You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Dressage2 ago

Holy crap! No wonder when it was mentioned about him on here it would immediately be deleted as not pizzagate related. The other name that was always getting deleted was Andrew J. Klein. Did Eric Holder let anything slide with him? Hmmmm?? This is fantastic news! You can always tell the stuff that hits a nerve.

DarkMath ago

"Andrew J. Klein".......It turns out there are 2 Andrew J. Klein's. One's in the DOJ and another is a real estate attorney.

The latter being the one tied into this. We didn't find anything.

OhRutherfordBehave ago

You cant even spell his name right. Its still ambiguous at this point.

DarkMath ago

"spell his name right".......Sorry about that. I'm not shilling, I'm just saying the Andrew from the DOJ is different than Andrew who did the real estate law stuff.

I'm like 95% sure it's a dead end.

OhRutherfordBehave ago

If the FBI does the job that we pay them to do they will confirm or deny. Why, in your own words, only a 95%?

DarkMath ago

Because since learning 9/11 was an inside job and my government killed 3000+ people in cold blood I trust no one.

I'm no longer 100% sure even Santa Claus doesn't exist.

antiracist ago

Okay, explain to @bojangles and me why 9/11 was an inside job.

Please answer in the following form.

If X is the case, then 9/11 was an inside job.

X is the case.

Therefore, 9/11 was an inside job.

@SarMegahhikkitha @eagleshigh

Hey eagleshigh, remember when you never took me up on this challenge? Donghole.

Sar, way to never fucking answer straight about pizzagate.

DarkMath ago

Thanks for the reply. First of all two weeks ago I thought 9/11 "Truthers" were idiots. Then I saw Clinton Cash. Given the evidence of potential wrong doing by the Clinton Foundation in Haiti I decided to go back and re-examine what I knew. I figure if the CIA and the Clintons could gang rape Haiti then all bets were off.

I started with researching WTC 7 because I always thought it was weird WTC 7 is the only Hi-Rise in human history to have collapsed due to fire and at free-fall speed.

Be honest and buckle up:

https://youtu.be/9v2TAiyW54Q?t=1

@bojangles

antiracist ago

@bojangles, I didn't click the link. I'd guess 4 hours, but to say 5 hours seems more poetic.

DarkMath, please answer by solving for X.

If X is the case, then 9/11 was an inside job.

X is the case.

Therefore, 9/11 was an inside job.

Can you answer what X is?

It seems like you're saying:

"If the Clintons raped Haiti and the WTC 7 collapse is fishy, then 9/11 is an inside job."

The Clintons raped Haiti and the WTC 7 collapse is fishy.

Therefore, 9/11 is an inside job.

But how is "If the Clintons raped Haiti and the WTC 7 collapse is fishy, then 9/11 is an inside job," justified? How do you possibly get 9/11 being an inside job from Clinton corruption elsewhere?

Regarding WTC 7, why couldn't heat cause the beams to bend? What do peer review papers say? What do other countries' scientists say? What do computer simulations say?

@SarMegahhikkitha @eagleshigh

DarkMath ago

"The Clintons raped Haiti and the WTC 7 collapse is fishy."

Haiti proves the CIA and the Clinton Crime Family have a credibility problem.

Which suggests they may have lied about other shit.

Which led me to watch "The Anatomy of a Great Deception"

Which explains in detail how WTC 7 was a planned demolition.

Which means "Therefore, 9/11 is an inside job."

I can write all the above in crayon if you want. Just let me know.

;-)

@SarMegahhikkitha @eagleshigh @bojangles

antiracist ago

Yes, I would love that. In crayon. Really spell it out to me. Don't make me watch videos. Just answer the questions in text.

So, if the CIA and the Clinton Crime Family have a credibility problem, how do you get from there to 9/11 being an inside job?

If we already had evidence that WTC 7 was a planned demolition, is that sufficient to conclude that 9/11 was an inside job, or do we need details about the Clinton Crime Family and the CIA?

So again, spell this out for me.

If X is the case, then WTC 7 was a planned demolition.

X is the case.

Therefore, WTC 7 was a planned demolition.

DarkMath ago

"how do you get from there to 9/11 being an inside job?"

Haiti "Clinton Cash" proves the CIA and the Clinton Crime Family have a credibility problem.

Which suggests they may have lied about other shit.

Which led me to watch "The Anatomy of a Great Deception"

Which explains in detail how WTC 7 was a planned demolition.

Which means "Therefore, 9/11 is an inside job."

(joke -begin)

I can write all the above in crayon if you want. Just let me know.

(joke -end)

;-)

@SarMegahhikkitha @eagleshigh @bojangles

antiracist ago

"how do you get from there to 9/11 being an inside job?"

"Clinton Cash" proves the CIA and the Clinton Crime Family have a credibility problem.

I mean, let's say we knew that Joe had a credibility problem. Would that mean Joe was connected to 9/11? There's a missing link here.

Which suggests they may have lied about other shit.

Grant that! Don't merely suggest it! Grant it! Okay, the Clintons have lied about 1 million other things! Now how does that relate to 9/11?

Which led me to watch "The Anatomy of a Great Deception"

Okay, then summarize it to me by solving for X.

If X is the case, then WTC 7 was a planned demolition.

X is the case.

Therefore, WTC 7 was a planned demolition.

@SarMegahhikkitha @eagleshigh @bojangles

DarkMath ago

I think I figured out how we can communicate on a more productive level. We need to agree on the same base line. Here goes:

Do you believe Bill Clinton looked the other way while the CIA flew cocaine into Mena Arkansas?

Antiracist2 ago

I already provided the most productive way to talk. Solve for X to directly fill in the argument.

Whatever you want, sure. Clinton looked the other way for cocaine. Clinton is a rapist. Clinton raped aliens at Area 51. Clinton is a cannibal. Whatever you want. Tie it to 9/11.

@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh

DarkMath ago

"Clinton looked the other way for cocaine."

Clinton looked the other way for the CIA's cocaine.

The Clintons and the CIA are tied together at the hip. Agreed?

Yes or No

Antiracist2 ago

Sure, yes, fine, whatever you want. Just tie it to 9/11 already.

@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh

DarkMath ago

"Just tie it to 9/11 already." - Ok

"If we already had evidence that WTC 7 was a planned demolition, is that sufficient to conclude that 9/11 was an inside job"

Yes! A planned demolition means 9/11 was an inside job.

You win!

I can't prove the CIA and/or Clinton and/or Bush planned 9/11.

Antiracist2 ago

Great. Now solve for X.

If X is the case, then WTC 7 was a planned demolition.

X is the case.

Therefore WTC 7 was a planned demolition.

@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh

DarkMath ago

X = "WTC 7 Fell at Free Fall Speed"

DarkMath ago

Of course! The Straw Man doth cometh!

I highly suspected you were a fucking idiot and tolerated your fetid excuse for a brain just to get here so I could take this giant shit in your mouth.

Fetid? Yes. Who else could have a username "Antiracist2" and still agree the CIA and Clinton imported cocaine to supplement their "black budget" by creating the Crack Epidemic in every Black neighborhood in America. Oh you stepped right into the trap like a Leftist little cunt bitch that you are. You know nothing. You don't even deserve to swallow my shit.

So right of the bat, thank you!

It's pay back.

In good faith I clicked on the first link: http://www.911myths.com/html/freefall.html and started reading fully expecting it to talk about WTC 7 because explaining 1,2 and 7 together is the biggest fucking Straw Man in the entire cesspool of lies we were told.

You wouldn't know a Straw Man if it took a straw filled shit in your mouth you disgusting mother fucking piece of filth. You would make my vomit dirty.

Oh how epic you fucktard, you don't deserve a second more of my time.

@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh

Antiracist2 ago

@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh

Can you believe this guy?

I invite conversation. I patiently wait while he talks about cocaine for no apparent reason.

I try to get to the heart of matters by using logical form. I asked multiple times about how we knew WTC 7 was a planned demolition.

When he finally answers freefall, I invite him to the next portion of the debate, as anyone new to the issue would. "These guys say this about that. What's wrong with what they say?"

And suddenly I'm not worthy to eat this guy's shit.

DarkMath ago

" I'm not worthy to eat this guy's shit."

Aaaaaaaaaaaand you would make my vomit dirty. Minor detail.

Goodbye fucktard

;-)

Antiracist2 ago

Me: WTC 7 didn't freefall.

You: shit shit vomit vomit

@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh

DarkMath ago

It free fell at exactly the same speed my shit did after it left my ass hole and before it hit the back of your mouth.

;-)

Bojangles ago

Why don't you quit chimping out and answer his question, nigger?

DarkMath ago

"nigger" and his friend's name is @Antiracist2

you can't make this stuff up

Antiracist2 ago

Not like 9/11 conspiracies.

@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh

DarkMath ago

I'm sorry I took that extra Ex-Lax last night.

https://ex-lax.com/

You're an idiot but not a Pedophile............I hope.

Please accept my apology.

antiracist3 ago

WTC 7 did not free fall.

@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh

DarkMath ago

Dude the arguments over.

We disagree, You won't convince me. I won't convince you.

Move on with your life.

@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh

SarMegahhikkitha ago

What argument? You chimped out because you didn't expect him to make you learn science.

DarkMath ago

"What argument?"

Exactly. What argument is exactly the issue dipshits.

You don't see an argument BECAUSE YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT A STRAW MAN IS you fucktards.

SarMegahhikkitha ago

He linked you to stuff. You're saying the reason your angry is because the stuff he linked (which he didn't write) addresses the free-fall argument for all the towers and not just tower 7? Why not just address the argument for tower 7? It's only straw man if he's saying you're saying all the towers free fell. If anything it would be harder to disprove free-fall for all the towers over just tower 7.

When you tell a logician he doesn't "know" some fallacy every armchair redditor knows, you kinda automatically lose.

antiracist3 ago

I never even rephrased his argument for it to be a strawman. Even when I quoted his exact words, he added clarification like I was misrepresenting him.

Him. Clinton's cocaine.

Me: Clinton's cocaine.

Him: Clinton's CIA cocaine.

Ohhhhh, see if was being a dick when I said Clinton's cocaine because I was misrepresenting what he said entirely.

This isn't about rephrasing argument. It comes down simply to disagreement about empirical fact.

Despite us having all the same videos, there's simply no way for us to convince one another about the matter of freefall.

The evidence is simply too ambiguous, and experts from both sides have fierce ongoing debates about whether that building was in freefall or not.

@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh

DarkMath ago

"addresses the free-fall argument for all the towers and not just tower 7"

Yes. That's a Straw Man. And actually it also uses a logic fallacy called "Begging the Question".

I'm not going to waste my time with you dipshits. If you can be honest you'll figure out my point. You don't have to believe it.

As it is you fucktards are lost in the wilderness.

antiracist3 ago

The argument never took place.

@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh