I have to admit what Milo said sounded pretty bad. However I can confidently say he said "young boy" he meant high school student and when he talked about "sexually mature 13 year old" he was loosely giving the clinical definition of the term pedophilia (cutoff age). How do I know this? Because those fucking cucks edited out the part where he said "the law is probably about right" when talking about the age of consent laws.

Still not convinced? Then I have a question for all of the heterosexual men out there. Which one(s) of these photos am I allowed to find attractive and which one(s) makes me sick in the head - this one, this one, this one, or this one?

I'm not trying to say what Milo said was right or wrong, I'm not trying to say should be and what shouldn't be allowed with high school age sexuality. I'm saying it's a different debate all together.

Pizzagate is about investigating the most vile and depraved human beings imaginable, complete and utter sickos. People who think dead children in their underwear is some kind of high art. People who think there is absolutely nothing wrong with trying to smuggle out non-orphan children out of Haiti. This Milo thing is a complete media hit job and a total distraction, don't fall for it.