You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Jem777 ago

The judgement of some is very Harsh.. for those who did not follow David at the time. He had a column at Huffington Post and wrote fair stories for both sides.

His stories were published there and many other places Including magazines. He was the only reporter in the MSM at that point who dared to Report anything at all to challenge HRC. He had enough clout to get a response from everyone & independent journalists when he dared asking HRC health after collapsing at 9-11. They savagely came after him. He would not retract so they took his job His and YouTube. Then De-monetized everything, shut down paypal and personally called out his name. Jake Tapper warned him openly.

He stuck to PG research. He was the major player in the beginning for those lost in election. He put together all the Original YouTube videos they were destroyed. They cancelled his Twitter completely and he went to Gab. He never quit. He was obviously scared to death at the fact he was getting personally attacked by government Media who had TopSecret clearance.

For those of you "heroes" out there who have attacked him you might think twice. When most were not following yet he already called out J.A. & Podesta personally.

He was threatened, he has been the truth teller. Not his fan but we all watch and so do they.

I am praying he is safe and goes to protection. Think twice about joking

HarveyKlinger ago

I was following him in the beginning and you proved my earlier points that he is not a journalist. A journalist reports facts and evidence. He has been reckless with his accusations. It's only because he's small change that they haven't come after him and sued him for everything he claims to own. He has "called out" John Podesta and JA on numerous occasions and proclaimed they were child molestors, satanists, pedophiles, killers, etc without a shred of evidence. No real journalist would be that stupid. If anybody took him seriously he'd have been sued for defamation by now. He's never presented anything resembling facts or evidence. I stopped following him when his accusations got more wild and instead of evidence, he shilled for donations. Fuck him. He's a fraud - as a journalist, a researcher, and a person.

V____Z ago

If he has been reckless with accusations, i expect there will be libel suits shortly. Then you will be validated. Until then you sound like a bitter know-nothing at best.

HarveyKlinger ago

LOL. Not a single person on here can point to any of David's accusations towards John Podesta and back it up with provable, verifiable facts. Can you?

Forgetmenot ago

Podesta has not provided an alibi on his whereabouts when Madeline macann disapear d. Podesta has exercised his right to remain silent and not offered any explanation regarding the pedo code words in his emails. Podesta fraternizes with known pedofiles. Hastert, epstein, wiener, bean, clintons. Podesta acts like a pedofile, he uses pedofile code words and he is unable to provide an alibi. He seems very guilty and he seems to be hiding something.

HarveyKlinger ago

And not a single shred of that would convict him in a court or even get a grand jury to spend 10 minutes on investigating him. But I have to ask the obvious question. Why does he need to provide an alibi to his whereabouts? Was he ever asked? Do you think he needs to come to VOAT and answer to every statement made about him? That's ridiculous. Knowing pedophiles doesn't make him a pedophile. Saying someone acts like a pedophile doesn't mean he IS a pedophile. When was he asked about the pedophile code words?

If he's hiding something, he's hiding in plain sight. And remember, here in the US a person is innocent until PROVEN guilty in a court of law. What reason would he have to entertain a bunch of internet kiddies with an AMA? I don't disagree that his code words are pretty tough to find a logical explanation for and I think he's creepy as fuck. But none of that proves guilt and if he got a hard on for killing this investigation, he could start suing the shit out of everybody here for slander. He's taking the Obama approach and just ignoring it because if he answers a single thing about it he gives it credibility. Pretend you are JP for a minute in both situations - innocent and guilty. What would you do in both situations? The answer is the same for both - ignore it and hope it blows over.

Forgetmenot ago

Lol he has not been charged yet genius. Presumption of innocence does not apply until he gets charged. 2. The burden of proof is not on the prosecution until he gets charged. 3. He is an attorney and he knows exactly to avoid the investigation and remain silent. He knows the evidence will be used against him. There are no explanation his silence is loud and clear. 4. If he was innocent he would have cleared the air a long time instead of using hiring shills like you to defend him. 5. His associations with known pedofiles are evidence of a network and yes that is admissible as evidence. 6. His email code words are evidence and emails are admissible as evidence. 7. His lack of an alibi is also evidence. 8. When he sits in front of a jury and exercises his right to remain silent the jury will consider him guilty as well. 9. When you compare him to obama another criminal who has been proven to submit forged legal documents you are not doing podesta any favors. He is guilty until he gets his day in court, then he will be afforded the right to be presumed innocent. No one here is a judge, no one here is a jury, and no one here is a prosecutor. We are not bound by those rules. This is probable cause, and as long as he stays quiet he is guilty. In fact he has to stay quiet, because he is guilty, he knows we have only scratched the surface, imagine when a search warrants is able to pull bank records, and phone records, and god knows what else! Keep shilling for your boy, even hiring you makes him seem guilty! He will never sue because then they will have to go through Discovery process and that will enter all the evidence before a court. There is no going backwards after that. He would have sued for slander months ago. Remember when they accused assange of being a pedofiles he immediately issued a statement and threatened to sue unless an apology was issued. That is the action of a person who is falsely accused. You and your boy are scumbags and you both will reap what you sow. Death to pedofiles!

HarveyKlinger ago

Your diatribe just called for vigilante justice, which makes you a moron. But I have to ask the REALLY obvious question. Who or what the fuck are you talking about here, "Keep shilling for your boy, even hiring you makes him seem guilty!" If you are referring to John Podesta, you clearly are a fucking moron. I've been here since the beginning and have never defended him or JA. I fucking do law work (I'm not a lawyer) and am only pointing out that until someone is PROVEN guilty, it's defamation of character. So since you have stated he IS guilty of being a murderous pedophile, please provide evidence that he is. EVIDENCE that is not circumstantial or assumed because some wild accusation hasn't been disproven yet. Go ahead smartass, PROVE something. ANYTHING.

Based on your idiotic post, you clearly know nothing about the law. You suggested more than once that a person is GUILTY until charged. What the fuck? And you keep mentioning that his lack of PG acknowledgement and a public proof of innocence is all you need to KNOW that he is guilty. As far as I'm aware, and please correct me if I'm wrong, but not only has he not been charged with anything, he hasn't even been fucking asked about it. So in your tiny little mind, if a person doesn't answer a question he's never asked, the person must be guilty of EVERYTHING IMAGINABLE? The Salem Witch Trials made more sense than the bullshit you spent WAY too long putting in words.

Be honest. Are you blowing David Seaman or have the hots for him? You're defending him and attacking others who don't love him as much as you do like a jealous ex-girlfriend.