Have you seen the kinds of things you guys are posting to Twitter? You're doxxing people and their families, much of the time with false accusations. What is Twitter going to do? Hope you get your act together? No, you've given the entire #Pizzagate movement an even worse name than it had to start with.
Face it, you dorks have blown it. The only way to end the madness is to stamp out the entire thing. You guys have had four months to expose something legit, and all you've done is harass a bunch of pizza shop owners and plaster photos of their kids all over the Internet with unsubstantiated accusations that they're pimping or molesting them.
What did you expect was going to happen? The world was going to buy into the hysteria?
Nothing in that Tweet actually violates the Twitter rule set, read it for yourself, these are public officials being correlated with publicly available information (OSINT). This is a war, while they do this to our side they allow assassination threats & mass social engineering of directive negativity to go wild -- wake up.
Harassment: You may not incite or engage in the targeted abuse or harassment of others.
Spam: You may not use the Twitter service for the purpose of spamming anyone. What constitutes “spamming” will evolve as we respond to new tricks and tactics by spammers. Some of the factors that we take into account when determining what conduct is considered to be spamming are:
if you repeatedly create false or misleading content;
Accounts not mentioned -- also different for public figures.
Linking someone to the Pizzagate conspiracy is indirectly encouraging harassment of that person because it makes them a target. Some of the people that are being targeted in this way are not "public figures". Brian Podesta, for example, is not a public figure, even if he is related to one.
Uh, no. Not misleading, only an assertive question, a demand for answers.
The "false or misleading content" rule is part of the "spam" rule. Almost all of the entirely of Pizzagate is false or misleading. (Just because you believe it doesn't make it true. If Twitter arrives at the conclusion that it isn't true, that's all that matters.)
Deflecting -- Arun Rao & Eric Holder are public figures open to scrutiny, of which there is more of a substantiated claim than there is in direct contrast to unwarranted claims which are allowed to run amok about Donald Trump or Jeff Sessions for political reasons. Brian Podesta may not be in the public light but certain people such as himself being in the right places is a necessary structure within the argument, thus, it is irrelevant to whether they are harmed or not in the process. They are enemies to some of us regardless.
Oh my, yes since I practice the disciplines of OSINT & SIGINT regularly -- I am well aware of the difference between belief & evidence. I know you're working for CTR, but you guys suck & as courtesy -- here is some free advice bud. If you pressure your enemy with certain information, reactions, or people or material coming forward can result in more evidence due to that tactic. Very simple, but I know you guys aren't the brightest, so you probably couldn't implement it.
Yes, Twitter does arrive at certain "conclusions," some of which have made it less of a business & more of a political weapon -- of which it is abetting terrorism by doing so.
Deflecting -- Arun Rao & Eric Holder are public figures
Actually, you've successfully derailed me on the public figure thing. Let's go back to what you said before:
also different for public figures
I don't think anything that qualifies as "harassment" would be excused by Twitter simply because your target is a public figure. It was my mistake to try to defend the non-public-figure examples; the truth is that by targeting people in the course of Pizzagate, you're a part of the force that is actively encouraging and enabling harassment. The bottom line is that this is probably how Twitter sees it, and they're the final word.
I know you're working for CTR
You realize I'm never going to take you seriously if you accuse me of working for someone I don't work for, right?
If you know I'm "working for CTR" and I know I'm not working for CTR (or anyone, for that matter), then it's pretty obvious to me that you're an idiot. Do you know how stupid people sound when they accuse you of being a shill and you know that you're not one because if anyone knows whether or not you're a shill, it's you.
Nuh-uh, still wrong, Twitter sanctions certain harassment as long as it is directed within their own political aims -- thus they no longer function as a business but in name. This is why one of the reasons they are going to be sued is due to antitrust violations. Oh, by the way, I see you have missed my point about using pressure to harvest reactionary evidence. What a shame, you think I actually care about these people being harassed, that is amusing.
Final word for sure, though the fact that they are an enemy is not news, the capacity at which they must harm themselves to enforce their political aims is however.
Debate? This is a war, you think I care if you think you're not taking me seriously -- even though by all appearances you are on here with a sock account crying defending Twitter which suggests the complete opposite of your claim? This isn't so much anything but sport to waste your time aye.
Also no, as we dox people we find out which ones are employed with CTR/ShareBlue, keep that in mind.
Twitter sanctions certain harassment as long as it is directed within their own political aims
Probably true, I see no reason to disagree with that. If the argument were about whether or not Twitter has a partisan bias in its policy enforcement practices, I wouldn't be arguing against.
This is a war
He who lives by the sword dies by the sword.
you think I actually care about these people being harassed
At least you're being honest. Good to know the nature of the beast.
No fella, you got it the wrong way round. Of course the general public arent professional investigators, of course that results in collateral damage. But that is a necessary function of the people having to resort to defending THEIR OWN PUBLIC SAFETY in the instance of law enforcement being corrupted and NOT DOING ITS JOB.
The collateral damage is on the corrupt govt, not this community
James Alefantis doesn't have kids you fucking dolt. He is a faggot with no kids, claims he hates kids, and then posts nothing but pictures of kids all over his Instagram. Is that normal to you, you pedo-enabling piece of shit? Is that normal to you, to have pictures of little girls with their hands taped to tables? You are the one who is delusional. Go crawl back in your Mainstream Media hole, nigger.
view the rest of the comments →
The_Kuru ago
That wasn't Rao. Rao was AUSA long after this cp viewer was kicked out.
PizzaGateFullRetard ago
Good thing they did all that fact-checking before blowing a load all over Twitter. And they wonder why Twitter keeps deleting their posts.
Orlando_Kek_Follower ago
Twitter has started suspending all accounts mentioning PizzaGate, Podesta, any of it. I got banned this morning.
PizzaGateFullRetard ago
Have you seen the kinds of things you guys are posting to Twitter? You're doxxing people and their families, much of the time with false accusations. What is Twitter going to do? Hope you get your act together? No, you've given the entire #Pizzagate movement an even worse name than it had to start with.
Face it, you dorks have blown it. The only way to end the madness is to stamp out the entire thing. You guys have had four months to expose something legit, and all you've done is harass a bunch of pizza shop owners and plaster photos of their kids all over the Internet with unsubstantiated accusations that they're pimping or molesting them.
What did you expect was going to happen? The world was going to buy into the hysteria?
Stormer-chan ago
Nothing in that Tweet actually violates the Twitter rule set, read it for yourself, these are public officials being correlated with publicly available information (OSINT). This is a war, while they do this to our side they allow assassination threats & mass social engineering of directive negativity to go wild -- wake up.
[ https://support.twitter.com/articles/18311 ]
PizzaGateFullRetard ago
Stormer-chan ago
PizzaGateFullRetard ago
Linking someone to the Pizzagate conspiracy is indirectly encouraging harassment of that person because it makes them a target. Some of the people that are being targeted in this way are not "public figures". Brian Podesta, for example, is not a public figure, even if he is related to one.
The "false or misleading content" rule is part of the "spam" rule. Almost all of the entirely of Pizzagate is false or misleading. (Just because you believe it doesn't make it true. If Twitter arrives at the conclusion that it isn't true, that's all that matters.)
Stormer-chan ago
Deflecting -- Arun Rao & Eric Holder are public figures open to scrutiny, of which there is more of a substantiated claim than there is in direct contrast to unwarranted claims which are allowed to run amok about Donald Trump or Jeff Sessions for political reasons. Brian Podesta may not be in the public light but certain people such as himself being in the right places is a necessary structure within the argument, thus, it is irrelevant to whether they are harmed or not in the process. They are enemies to some of us regardless.
Oh my, yes since I practice the disciplines of OSINT & SIGINT regularly -- I am well aware of the difference between belief & evidence. I know you're working for CTR, but you guys suck & as courtesy -- here is some free advice bud. If you pressure your enemy with certain information, reactions, or people or material coming forward can result in more evidence due to that tactic. Very simple, but I know you guys aren't the brightest, so you probably couldn't implement it.
Yes, Twitter does arrive at certain "conclusions," some of which have made it less of a business & more of a political weapon -- of which it is abetting terrorism by doing so.
[ https://twitter.com/JennyCarminati/status/836788807814918144 ]
Have a nice day ShareBlue, hope you're looking forward to RaHoWa, /Baphomet/ says hi.
PizzaGateFullRetard ago
Actually, you've successfully derailed me on the public figure thing. Let's go back to what you said before:
I don't think anything that qualifies as "harassment" would be excused by Twitter simply because your target is a public figure. It was my mistake to try to defend the non-public-figure examples; the truth is that by targeting people in the course of Pizzagate, you're a part of the force that is actively encouraging and enabling harassment. The bottom line is that this is probably how Twitter sees it, and they're the final word.
You realize I'm never going to take you seriously if you accuse me of working for someone I don't work for, right?
If you know I'm "working for CTR" and I know I'm not working for CTR (or anyone, for that matter), then it's pretty obvious to me that you're an idiot. Do you know how stupid people sound when they accuse you of being a shill and you know that you're not one because if anyone knows whether or not you're a shill, it's you.
Here, have your get-out-of-argument-free card.
Stormer-chan ago
Nuh-uh, still wrong, Twitter sanctions certain harassment as long as it is directed within their own political aims -- thus they no longer function as a business but in name. This is why one of the reasons they are going to be sued is due to antitrust violations. Oh, by the way, I see you have missed my point about using pressure to harvest reactionary evidence. What a shame, you think I actually care about these people being harassed, that is amusing.
Final word for sure, though the fact that they are an enemy is not news, the capacity at which they must harm themselves to enforce their political aims is however.
Debate? This is a war, you think I care if you think you're not taking me seriously -- even though by all appearances you are on here with a sock account crying defending Twitter which suggests the complete opposite of your claim? This isn't so much anything but sport to waste your time aye.
Also no, as we dox people we find out which ones are employed with CTR/ShareBlue, keep that in mind.
PizzaGateFullRetard ago
Probably true, I see no reason to disagree with that. If the argument were about whether or not Twitter has a partisan bias in its policy enforcement practices, I wouldn't be arguing against.
He who lives by the sword dies by the sword.
At least you're being honest. Good to know the nature of the beast.
MolochHunter ago
No fella, you got it the wrong way round. Of course the general public arent professional investigators, of course that results in collateral damage. But that is a necessary function of the people having to resort to defending THEIR OWN PUBLIC SAFETY in the instance of law enforcement being corrupted and NOT DOING ITS JOB.
The collateral damage is on the corrupt govt, not this community
PizzaGateFullRetard ago
Wow. That's some seriously brain-damaged rationalizing right there. You're a danger to society.
MolochHunter ago
im am a danger to a corrupt society, and an ally to a just one. Get the fuck out of my way
Stormer-chan ago
This.
Orlando_Kek_Follower ago
James Alefantis doesn't have kids you fucking dolt. He is a faggot with no kids, claims he hates kids, and then posts nothing but pictures of kids all over his Instagram. Is that normal to you, you pedo-enabling piece of shit? Is that normal to you, to have pictures of little girls with their hands taped to tables? You are the one who is delusional. Go crawl back in your Mainstream Media hole, nigger.
MostPostersAreShills ago
Omg how did a shill get to this board. Can you please just fucking leave fuck I hate shills.