This is my first time making a post here, but I haven't seen this pointed out yet and need more opinions after noticing something from the 2nd "each day I grow some more" clip.
Here's the link to the video: https://twitter.com/suziedaud/status/831898824763379716 Just like to warn those that haven't seen them yet that they are disturbing. The children are very much being abused.
At the very beginning of the clip when it starts, he begins singing the Caillou theme song.
At 0:34 he starts with "You're just a kid who's four," which is the first line of the song but he changed "I'm" to "You're."
At 0:35 he says the next line of the song "Each day I grow some more"
Then this is where it gets weird, at 0:37 it sounds like he straight up says "I'm John Podesta" but pronounces Podesta not like one usually would but with the "a" in Podesta pronounced like it's said in day (maybe to rhyme with "each day"? I'm not sure). Saying "I'm John Podesta" kinda makes sense with the actual lyrics, too. The 4th line of the song is also a simple introductory statement, "I'm Caillou," and he might have just skipped the third "I like exploring" line.
Anyway, the main point of this post was to get others' opinions as to what he's saying at 0:37, because all I'm hearing is "I'm John Podesta" and I want to check my bias.
view the rest of the comments →
Wolftrail7272 ago
I thought honestly when I read that he says "I'm John Podest-" that it was too good to be true, but I think it really may be the case. He may be drunk or on drugs as well. One implication if this really is the case is that this evidence was leaked extremely purposely. It identifies him, and shows an indoctrination of a kid. Whoever leaked this has more...
8toborrm ago
It's my theory that if these videos are legit 100% Podesta @ CPP, they were leaked by rogue IC or FBI
My question then becomes: If this were proven to be in FBI's possession, and then leaked by "rogue" agent, does that fuck up the evidence gathering/evaluating/presenting process at all in prosecution?? Is it a mishandling of evidence?
Makingspace1 ago
it may or may not mess up the evidence chain but it is a bit irrelevant....because its now in the public domain and could probably be independently verified through voice analysis. Furthermore, it opens up another point of reference for other evidence to be mined. Take this video...couple it with the person of interest sketches of John and his brother, among other evidence and you would have to be mentally disabled to not make the connection. I agree with you on the reason it was leaked to ...see below.
8toborrm ago
Ok, gotcha. Appreciate the reply. WIll check out below.