The sketches are all easily verifiable through Daily Mail, BBC, and other UK media outlets. The "sketch of 1 person" theory is probably just a red herring. That's like saying sketches of a dachshund and a bulldog look the same.
So NSW, or whatever policing powers that be, would never do something to bog down the investigation? I'm just saying there was pressure to release the efits, and pressure to keep a lid on it. The "happy medium" was saying it was 2 drawings of the same individual. Those two look nothing akin to the same person, anatomically speaking. Hell, they may not even have the same father. Who knows with these people.
The efit was of one man running towards the sea with a child. When the McCanns got back to England, Gerry was holding one of his twins the same way the Smith family saw the man running towards the sea.
The only other witness was a friend of the McCannns and her story was rubbish. She changed it multiple times and accused two people of being the abductor despite not seeing their face.
The details left out include the fact that the Smith family witnesses to the supposed abductor of Madeleine McCann, which were Martin Smith, his son Peter Smith, and daughter Aoife all clearly stated that they had no idea how the man looked like and could not recognize who the man was, or what his face looked like, even if they were given a photograph of him! Not only that but the efits were suppressed from the public for 6 YEARS and first released during a BBC Crimewatch TV program in which the investigator Any Redwoord URGED the public to find the man. Thus it is clear that the efits could NOT have been realistically be produced at all!
And:
This also means that the Podestas could not have been the kidnapper, but this doesn't take the Podestas off the hook either.
Did you even watch the video? That description makes it seem that it believes the 1 person stuff.
Am I missing something here? Please point me to exactly where the 1 person theory is proven fabrication - I thought it was fact due to media reports, and have been repeating it so.
I made that video.... I should've worded my above comment correctly. The efits were almost certainly a fabrication. The efits clearly look like two people made from two different computer programs, and just so happen to look like the Podestas (including the mole on Tony's forehead).
Thus saying the suspect was "one person" is the same as saying there were "10 people", i.e. none of it matters. The efits were almost certainly fabricated and look like two people (i.e. Podestas).
Thanks for asking. As explained in my last comment, I should have worded my first comment differently. The two efits are themselves debunked, as to being almost certainly fabricated. The Smith family had no idea how the man's face looked like and couldn't recognize him in a photograph (please watch from 18:51 of this video https://youtu.be/EIzjickYpEA?t=18m51s)), and the efits were released 6 years after the supposed disappearance, and created by private investigators the McCanns hired...
So what we have is two fake efits. They are supposed to describe "one suspect" but it clear that these efits were fake. Thus it is up to us to make our own judgments. The efits look like two people, on two different computer programs, and look like the Podestas (including the mole on Tony's forehead).
view the rest of the comments →
Blacksmith21 ago
The sketches are all easily verifiable through Daily Mail, BBC, and other UK media outlets. The "sketch of 1 person" theory is probably just a red herring. That's like saying sketches of a dachshund and a bulldog look the same.
AreWeSure ago
The UK police when they released the sketches were quite clear about them.
The sketch was of the same man as remembered by two different people and that man was 20-40 years old. What's your reasoning for Red Herring?
Blacksmith21 ago
So NSW, or whatever policing powers that be, would never do something to bog down the investigation? I'm just saying there was pressure to release the efits, and pressure to keep a lid on it. The "happy medium" was saying it was 2 drawings of the same individual. Those two look nothing akin to the same person, anatomically speaking. Hell, they may not even have the same father. Who knows with these people.
hir0ce1ine ago
The efit was of one man running towards the sea with a child. When the McCanns got back to England, Gerry was holding one of his twins the same way the Smith family saw the man running towards the sea.
The only other witness was a friend of the McCannns and her story was rubbish. She changed it multiple times and accused two people of being the abductor despite not seeing their face.
matheasysolutions ago
the 1 person theory is a complete fabrication (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIzjickYpEA))
cky_stew ago
TL:DW? - How was it fabricated?
Description says:
And:
Did you even watch the video? That description makes it seem that it believes the 1 person stuff.
Am I missing something here? Please point me to exactly where the 1 person theory is proven fabrication - I thought it was fact due to media reports, and have been repeating it so.
matheasysolutions ago
I made that video.... I should've worded my above comment correctly. The efits were almost certainly a fabrication. The efits clearly look like two people made from two different computer programs, and just so happen to look like the Podestas (including the mole on Tony's forehead).
Thus saying the suspect was "one person" is the same as saying there were "10 people", i.e. none of it matters. The efits were almost certainly fabricated and look like two people (i.e. Podestas).
I explain this more in Part 7 (https://youtu.be/GdNLuXMer8Y)) and you can see the full series here: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1593888
cky_stew ago
Thanks. I still don't see how it's debunked that the drawing is of more than one person though, which part of the video is it?
matheasysolutions ago
Thanks for asking. As explained in my last comment, I should have worded my first comment differently. The two efits are themselves debunked, as to being almost certainly fabricated. The Smith family had no idea how the man's face looked like and couldn't recognize him in a photograph (please watch from 18:51 of this video https://youtu.be/EIzjickYpEA?t=18m51s)), and the efits were released 6 years after the supposed disappearance, and created by private investigators the McCanns hired...
So what we have is two fake efits. They are supposed to describe "one suspect" but it clear that these efits were fake. Thus it is up to us to make our own judgments. The efits look like two people, on two different computer programs, and look like the Podestas (including the mole on Tony's forehead).
cky_stew ago
Thanks for the clarification dude.