You get it. Its like with the jewish thing and child molesting/sacrifice. People dont want to hear the truth, but both jews and gays admit to pedophilia in their own words
If we want to really unearth the true source of the problems here we have to be precise. Like performing surgery on the body of humanity... if we want to remove the gallbladder we can't just say "oh its in that stomach area over there, just dive right in" :D
We can't just say. "oh all them jews are taking all the worlds money. GET EM!" or "oh all them gays are taking all our childrens. GET EM!"
are there a higher percentage of Jews within the shadow elite? perhaps. Is that due to inherent biological differences? I would argue no. It has more to do with the timing of world developments and the location of groups as the world coalesced.
Using shadow elite as example... You can perhaps say that Jewish population back in the day had slighly higher percentage of "will to power" compared to other sub groups, but to claim that a shadow elite formed because they were Jewish is incorrect.
Jews make up less than 2% of the US population, yet make up 48% of the list of the country's richest people. This isn't a coincidence, it's an exclusive club.
The vast majority of Jews are just regular people like you or me, but they are massively over-represented among the world elite, and many are the driving forces behind the globalist agenda. It's just easier to say "the Jews" than to constantly clarify in regards to Zionists, globalist Jews, fake Jews etc.
My point (and it's not fact or anything but I think it's true) is that the reason that number is so high isn't necessarily because inherent differences in humanity.
Say for example... at the start of the period in time where monetary control became possible, instead of the subset of humans knows as Jews being located in the area that allowed them to flourish it was an ethnicity called ZIMBABWEANS lol. In this artificial scenario, since the Zimbabweans happened to exist in this particular region during the rise of monetary rule (whatever you want to call it) it is now these Zimbabweans that own a majority of the globes wealth. Would you then conclude that these people were rich due to ethnicity or due to the composite of external factors that created the conditions for them to do so?
view the rest of the comments →
herbsmoke ago
You get it. Its like with the jewish thing and child molesting/sacrifice. People dont want to hear the truth, but both jews and gays admit to pedophilia in their own words
druhill007 ago
If we want to really unearth the true source of the problems here we have to be precise. Like performing surgery on the body of humanity... if we want to remove the gallbladder we can't just say "oh its in that stomach area over there, just dive right in" :D
We can't just say. "oh all them jews are taking all the worlds money. GET EM!" or "oh all them gays are taking all our childrens. GET EM!"
are there a higher percentage of Jews within the shadow elite? perhaps. Is that due to inherent biological differences? I would argue no. It has more to do with the timing of world developments and the location of groups as the world coalesced.
Using shadow elite as example... You can perhaps say that Jewish population back in the day had slighly higher percentage of "will to power" compared to other sub groups, but to claim that a shadow elite formed because they were Jewish is incorrect.
That make sense?
roundhouse1776 ago
Jews make up less than 2% of the US population, yet make up 48% of the list of the country's richest people. This isn't a coincidence, it's an exclusive club.
The vast majority of Jews are just regular people like you or me, but they are massively over-represented among the world elite, and many are the driving forces behind the globalist agenda. It's just easier to say "the Jews" than to constantly clarify in regards to Zionists, globalist Jews, fake Jews etc.
druhill007 ago
I hear you on that point.
My point (and it's not fact or anything but I think it's true) is that the reason that number is so high isn't necessarily because inherent differences in humanity.
Say for example... at the start of the period in time where monetary control became possible, instead of the subset of humans knows as Jews being located in the area that allowed them to flourish it was an ethnicity called ZIMBABWEANS lol. In this artificial scenario, since the Zimbabweans happened to exist in this particular region during the rise of monetary rule (whatever you want to call it) it is now these Zimbabweans that own a majority of the globes wealth. Would you then conclude that these people were rich due to ethnicity or due to the composite of external factors that created the conditions for them to do so?