Former CIA Officer Robert David Steele Lays Out The Purple Revolution Plan (pizzagate)

submitted ago by DeathToMasons

Some of the info was already posted, but the Q and A at the bottom explains Trumps plan for pedogate, who is against him and what the stakes are. http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=66463

Sneak peek....Q. So PedoGate is real and “they” have to get Americans to disbelieve it? A. Let me explain how threatening PedoGate is… Who wins? Trump. Putin. Americans. Russians. The world…. Who loses? Israel, since they no longer can blackmail our politicians, the same goes for the CIA. The Shadow Government loses. But, the people win.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

VieBleu ago

Three days ago here I posted in a comment -

So I want to throw this out there for your consideration. I think when there was that definite buzz "Arrests Immanent" not just from VL but other sources too, that was law enforcement playing the internet a bit to rattle the targets, get them to act out. If you know you are guilty and you start seeing that message all over the internet, it works your nerves and that's when people make bad moves like moving or dumping assets, shredding files, selling off contraband cheap, etc...Because he has been a channel for good info, I think we have to keep in mind that their leaks might not serve our interests every time, but a bigger picture interest that they have. I have come to see the buzz created online within watchful communities as one of the weapons both sides are using against one another.>

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1653207/8084265

Above, we get this -

FBI Anon rattled their cages as other DHS and local authorities rounded up all sorts of street-level human traffickers. The big arrests will come in time, but first the small fish are interrogated, and provide information that leads to larger fish. FBI Anon was firing a shot across the bow, much like you shake a beehive to infuriate the bees.>

So I called it, which I think I should document as good analysis on a tricky subject that had everyone's attention for days.

Next I said, " I also think WorldCorp is some kind of psy-op, not sure which side."
The WorldCorp site and the Heavy Breathing videos share a similar trash aesthetic, and goal - to degrade the population and entrain it. If I had to come down on one side or another, I'd say the WorldCorp site, it's material, and the JP Father video, is black hat CIA. Or a mix of white hats leaking video from the black hat site. Which means I still really can't decide. It was pushed very very heavily. Who was pushing it/selling it to us?

VieBleu ago

Also notice this quote from the state of the nation article -

Notice how blatantly hostile McCain, Schumer, Graham, and others are? It was what we call a “targeted trigger“.

At the Special session that Kutcher spoke at, McCain insulted him in passing, saying he was better looking on tv (pedo comment?) and Kutcher responded by throwing an air kiss. Some here have seized on this as "proving" Kutcher is in bed with pedos. I firmly disagree. This was a "kiss my ass" response from an actor who is used to scrutiny and knows how to "kill" with kindness so to speak. I think Kutcher is firmly in the camp of actually taking down pedos. The shillery on this site is strong, and untrusted characters seem to pop up out of nowhere to constantly discredit anyone who lifts their head above the crowd to work on busting or spreading the word about pedogate - Kutcher, Seaman, RoseAnne even IsThisGameOfThrones.

Unless there is verifyable and directly connected evidence of wrongdoing, I think we should strongly support those who take a non-anonymous stance in our favor.

Phenomenonanon ago

I disagree. Here's why https://youtu.be/FVRJ0UuyHMo

VieBleu ago

Thanks for posting this - I definitely learned something.

First though I disagree with the poster for several reasons, and she does say right up front that this is just her opinion, so fair enough. This is just mine.

  1. She says the woman behind Kutchner "isn't trustworthy" with absolutely no cause.
  2. "I don't trust Kutchner." Your opinion is not enough to convince me of wrongdoing on his part. There are many people who don't like any person from Hollywood or the entire west coast for that matter. Or anyone that isn't a professed Christian, etc. This is not good enough or convincing to me.
  3. She tries to entrain the audience with - "you are going to instantly look past all he is doing" because she doesn't like him and is going to say negative things while showing his image. Still not convincing whatsoever and I am starting to really distrust this woman speaking.
  4. "It's more of a portrayal" "There is some moment to the truth then some stillness". Sorry this is just babble and not convincing whatsoever.
  5. Focus on the woman behind again. I don't care about her at all.
  6. AHH! Finally we get to something, and it has nothing to do with the sweet female voice on the video which by now I don't trust at all. Originally I watched a portion of this testimony but I did not watch it all. Kutcher says, "This spotlight was enabled by the McCain Institution (RED FLAG)...a man I find to be a WAR HERO (false information) John McCain.

Ok that's what makes me suspicious. The video OP could continue to do her somersaults of assertions and emotive "truths" and have no impact, but I didn't know Kutchner actually sent this valentine to McCain, besides the air kiss.

Yes, now I am suspicious. But the analysis on the video I am sorry to say is just an opinion, presented as entraining, and repels me.

A hard look at the McCain foundation is what is called for.