Please everyone I need you to chip in, to archive everything on this guy! As much as you can, as fast as you can. Now that this is out he'll soon know he's being scrutinized. All his social media and online presence needs to be backed up. I've only done a small amount, there is a lot.
I'm just gonna shamelessly leech off your comment's visibility. Thanks for posting this stuff, bruh. You must be new to the internet and human experience in general, only 12 days. How adorable!
If he's hurt children, that's one thing. But this stuff he's painting isn't real, as in it's NOT real children, unless he's used children as reference? But prove that first. Yeah, these paintings aren't that appealing, so just avert your eyes, m'kay? Personally, I think some of em are fucking hilarious -- the Ronald McDonald one especially.
All you babies must be pretty shocked given it's your first week on the internet, but here's my point: At what point do we say "it's okay to burn THESE books, but NOT these books"?
That's right, it's a question without an easy answer. I say stop burning books altogether. Just stop. All you morally righteous outrage-Orwells need to get off your high horses first. I'd read the interview that was linked in the thread. Some interesting things the artist says:
SC: Do you get feelings of guilt from doing this work?
SM: Oh yeah.
SC: But you’ve said acting out any of those images is impossible for you.
SM: Yeah, it’s impossible for me for many reasons. Growing up disabled, I know what it’s like to have a rough time of it as a kid. For me to impose adult sexuality on a kid would be impossible to do. But I do think I am a pervert.
"It's clear the individual has questionable fetishes." Yeah, no shit, Freud.
What the faggot paints in the privacy of his own home is none of our fucking business. This is a distraction from ACTUAL human trafficking and REAL pedophiles, who actually hurt children. Right? Or do I deserve the noose too for speaking too many uncomfortable words?
Don't tell other people what words they can and can't use, or what they are and aren't allowed to paint. His style's shit as it is, doesn't understand value or how to use color. He doesn't need authoritarian cultural marxists to tell him that.
And, yeah, his art normalizes pedophilia like FPS games normalize gun violence. Grow the fuck up, you crybaby millennial dipshits. Think for one fucking second, and lurk more, bitch. 12 days. Get the fuck out of here, or respond. I'm here till Friday.
I agree with you EXCEPT, there is absolutely no need for this to be paid for with taxpayer money. That shit has got to stop. There should just not be arts funding if we can't draw the line and stop making Christians pay for
"Jesus in a Urine Bottle" and Buddists paying for "The Rape of Ghandi" and atheists paying for "A White House Christmas" and etc. Because I also don't want to pay for this shit EVER - http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/modern-art-was-cia-weapon-1578808.html
Yeah, that's a whole discussion in itself. I don't think the arts and humanities should be funded by the state. It actually limits freedom of expression, I think.
Turns out as I read further, the Bush Foundation is supposedly not related to government funding but was put together by an "Archie and Edith" Bush. Ok so no taxpayer funds here, but seriously, how does this "philanthropy" do anything but inflict new levels of pedo porn on our eyeballs. Anyway I am sick of the holier-than-thous and glad to see someone else taking them on, I went round and round with a lot of them about how ever star in the sky or in a decorating scheme isn't SAAATAAAN coming to get us. ::eye roll::
view the rest of the comments →
debeauvoir21 ago
Please everyone I need you to chip in, to archive everything on this guy! As much as you can, as fast as you can. Now that this is out he'll soon know he's being scrutinized. All his social media and online presence needs to be backed up. I've only done a small amount, there is a lot.
chance_pictures ago
I'm just gonna shamelessly leech off your comment's visibility. Thanks for posting this stuff, bruh. You must be new to the internet and human experience in general, only 12 days. How adorable!
If he's hurt children, that's one thing. But this stuff he's painting isn't real, as in it's NOT real children, unless he's used children as reference? But prove that first. Yeah, these paintings aren't that appealing, so just avert your eyes, m'kay? Personally, I think some of em are fucking hilarious -- the Ronald McDonald one especially.
All you babies must be pretty shocked given it's your first week on the internet, but here's my point: At what point do we say "it's okay to burn THESE books, but NOT these books"?
That's right, it's a question without an easy answer. I say stop burning books altogether. Just stop. All you morally righteous outrage-Orwells need to get off your high horses first. I'd read the interview that was linked in the thread. Some interesting things the artist says:
"It's clear the individual has questionable fetishes." Yeah, no shit, Freud.
What the faggot paints in the privacy of his own home is none of our fucking business. This is a distraction from ACTUAL human trafficking and REAL pedophiles, who actually hurt children. Right? Or do I deserve the noose too for speaking too many uncomfortable words?
Don't tell other people what words they can and can't use, or what they are and aren't allowed to paint. His style's shit as it is, doesn't understand value or how to use color. He doesn't need authoritarian cultural marxists to tell him that.
And, yeah, his art normalizes pedophilia like FPS games normalize gun violence. Grow the fuck up, you crybaby millennial dipshits. Think for one fucking second, and lurk more, bitch. 12 days. Get the fuck out of here, or respond. I'm here till Friday.
VieBleu ago
I agree with you EXCEPT, there is absolutely no need for this to be paid for with taxpayer money. That shit has got to stop. There should just not be arts funding if we can't draw the line and stop making Christians pay for "Jesus in a Urine Bottle" and Buddists paying for "The Rape of Ghandi" and atheists paying for "A White House Christmas" and etc. Because I also don't want to pay for this shit EVER - http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/modern-art-was-cia-weapon-1578808.html
chance_pictures ago
Yeah, that's a whole discussion in itself. I don't think the arts and humanities should be funded by the state. It actually limits freedom of expression, I think.
VieBleu ago
Turns out as I read further, the Bush Foundation is supposedly not related to government funding but was put together by an "Archie and Edith" Bush. Ok so no taxpayer funds here, but seriously, how does this "philanthropy" do anything but inflict new levels of pedo porn on our eyeballs. Anyway I am sick of the holier-than-thous and glad to see someone else taking them on, I went round and round with a lot of them about how ever star in the sky or in a decorating scheme isn't SAAATAAAN coming to get us. ::eye roll::