Yes, that is the mother's partner (not the father). His name is Abraham Christie. He'd only been on the scene for a few months and totally took control of their lives. He took the kids to Morocco where he inflicted all sorts of horrors on them from hitting the boy so hard he is partially deaf in one ear now, kicking them, holding his hand over their mouths so they couldn't breath, making them kneel while he poured water over them and hitting them with metal spoon.
The mother had also been reported before for leaving the children locked out on the balcony all day in their nightwear with no food or water.
There are a handful of people who absolutely will not question the story the children originally told (which Abraham made them memorise by using the above mentioned methods) even though the children admitted it was a lie and the real evidence backs this up.
There is no way the injuries the children had could have been inflicted by the father because they hadn't seen him for 3 months and all the recorded injuries were recent and healing, meaning that they were inflicted in the last few weeks. Nobody who supports this story will address this though because it would mean admitting they were conned by the real abuser. They will just attack anybody who questions the story instead.
view the rest of the comments →
norobotono ago
Yes, that is the mother's partner (not the father). His name is Abraham Christie. He'd only been on the scene for a few months and totally took control of their lives. He took the kids to Morocco where he inflicted all sorts of horrors on them from hitting the boy so hard he is partially deaf in one ear now, kicking them, holding his hand over their mouths so they couldn't breath, making them kneel while he poured water over them and hitting them with metal spoon.
The mother had also been reported before for leaving the children locked out on the balcony all day in their nightwear with no food or water.
There are a handful of people who absolutely will not question the story the children originally told (which Abraham made them memorise by using the above mentioned methods) even though the children admitted it was a lie and the real evidence backs this up.
There is no way the injuries the children had could have been inflicted by the father because they hadn't seen him for 3 months and all the recorded injuries were recent and healing, meaning that they were inflicted in the last few weeks. Nobody who supports this story will address this though because it would mean admitting they were conned by the real abuser. They will just attack anybody who questions the story instead.