.