If you don't know who David Seaman is, he's the self-appointed head spokesman of the Pizzagate movement. If you are a pizzagater, this association should make you very nervous, because David Seaman is a mentally unstable con man. Let's start with some background.
In 2007, Seaman began an internship with Jezebel. After only a few short months, he was so hated and reviled that Jezebel ran a hit piece on him, describing him as a "self-promotional whore" and then fired him. In the article, they publish a profile that Seaman had written about himself, which reveals the scary depths of his self-involved nature.
http://jezebel.com/270369/self-promotion-guru-david-seaman-totally-got-our-memo-shat-all-over-it
http://jezebel.com/274434/in-which-we-get-closure-with-self-promotional-whore-david-seaman
In 2008, Seaman wrote a book called, Dirty Little Secrets of Buzz: How to Attract Massive Attention for Your Business, Your Product, or Yourself. In this book, you can advice such as "Always be controversial and outrageous in everything you do" and "Enemies are more important than friends." You'll also learn interesting tidbits such as how he loves Bill Maher and Michael Moore, and hates Ann Coulter and Bill O'Reilly. This seems to be very contradictory, seeing as how he claims to be such a huge Donald Trump supporter. He also refers to himself as a "veteran promotional stunt planner," not a reporter or journalist. In the "About the Author" section, you'll find this info: Seaman is the founder of Shutterline Interactive, a vehicle for rapidly deploying new publicity stunts.
In August 2009, before the release of his book, Seaman claimed he would run naked through Times Square if his book didn't make the Top 100 list on Amazon. The book barely cracked the Top 200,000. He didn't follow through on the streaking promise. David Seaman has never met a promise that he didn't break.
http://www.adweek.com/digital/pewdiepies-downfall-shows-the-potential-dangers-of-social-influencer-marketing-for-brands/
Also in 2009, Seaman does an interview with Business Beat Live. In the interview he says, "I would protest gravity if I thought it was going to get me buzz".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SkEA0CbVWU0YouTube
Seaman calls Joe Rogan a liar. He claims that Rogan promised him a role as a political contributor on his podcast, but never followed through. Rogan's producer, Brian Redban, implies in a tweet that Seaman is mentally unwell.
In the same article, he talks a little bit about he holds a grudge against his family because "they didn't have my back when I needed it". Knowing his history, he probably tried to con them, just like everyone else he's ever met.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-seaman/what-happened-to-bitcoin_b_11410280.html
If you are familiar with Seaman's Youtube channel, then you're aware that he is constantly shilling for Bitcoin and Goldmoney. Here's some info on Goldmoney:
"Goldmoney Inc has its headquarters located in Toronto Canada and in Saint Helier Jersey.[6] The company is listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange and has a market capitalization of $312 million as of February 27, 2016. GoldMoney Inc. investors and backers include Eric Sprott, Albert D. Friedberg, George Soros, Adam Fleming, and Canadian Banks Canaccord Genuity."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GoldMoney
Yes that's right, one of the principle investors in Goldmoney is none other than George Soros! David Seaman can not claim ignorance on this subject either, because in an article on the Huffington Post he writes, "The company is funded by a number of savvy financial elites including precious metals entrepreneur Eric Sprott and the legendary Soros family."
For a guy who claims to hate pedophilia crimes and Hillary Clinton and John Podesta so much, why is he so proud to be associated with George Soros?
Also of note, Goldmoney paid for Seaman to attend this year's Super Bowl.
DavidSeaman recently won the #Supergold contest and got to go to the Super Bowl!
http://community.goldmoney.com/discussion/2581/david-seaman-bitgold-goldmoney
Seaman's constant praise of Bitcoin is also curious, considering in July of last year he had this to say about Bitcoin in another Huffington Post article:
"The trolls and narrowminded Bitcoin bagholders pushing Ethereum “Classic” on an unsuspecting public are not the ultimate reason I’m selling off much of my Bitcoin tonight - that’s just another indication to me that Bitcoin is in a weak position. Ultimately, however, my decision is grounded in economic self-interest. I see optimism and amazing ideas being built out in Ethereum, and I don’t see anything close to this level in Bitcoin at the moment. Shortly after I file this story, I’ll be selling off 80% of my personal Bitcoin holdings; or more accurately, converting them into Ether, on Coinbase."
So he's bullish on Bitcoin, yet sold off 80% of his holdings? This guy just can't stop contradicting himself.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-seaman/ethereum-classic-another_b_11173314.html
*In August of 2016, Seaman claims to have been fired from the Huffington Post for writing an article about Hillary's health. This is false, as he couldn't be fired, because he was never on the HuffPo payroll. He was a contributor and unpaid blogger and had his publishing rights revoked, he was not fired. There is not a single person who has corroborated his claim that he was "fired" because of his Hillary article. Judging by his employment history, it's just as likely he was "fired" for being a self-promoting asshole.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-29/huffingon-post-revoked-publishing-access-journalist-after-post-hillarys-healthits-or
CONTINUED IN COMMENTS
view the rest of the comments →
SmokinDave73 ago
While its a good thing to keep this as perspective because it is grounding that you can not simply trust someone so easily on the internet and I indeed agree with a lot of points you make in your post especially about certain contradicting issues of Seamen's past. The one thing that sticks out the most for me is that there are not very many people out there making videos and personally talking to people on camera about pizzagate and putting there asses on the line publicly.
It is concerning that David has made some questionable posts/decisions and tweets that does put in to question some of his motives and own agenda behind it all, but in the nature of this whole public investigation there are actually a lot of trolls and nasty people even paid shills/misnfo "bots" out there putting out disinformation and direct slander, defamation, threats, and attacks to not only him but many others in the community so its not surprising that he has been on the defensive lately and acting out of character on twitter a bit to much. He is only human and one can only take so much abuse until they start to waver which impacts on judgement and integrity.
I ask everyone openly this though, where are all the people making the awesome breakthroughs and putting in all the "work" they are anonymously posting on forums reddit/voat 4chan ect and expecting someone else to then get the information to a journalist or someone else to make a video about it. Its very easy to say this guy is a fraud(which I am not ruling out) whilst not actually stepping up and either making videos themselves or publicly protesting/handing in evidence to the FBI/Police departments themselves.
So while I am glad this information has been brought forward because I want justice just as much as everyone else does that has seen how terrible these crimes are, I would like to ask people not to dismiss someone that is sticking there neck out and being vocal about this when not many others will. I personally think Alex Jones and Joe Rogans podcast https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZPCp8SPfOMYouTube is one of the best "public service information" videos to date on pizzagate and other "conspiracys" and yet so many people in the pizzagate community still attack Alex Jones for many of the same reasons presented here. Alex is outspoken and is not afraid of talking about "fringe" subjects if they are the truth and he is a patriot to his county and wants the best for all of humanity.
cantsleepawink ago
Just want to say, I also think that it is good that there are people on the internet willing to put their face to a cause in order to get publicity for the corruption that we are uncovering. Those people are very necessary.
There is also another level of investigators who have chosen to remain anonymous (relatively) as that is also necessary for deep research and the ability to bring uncomfortable truths to the surface. Being anonymous is a choice that I personally made a long time ago because my personal skills lie in that deep research. I post on a number of different platforms, so my online footprint is fractured. Deliberately so.
It is healthy to discuss anyone's presence, but in a respectful manner. One thing a person learns when delving into dark corners is to question everything. Doing so is giving us traction as we learn the 'games' and strategies used to subvert grassroots movements. Questioning everything now is imperative as we have an opportunity now to uproot this particular tree and awaken people on a large scale.
SmokinDave73 ago
I agree whole heartedly there is a place for everyone in this investigation public or anonymous that is genuinely wanting the truth to get out there so we can save all those innocent people out there getting hurt by this. Unfortunately we do need to question so much because of the dark nature and constant cover ups of this subject but in a respectful unbiased manner like you said which the OP is lacking.