You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

huhhh ago

Well unfortunately AJ has proven himself time and time again over the years to be a gatekeeper and at no point was it more blatantly obvious than with pizzagate. It's tough to come to terms with but once you do you will have reached the next level of "truthdom". Infowars is a limited hangout. Like I said the other day, pizzagate should have been infowars wet dream, but they've skirted around it the best they could. I finally unsubscribed a month or so ago when I realized and I've been better off for it. Don't get me wrong though, I thoroughly enjoyed the infowars election coverage. They do put out some good stuff but a great deal of it is a distraction from the REAL shit.

stellarcorpse ago

Thank you for your honest reply. It is rather heartbreaking in a way. I have always defended AJ against claims that he was controlled opposition and what not but I have finally reached my zenith with his reaction (or non reaction) to pizzagate.

Kindly upvoat me since I am being outnumbered so far .

huhhh ago

We're in the same boat. It was only 3 - 6 months ago I was arguing with people calling them crazy for thinking AJ was controlled opp.

stellarcorpse ago

may I ask you what you think is going on here? Why does he mention Clinton's & Podesta's but is afraid of Alefantis? Do you not find that weird? Life threatened or that of family? Or some other agenda? (Though from the get go he has been fairly hands off about pizzagate in general. )Thank you.

V____Z ago

You didn't ask me, but what I've surmised is that like his interview with the lawyer who supposedly witnessed the supposed shooting (of a hard drive in a closet!?), he is helping with a psyop and is going to lead us to believe we will get in big trouble for talking about Alefantis. He is working with Alefantis, which is the same as working with CIA, so it's really not a stretch.

The deep state isn't going to allow a real truth teller to have a huge media presence - he's not their enemy, he works for them.

stellarcorpse ago

Exactally. Which leads me back to the argument I am having with Kawksnahsch above me who claims Alefantis is a nobody & a distraction just like AJ does. What if the exact opposite is true? What if AJ is the one actually doing the distracting AWAY from CPP? What if CPP is not the DISTRACTION but the main ATTRACTION? The more JA gets away with things, the more I do entertain the idea he is CIA related. With AJ, I have no idea. I really am not ready to accept yet that he could be working on the other side. I find that hard to believe because he is a massive Trump supporter and I think Trump is against DEEP STATE . But hell, I don't know anymore. You may be right. Nothing with AJ and pizzagate makes sense anymore. If he were being threatened I would personally react different. But what if he is being threatened to say what he has to say? I mean like instructed? Or else...

V____Z ago

He is an act. He says what he needs to say. He 'supports' Trump because he has a certain audience he caters too, but does he give Trump a bad name by attaching himself to him? Interesting. The CIA wanted Hillary. Now Trump is smeared by the fact that he had talked aith Alex in the past. Alex is used to smear anything he touches, and he doesn't exactly fight against being used like that. He doesn't try to act sane.

As for Alefantis, I can't understand arguments that we ignore him completely, nor would i support the idea of focusing on him explicitly. I've never heard arguments for the latter, and those saying to ignore him show their true colors right away.

stellarcorpse ago

Agree 100%.