You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

DarkMath ago

Round House my boy,

You're reposting this again? It was already deleted. Your grudge against David Seaman does absolutely NOTHING to help us find evidence of a crime. Right?

You understand you look like a shill when you keep doing this right?

nowiknow ago

shut up bro. hes not saying pgate isnt real. it is.

hes saying that seaman is only about self-promo. takes research then says outrageous un-journalistic things and makes ppl look bad bc he claims to be the leader of pgate. if you have been following his meltdowns, you'd agree.

he has no composure and is a useful idiot at this point.

DarkMath ago

"hes not saying pgate isnt real. it is"......Ok fair enough. But let me ask you the following question which I've found is a reliable method of finding out whether someone is a shill or not:

Is it possible the Clinton Foundation committed any crimes in relation to the Haiti relief effort?

nowiknow ago

The fact that you're worried so much about ppl criticizing your hero worries me. Like I said pgate is real. Yes, its possible.

Even if I was a shill, I could still say yes. What a magical shill-dar you have there. smh

DarkMath ago

"criticizing your hero".......You could argue David is the most well known name aside from Ben Swann to follow pizzagate. Have you heard much from Ben Swann lately? No? Me neither.

David Seaman isn't owned by anyone other than his viewers. It's no accident we don't hear from Ben anymore but David is still putting stuff out. It means TPTB would LOVE to get David to shut the fuck up. David has about 80,000 views on some of his youtube videos. That's veeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeery dangerous.

You may not know much about math, I do. 80,000 can turn into 800,000 VERY quickly these days. Things go viral due to the message AND the mathematics. It's a tag team. I'll leave it up to you to figure out the rest.

;-)

DeathToMasons ago

Nope. He articulated very well what the problem with Seaman is and provided links to all his claims. It is important to distance ourselves from opportunist disinfo types, and that is what we are doing. This thread does not take away from the other threads we will visit and this needed to be said, so either shill for Seaman or leave people alone who are informing each other about a carpetbagger we need to avoid.

DarkMath ago

"need to avoid"......Ok fair enough. But let me ask you the following question which I've found is a reliable method of finding out whether someone is a shill or not:

Is it possible the Clinton Foundation committed any crimes in relation to the Haiti relief effort?

Vindicator ago

Hey DarkMath. He reposted it because I told him to after he removed the click-bait headline. The rest of the article meets the submission requirements. I get that people think this is a smear campaign. I think it helps us be objective to think critically about those who have evolved as "leaders" in the investigation. The way to deal with your concern is to refute what the OP is saying. Robust debate is exactly what we want, here! :-)

Forgetmenot ago

This seems like a post for pizzagate whatever. This is an investigative thread. People can robustly debate David seaman in that section. I have had 2 threads deleted, no problem there are other areas they belonged in. Also it is wasting time and sliding threads that are about exposing elite pedofiles.

CannuckBatman ago

This is a perfect example of what I mentioned above.

Assumption leads no where, but discussion and weighing the possibility of options leads to communication and discovery. In this case, to the 'Discovery' via 'Communication' had been the Voat community that allowed for 'Discussion', leading to truth.

This is not to point fingers at any one, and actually applies to anyone reading this; perfect example of what 5 minutes between one post and the next can do to affect 'truth' if you don't consider the grey areas of all of this.

Assume nothing, we can do this, we can win.

Forgetmenot ago

What are you talking about?

SilenceDoGood ago

i have my eyes on you vindicator

Azzipdoe ago

The only one looking like a shill here is you brudda

DarkMath ago

Really? Roundhouse posted the same exact article twice in about 30 minutes. As soon as the first got deleted he posted it again. I need a laugh, do you mind explaining why he did that?

CannuckBatman ago

How in the world are there people that found this forum, understand what investigating means, know about even the very concept of 'corruption', and are still unable to grasp the fact that there are threads being deleted that shouldn't be?

Either a MOD deleted the thread, which means a figure of authority oversaw public speech, which is exactly what this forum exists to question, though admittedly in the scope of pedophilia, or the author deleted it, and reposted it.

Can you explain how all of the above proof, and your conjecture, adds up to anything other you assuming something without providing a modicum of backup?

If you're not a shill, switch the attitude, because you're coming off as one right now.

stellarcorpse ago

maybe because he is correct and wants people to see the con man DS really is.