I find it very hard to believe that JK Rowling is directly involved in child trafficking. These are the type of leaps of faith that the msm will use to make a complete mockery of legitimate research, it's a fucking butterfly get real people, I've read a lot about possible mod shillery which I've taken with a grain of salt but the fact that this post still exists is surely proof. What could this honestly achieve other than to get a couple of hundred million Harry potter fanatics to hate us/ troll us/ never believe us.
I don't agreee at all. It is not a butterfly, but a symbol in the same shape as one. Look again. And you think it is ok for child services to ignore known pedo symbols and use them as their logo?
I didn't say I think it's okay to ignore pedo symbols I said that this is counterproductive to the cause because it's tenuous at best and could alienate millions of people. If it so happened that this particular organization also had serious provable links to child trafficking or the Clintons like the elpida home then fair enough but this seems like a minor coincidence. If it turns out I'm wrong then fair enough but I never saw anything compelling enough in the op
Edit: actually on second inspection there is a link to Clintons, my bad lol.
view the rest of the comments →
Atatarkus ago
I find it very hard to believe that JK Rowling is directly involved in child trafficking. These are the type of leaps of faith that the msm will use to make a complete mockery of legitimate research, it's a fucking butterfly get real people, I've read a lot about possible mod shillery which I've taken with a grain of salt but the fact that this post still exists is surely proof. What could this honestly achieve other than to get a couple of hundred million Harry potter fanatics to hate us/ troll us/ never believe us.
DeathToMasons ago
I don't agreee at all. It is not a butterfly, but a symbol in the same shape as one. Look again. And you think it is ok for child services to ignore known pedo symbols and use them as their logo?
Atatarkus ago
I didn't say I think it's okay to ignore pedo symbols I said that this is counterproductive to the cause because it's tenuous at best and could alienate millions of people. If it so happened that this particular organization also had serious provable links to child trafficking or the Clintons like the elpida home then fair enough but this seems like a minor coincidence. If it turns out I'm wrong then fair enough but I never saw anything compelling enough in the op
Edit: actually on second inspection there is a link to Clintons, my bad lol.
DeathToMasons ago
No, we have to think critical. Your good..