You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

huhhh ago

Well unfortunately AJ has proven himself time and time again over the years to be a gatekeeper and at no point was it more blatantly obvious than with pizzagate. It's tough to come to terms with but once you do you will have reached the next level of "truthdom". Infowars is a limited hangout. Like I said the other day, pizzagate should have been infowars wet dream, but they've skirted around it the best they could. I finally unsubscribed a month or so ago when I realized and I've been better off for it. Don't get me wrong though, I thoroughly enjoyed the infowars election coverage. They do put out some good stuff but a great deal of it is a distraction from the REAL shit.

NotHereForPizza ago

I would gladly follow the bandwagon here if it wasn't for the Joe Rogan podcast where he went ham.

Don't get me wrong, I'd like to hear more about AJ being a shill.

huhhh ago

I've never heard of that incident, all I can say is don't let that fool you. I'm no expert on AJ either and he is still part curiosity to me. Is he a total plant for Israel and the CIA? Did he start out legit and get corrupted along the way? I don't know, somehow I imagine it's a bit of both, though that makes no sense. All we know is that AJ isn't the truth warrior we all hoped he was and he is no doubt gatekeeping to some degree.

NotHereForPizza ago

Meh. Not at all convinced, although I want to state again that I'm certainly open to the idea. FBIAnon put it best, i believe, when he stated that AJ may just be a useful idiot.

It's my estimation that FBIAnon considers AJ's affinity for information marketing to be admirable while also believing that he doesn't exactly have all the information (maybe just not yet, though), or (and I think this is more likely) he's been partially duped in some way.

huhhh ago

Believe what you arrive at my friend.

NotHereForPizza ago

Come on, you've established your narrative. It's plain to see.

The hard truth that's actually involved here, is that skepticism is not only healthy, but absolutely crucial to defining truth.

When you dismiss a conversation before it begins, you essentially concede in the debate world.

huhhh ago

Did I say you were wrong? No, I told you my opinion and you told me yours. Instead of trying to convince you that you're wrong or that I'm right I said we will have to come to our own conclusions. What's the problem?

NotHereForPizza ago

Ad hominem and dismissal are a shill's tools, friend.

You called him a gatekeeper, infowars a limited hangout, and referred to the whole thing as a distraction.

Then:

Believe what you arrive at my friend.

Is something you say to a child when they've lost a toy and insist you have it.

huhhh ago

Oh cram it dummy. In this case I actually meant "my friend" in a friendly non condescending way. He's a total gatekeeper imo, why do you think infowars has done so little on pizzagate? And why did it take them so long to cover it? People in the know have called AJ a gatekeeper for years and for good reason. I'll say it again and it's a cliché, but: "The best way to control your opposition is to lead it", don't think they aren't utilizing that little tidbit. We all have questions and we all try to find the answers. Cool your jets, friend ;)