Cannot find this on Voat, but see it has been archived before. Sorry for repost if it is. Combing through some old articles I stumble upon "Where D.C.'s A-listers go for vacation". The second person mention is John Podesta. His yearly vacation is there:
"John Podesta, Center for American Progress: “I am going to my condo in Truckee [Calif.], like I do every year — will sit on my porch and do conference calls 50 feet from where the Donner Party ate each other.”".
If Podesta wasn't under suspicions for this kind of stuff it could be passed as just weird or dark, but considering the situation, this seems to be showing his hand a lot more than previously thought.
The link is here: http://web.archive.org/web/20170218215605/http://www.politico.com/story/2009/06/where-dcs-a-listers-go-for-vacation-023151
view the rest of the comments →
LincolnsMullet ago
You could say, "Well, John has a dark sense of humor. Maybe he likes macabre things". I don't know John Podesta enough to understand what he considers humor, but from the Wikileaks e-mails he doesn't possess much of one. In that context this "joke" wouldn't mesh with the personality that we know of him.
And by itself, this is a non-issue. In the context of pizzagate and the photo he prominently displayed in his office: Podesta's Cannibalism this strikes me as an odd individual. I know plenty of "horror" fans who have their own art, etc. but don't prominently display or discuss in professional circles. The pic in his office is subtle enough to pass as art, which means he can display it without anyone saying anything. This isn't a SAW poster. He's displaying that picture because he believes in it in some way. It has a much deeper meaning.
truthtrain2 ago
You bring up a very pragmatic approach. Yeah we are not saying he is some cannibal because of this, we are saying this is not in the norm, and is piling up. It would be weird to see a person with this much fascination in these topics, especially how he voices it professionally as you say, and not actually be part of it. Time will tell..
LincolnsMullet ago
It's not out of the realm of possibility, but with the info we have it would be a big leap of faith. There needs to be more to link what we know and what we're trying to prove.
Most of the info we're seeing is painting a picture. I don't think most people here need any further convincing something sinister is going on. The next step is finding the missing links between what we know and what we believe is occuring. That's the hard part.
truthtrain2 ago
I totally agree with you. I was actually just reading old articles (looking into Tucker Carlson for non PG related stuff) and this came up. I figured I should share. Maybe we can separate stuff that paints a picture verses stuff that is incriminating evidence? With tags? Or idunnooo.
I have been lurking for a while and haven't seen a comprehensive compiled list of incriminating evidence citing past cases and precedents.Thanks for your input, it is super valid.
LincolnsMullet ago
This was a great find btw!
truthtrain2 ago
Thanks, first real contribution! :) Also, thanks for that sweet input on this investigation. I agree completely. There are plenty of points, but the connections are usually emotionally driven, misinfo, or some other form of mudda. I am working on maintaining objectivity for the sake of true progress.
LincolnsMullet ago
No no I don't mean to discourage your post by any means. This is all part of connecting the dots and building a case. As new information comes to light, old information may become relevant. Even in this case a seemingly innocuous comment in 2009 about the Donnor Party, which nobody even knew existed, now seems extremely macabre and dark considering what we know about Podesta.
I speak in generalities about people making conclusions based off these two items. Some people are quick to make the connection between this and actual cannabalism. That link is missing.