I had a hunch from the very beginning that Milo Yiannopoulos was an agent of Soros/CIA and his rapid rise was the result of a vigorous sheep dipping operation.Title Here He may be an instigator figure playing one side of a conflict with paid protesters playing the other. It's classic GANG VS GANG psyop, folks. Lot's of effort by the MSM to give Milo high visibility were red flags to me. Berkeley opening it's doors and then closing them and the Police standing down as downtown was trashed by protesters seemed staged and suspicious. Lot's of interesting facts in his biography, too, including ties to locations popular with the Royal Family, Title Here, a Greek and a college drop out ( like Alefantis ) and exposure to elite circles and higher education.
Last week, the Kutcher dog and pony child trafficking show landed in Congress in a coordinated effort to flip the script on PG and the worldwide trafficking network it has exposed ( with some of the worst acting of Ashton's career on full display and that is saying something ). Last night, 60 minutes finally decided to cover the US Gymnastics scandal, which seems very late considering that story broke just as Pizzagate was being called 'fake news' ( why now?? ). Also, Dianne Feinstein is planning to submit guidelines on systematic child abuse/pedophilia, this week.
The signs are there that we will see LOTS of pedophilia stories in the MSM, going forward. I also predict PG researchers and concerned Americans familiar with the REAL story are not going to like what they read and hear because it will take the form of a ' limited hangout '. Title Here
I know this post is a high nail waiting to be hit by shills because of its controversial stance, but I challenge all downvoaters to provide comment, challenging my assertions.
view the rest of the comments →
starseedlover ago
I've wondered how Milo seems so resilient to criticism and seems to have balls of steel when confronting SJWs. Does he ever show vulnerability? When someone seems to be immune to criticism or overly confident in their "attacks" - this shows me he's got backing that take the heat off his own ego since he's not just representing himself.
Imagine a scenario when you're going to go to a protest and start trolling people or starting fights. Or you're going to protest and break windows and riot. You are a LOT more likely to do it if someone told you to do it or is paying you to do it. If you're just going alone, your own conscience "gets in the way." Just like people on the news, they can say outright lies because they are told to do it. Order followers.
It's like the Milgram Experiment where the people were much more likely to shock someone because a person of authority told them to do it.
Edit: Also, if he's "in character" this makes it a lot easier to not take any criticism personally. Like if you're acting or playing a role, then it's all fun and games. Like consensual BDSM where role playing helps one perform things on their lover without it being "personal."
starseedlover ago
I wrote more in-depth on this Reddit post