http://edibleschoolyard.org/team#block-views-view-our-team-esyp-advisory
It looks like our prime suspect, promoter of children and pizza on Instagram, has used his hobbies for charitable purposes.
- Alice Waters is perhaps the most important chef on the west coast and one of the most important in the United States. She runs a restaurant called Chez Panisse. Notice the parallel lettering to Comet Ping Pong.
- Located in the heart of the Democratic Party base, the Berkeley-organization is directly involved with helping children grow vegetables in schools.
- Of all the people on the "projects board", Alefantis is the only one who doesn't live in California.
- Other board members include Meryl Streep, Robert Redford, Alice Walker, Eleanor Coppola, Jamie Oliver, Bette Middler
- Podesta is also known to Alice Waters
- Walis Ahluwalia, connected to Rachel Chandler investigation, is also involved in the organization
- Edible Schoolyard NYC GALA includes Chelsea Clinton, David Rockefeller, Martha Stewart and many others.
- They have hosted events together and Politics & Prose and Buck's
If this doesn't connect Alefantis to the Rockefellers, Hollywood actors, bankers, globalists, artists, journalists, politicians and celebrity chefs, I don't know what does.
UPDATE:
Flagship Edible Schoolyard in Berkeley contains Wood-Fired Oven where they make pizzas for the kids. Where else have we seen that before?
view the rest of the comments →
sponiatowski ago
The evidence mounts. What an excellent find! You can tell a lot about a person by the company they keep...and James sure does like to keep his interests around schoolyards, doesn't he. And what is all this crap about "eating children" and "edible children" and "eating babies ice cream". What a horrendous thing to contemplate? I may discuss it once or twice as a joke, but this is just too much of a bad taste thing. Keep up the good work!
dmthirdeye ago
They know people want food thats not poison so they gotta get into that market and poison people with natural cage free shit now..... What the fuck is wrong with these people
sponiatowski ago
I think they want the children they abuse to be as close to nature as possible. I don't even think they want cigarette smoke wafting over them because it destroys their appetite. It's like they are growing and harvesting human children for their appetites. Do you think that whole smoke-free movement that was so successful was to make children more appealing? Protect the children from second-hand smoke to make them more appetizing to pedophiles, organ harvesters and cannibals! Sick!
Votescam ago
The anti-smoking campaign was in response to the medical costs for the increasing numbers of citizens being diagnosed with Cancer -- especially of the throat. Let's hope that it has saved some Americans from that fate. 1 in every 3 Americans now has Cancer.
sponiatowski ago
Cancer cases have risen even though no one smokes anymore. At least that's the last I heard from Fox News. Cancer has risen. I don't think the life of one single child was saved. I'm sure their clean blood and organs are now more in demand than ever before. And George Soros and David Rockefeller and the Rothchilds just keep on going, don't they. I think they tricked us into making our organs and children more marketable to organ harvesters. It's not just about the sex. And it was the Clinton's who doubled down on the anti-smoking campaigns. Aren't they a caring, concerned couple. Just ask in Haiti how caring and concerned they are in fact.
Votescam ago
What are you saying . . . that you think we should allow children/citizens to be encouraged to smoke? Or that we should continue to subsidize the tobacco industry? Of course cases continue to rise as former smokers age. Even if you gave up smoking 30 years ago, you're still likely to come down with cancer. And I'm sure you've also heard of the destruction of nature on this planet and Global Warming? The things that destroy nature like toxic chemicals and use of petroleum based fertilizers on our vegetation since the end of WWII - and filthy air can also produce cancer. It's still 1 in every 3 citizens! Don't forget either chemtrails which have been put in our skies over the last 25-30 years (internationally, as well) where these chemicals then fall down to earth onto our soil, in our water, on all animal life and humans. You can think anything you want, but not much sense in what you're saying. Btw, Soros, Rockefeller, Rothchilds aren't liberals if that's what you're thinking. They are fascists/right wing. And same for the Clinton's -- I'm quite aware of Haiti and the Clintons and more Americans should be aware.
sponiatowski ago
I just think we should have been more defensive on a habit/product that has been used since the Renaissance hit Europe. Actually, it may be the discovery of tobacco that caused the Renaissance. Moderate tobacco use actually increases intelligence one point. Removing tobacco has turned us into sheep and heralded in the dumbing-down of the Western World. Here is an article on Vampires and Tobacco Use you may find interesting and why a blood drinking, organ steeling vampire may want its victims to be as clean as possible: The term "coffin nails" comes from the fact that once a vampire has been killed with a stake through his heart and his or her head cut off, every year, on the anniversary of the vampire's death, tobacco must be smoked while walking around the burial site or else the vampire may come back to life. Also, the taste of a smoker's blood is awful and even repels mosquitos. The Native Americans used tobacco to ward off evil spirits and as a sign of peace when meeting new people, probably to see if they are bloodsucking demons. There is a lot to the vampire legends the mandela effect has made us forget. Here is the PDF: https://kutztownenglish.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/jds_v1_1999_miller.pdf
Votescam ago
sponia -- I see you've answered my question about whether you'd like to encourage smoking: Affirmative
You sound like an actor pretending to be a doctor.
Good luck with the Vampires.
sponiatowski ago
Votescam, obviously you have a one track mind when it comes to tobacco. It should be extinguished and exterminated. But the facts I stated are still valid. Stating the facts is necessary for analysis and decision making. Therefore your reasoning: "Anyone that states a fact that is not anti-tobacco is therefore pro-smoking" proves that an unreasonable, non-fact driven movement exists that had the goal of eliminating tobacco use despite the actual facts. Very dictatorial and very "non-choice" and "non-freedom" driven. You prove my point that it was an irrational smear campaign based on the desired goal only, and not reason and not the facts. What the reason is behind the desired goal is yet to be determined, but shedding the light of truth and stating the facts should balance the issue. Remember, the best way to expose and eradicate the vampire is to expose the vampire to the "light of day" and hold what remains to the light of truth, also known as "all the facts". Sunlight is not a vampire's friend, nor is it yours.. Hiding amongst useful, unreasonable followers won't help for long.