I just read the article again, and must say I am seeing something now I didn't notice before. If you read just the bolded parts, it's literally saying:
the department itself is being hindered from doing good police work.
a local pizza restaurant in DC is operating as a front to make money on child prostitutes for politically connected individuals.
YES! And the other person noted the binary code. I didn't notice numbers. I just noticed it was illogical and wasn't written correctly to convey the emotion she was claiming to convey!
I am using she in regards to the story the mother told. The mother is the she. She is telling us "nothing to see here" in regards to Alefantis, making excuses for the chief...it's written as quotes of the mother. I'd have to have another go at it to suss who wrote it. Not bad, but far from foolin'.
I certainly didn't get any hint that the child had been sold. The article even says:
The daughter is still coping to this day.
It does twist the story about a police chief that originally protected pedos to one that is supposedly doing the right thing now and protecting those that have been "falsely" accused.
Yes, I know what she said. It is illogical to 1. accuse the Police Chief of fostering/protecting pedophiles and then 2. turn around and say yeah but nothing to see here.
If you saw The Tribe thread on here, mothers make their kids available to pedos all the time. Who's to say the mom isn't culpable for what happened to her kid. How does an 11 year old get out and away from home long enough and unsupervised enough for that to have happened? It's possible the child told someone, or was harmed too much and had to go to hospital and mom is playing innocent.
TWICE! How does that happen on 2 separate occasions? Your 11y/o is gang raped, then you let her out alone where she is raped again? Hint: don't be that parent!
I see your point, but I find it hard to believe the mother would still be making a big deal now if she was involved, much less not facing repercussions for flipping on the Johns.
It's shady as fuck. I see how cleverly it was written and why people might miss the clues..after all it was written to convince people "nothing to see here", but my job is seriously heavy in information analysis. I've saved companies millions by sussing out shit that sounds good but isn't.
Continuity in emotional attachment/expression is a massive clue to fraudulent information. Very few people can write to disguise their real intent or identity.
Being right 100% of the time when I call a company's attention to an issue in a document kind of gives me confidence here. If I'm uncertain about things, I'll usually wait it out until I have something to compare it with. With work I have no problem finding it straight off (I can even tell when one writer is trying to pass off the work of two different people as their own work) but with media stuff sometimes I have to wait it out.
The threads on here that have been flat out fake started coming out when the actual research was hitting hard. Then everyone ran off to the fake shit and that was that.
This article is designed to make the average reader believe that GOSH if this mom of a sexually abused child who believes the chief is a crook is standing up for Comet Ping Pong, then there must not be anything to see here. Sad thing is, it's not even a good try. I had it nailed by the third paragraph. At work no one ever questions me. I've proven myself countless times.
Far as I can tell, there have been no repercussions, the child was charged...yes yes...the men cleared..are they named publicly anywhere? It feels like a situation in which exposition was forced and manipulated rather than honest. Whom ever wrote that is not telling the truth. I can't build a plane, math, or engineer, spot patterns in chains, but this, it's what I'm good at. YAY I got something!
view the rest of the comments →
detcmon ago
I'm going to share the fuck out of this!
In_Cog_Nito ago
Careful, it's a slanted article that sides with the pedos.
LakeOfFire ago
It's against the pedos. Read between the lines.
In_Cog_Nito ago
I just read the article again, and must say I am seeing something now I didn't notice before. If you read just the bolded parts, it's literally saying:
MAGABoomer ago
YES! And the other person noted the binary code. I didn't notice numbers. I just noticed it was illogical and wasn't written correctly to convey the emotion she was claiming to convey!
In_Cog_Nito ago
There is no author listed, so how do you know the author is female?
MAGABoomer ago
I am using she in regards to the story the mother told. The mother is the she. She is telling us "nothing to see here" in regards to Alefantis, making excuses for the chief...it's written as quotes of the mother. I'd have to have another go at it to suss who wrote it. Not bad, but far from foolin'.
In_Cog_Nito ago
Gotcha.
MAGABoomer ago
OH FUCK...I assumed gender. Punish me.
In_Cog_Nito ago
lol, for the mother that is quite appropriate.
MAGABoomer ago
So it's not just me that noticed that. Maybe the mom sold her kid yes/no?
In_Cog_Nito ago
I certainly didn't get any hint that the child had been sold. The article even says:
It does twist the story about a police chief that originally protected pedos to one that is supposedly doing the right thing now and protecting those that have been "falsely" accused.
MAGABoomer ago
Yes, I know what she said. It is illogical to 1. accuse the Police Chief of fostering/protecting pedophiles and then 2. turn around and say yeah but nothing to see here.
If you saw The Tribe thread on here, mothers make their kids available to pedos all the time. Who's to say the mom isn't culpable for what happened to her kid. How does an 11 year old get out and away from home long enough and unsupervised enough for that to have happened? It's possible the child told someone, or was harmed too much and had to go to hospital and mom is playing innocent.
That whole article is illogical.
LadyMinx ago
TWICE! How does that happen on 2 separate occasions? Your 11y/o is gang raped, then you let her out alone where she is raped again? Hint: don't be that parent!
MAGABoomer ago
Yeah...there's a whole lot of hinky going on right there.
In_Cog_Nito ago
I see your point, but I find it hard to believe the mother would still be making a big deal now if she was involved, much less not facing repercussions for flipping on the Johns.
MAGABoomer ago
It's shady as fuck. I see how cleverly it was written and why people might miss the clues..after all it was written to convince people "nothing to see here", but my job is seriously heavy in information analysis. I've saved companies millions by sussing out shit that sounds good but isn't.
Continuity in emotional attachment/expression is a massive clue to fraudulent information. Very few people can write to disguise their real intent or identity.
Being right 100% of the time when I call a company's attention to an issue in a document kind of gives me confidence here. If I'm uncertain about things, I'll usually wait it out until I have something to compare it with. With work I have no problem finding it straight off (I can even tell when one writer is trying to pass off the work of two different people as their own work) but with media stuff sometimes I have to wait it out.
The threads on here that have been flat out fake started coming out when the actual research was hitting hard. Then everyone ran off to the fake shit and that was that.
This article is designed to make the average reader believe that GOSH if this mom of a sexually abused child who believes the chief is a crook is standing up for Comet Ping Pong, then there must not be anything to see here. Sad thing is, it's not even a good try. I had it nailed by the third paragraph. At work no one ever questions me. I've proven myself countless times.
Far as I can tell, there have been no repercussions, the child was charged...yes yes...the men cleared..are they named publicly anywhere? It feels like a situation in which exposition was forced and manipulated rather than honest. Whom ever wrote that is not telling the truth. I can't build a plane, math, or engineer, spot patterns in chains, but this, it's what I'm good at. YAY I got something!