Yes, it's all Salon's fault that Milo supports pederasty. Fucking Salon, making Milo say stupid shit like:
You’re misunderstanding what pedophilia means. Pedophilia is not a sexual attraction to somebody 13-years-old who is sexually mature. Pedophilia is attraction to children who have not reached puberty. Pedophilia is attraction to people who don’t have functioning sex organs yet. Who have not gone through puberty. Who are too young to be able (unclear and cut off by others)…That’s not what we are talking about. You don’t understand what pedophilia is if you are saying I’m defending it because I’m certainly not.
Those motherfuckers make me say stupid shit all the time too, fucking Salon!
Age of consent is 14 in many countries, 16 in the UK, you give it an arbitrary boundary but people mature at different times, that doesn't mean I agree with an adult fucking them but it's not the same as fucking an 8yr old, do you not understand nuance? The fact that many liberals hold this view with no repercussions lends credence to this is clearly a co-ordinated smear campaign to damage his popularity. http://archive.is/Dblxv
As for Weiner, as I see you've mentioned him, he sent lude pictures with a fucking baby in them and he actually committed a felony instead of just talking about the morality of pedastry. And that's ignoring what was supposedly on his laptop. False equivalence.
that doesn't mean I agree with an adult fucking them but it's not the same as fucking an 8yr old, do you not understand nuance
Absolutely I do, but I don't see a huge difference between 8 and 13 when it comes to being fucked by grown ass men.
The fact that many liberals hold this view with no repercussions lends credence to this is clearly a co-ordinated smear campaign to damage his popularity.
Those are HIS words. No one else put those words in his mouth. No one else made him speak them. And on BOTH shows, when called out for it, he talked about how WONDERFUL that kind of relationship can be(provided the 13 year old is sexually mature). That's fucked up, I don't care how you look at it. If you want to hero-worship him, fine, I think he's a sick individual.
he sent lude pictures with a fucking baby in them and he actually committed a felony
And WHY is what he did a felony? Care to answer that?
Inappropriate conduct with a minor with hard evidence for prosecution, isn't that obvious?
And I actually completely disagree with what he said, it was fucked, but the selective moral outrage from his opposition is laughable. Opinion =/= Pederast (or paedophile as they were erroneously claiming).
Inappropriate conduct with a minor with hard evidence for prosecution, isn't that obvious?
Yes, it is, but 'with a minor' is what I was trying to tease out of you. Under 18 is a minor, at least in the US.
And I actually completely disagree with what he said, it was fucked, but the selective moral outrage from his opposition is laughable.
Mine is not selective, it's based on his words, period, and as you agree, what he's saying is fucked up. It has nothing to do with selective editing, or late night streams while buzzed or anything like that. It was really disingenuous of him to couch this as all being about pedophilia and not these statements, as well.
Opinion =/= Pederast (or paedophile as they were erroneously claiming).
Again, I agreen, but APOLOGIZING/NORMALIZING that type of behavior is sick.
Milo's thoughts on paedophiles
Well aware of his thoughts on pedophiles and also that those thoughts DO NOT extend to pederasty.
view the rest of the comments →
p0ssum ago
Yes, it's all Salon's fault that Milo supports pederasty. Fucking Salon, making Milo say stupid shit like:
Those motherfuckers make me say stupid shit all the time too, fucking Salon!
AllianceFan ago
Age of consent is 14 in many countries, 16 in the UK, you give it an arbitrary boundary but people mature at different times, that doesn't mean I agree with an adult fucking them but it's not the same as fucking an 8yr old, do you not understand nuance? The fact that many liberals hold this view with no repercussions lends credence to this is clearly a co-ordinated smear campaign to damage his popularity. http://archive.is/Dblxv
As for Weiner, as I see you've mentioned him, he sent lude pictures with a fucking baby in them and he actually committed a felony instead of just talking about the morality of pedastry. And that's ignoring what was supposedly on his laptop. False equivalence.
p0ssum ago
Absolutely I do, but I don't see a huge difference between 8 and 13 when it comes to being fucked by grown ass men.
Those are HIS words. No one else put those words in his mouth. No one else made him speak them. And on BOTH shows, when called out for it, he talked about how WONDERFUL that kind of relationship can be(provided the 13 year old is sexually mature). That's fucked up, I don't care how you look at it. If you want to hero-worship him, fine, I think he's a sick individual.
And WHY is what he did a felony? Care to answer that?
AllianceFan ago
Inappropriate conduct with a minor with hard evidence for prosecution, isn't that obvious?
And I actually completely disagree with what he said, it was fucked, but the selective moral outrage from his opposition is laughable. Opinion =/= Pederast (or paedophile as they were erroneously claiming).
Milo's thoughts on paedophiles: http://imgur.com/f0zZzDf
p0ssum ago
Yes, it is, but 'with a minor' is what I was trying to tease out of you. Under 18 is a minor, at least in the US.
Mine is not selective, it's based on his words, period, and as you agree, what he's saying is fucked up. It has nothing to do with selective editing, or late night streams while buzzed or anything like that. It was really disingenuous of him to couch this as all being about pedophilia and not these statements, as well.
Again, I agreen, but APOLOGIZING/NORMALIZING that type of behavior is sick.
Well aware of his thoughts on pedophiles and also that those thoughts DO NOT extend to pederasty.
AllianceFan ago
I did not mean you in particular, but his inconsistent political opponents. I agree with everything in your post.