Recall the Twilight Zone's "To Serve Humankind" -- about alien visitation -
the punch line was "It's a cookbook!"
The highest secret in this nation, above nuclear weapons/codes, seems to be ET's/UFO's.
At least that's the message that was given to President Jimmy Carter when he asked for the files.
Seems he had a visit from GHWBush, Director/CIA who told Carter that he didn't "have high enough security clearance" to see the files.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1956796
Listen, I'm not here to be a dick... But I'm here, and I'm a dick.
For future reference, I would suggest not using that example when trying to wake people up... It's extremely hard for people to take you seriously, when you say the DNC nominee for president eats babies... Regardless if it's true... But the thing is,we have zero evidence to suggest that is ture THAT VERY SPECIFIC EXAMPLE, has no specific evidence to support it. That's like the least proven example, with the least amount of facts to support it...
FORTUNATELY, There are SOOO many clear cut examples of the evil henious acts hillarys committeed...Some way worse than others, but almost all are horrible in any rational, decent persons eyes.. You could start small and set the scene in order to give future allegations more credence...
If you the main point you want to speak to, Is the satanic aspect (I don't recommend that, since there are much easier routes to go) That's fine... But you have to set the scene first. Provide the context needed so that when you do Drop the baby eating bomb... It's not immediately dismissed.
But If your main goal is to inform people of the evil that is is hilary clinton, I would steer clear from anything santanic, untill there is more concrete evidence to support it... And honestly, Even then, people will have a hard to listening. It's such an extreme example, that leading it with it, might actually stop people from listening to anything you say AFTER that, regardless if there's mountains of evidence to support it.
Obviosuly this is my opinion based on the people that I interact with...Perhaps the satanic aspect IS the way to go, if you're talking with religious people or what not.
Edit: Disclaimer: Shit internet, So I didn't even read the source I provided... I just typed it into google and Read what was provided in the search results...Sorry if it's shit.
Actually, I think people have to understand that there was NO Satan/Devil and no Heaven or Hell in the Old Religion which was based in Nature.
It is organized patriarchal religion - male supremacist religion -- which introduced Satan/Devil and Heaven and Hell and which underpins patriarchy.
That makes both organized patriarchal religion and patriarchy equally dependent on the other.
That is the source of this evil -- and it was based in violence of the Crusades -- "introducing the cross with the sword."
It included RCC's Satanic rituals, which according to some still exist and occurred on Vatican property.
**Royals, Vatican, global leaders entertain by killing kidnapped children?**
The Roman Catholic Church may have overseen the murder of over 50,000 Canadian native children at residential schools administered by nuns according to findings of a 2012-2013 ICLCJ Court verdict after which Pope Ratzinger resigned from office. The Protect Your Children Foundation claimed nuns stole 500,000 children in Catholic mother-baby homes in Australia and another 500,000 in Canada. Nuns were found to have tortured and abused 30,000 women in Ireland’s Magdalene Laundries, plus abused more than 30,000 children in Ireland Catholic residential schools.
Last month marks on the bones of nearly 796 children found in an Irish Roman Catholic Nun septic tank indicated they had been ritually killed. A source within the Irish Garda police force investigating the mass grave site, testified before the ICLCJ Court. Forensic experts had confirmed the decapitation and dismemberment of babies in the mass grave resembled the usual signs of ritualistic murder.
In Spain society remained shaken by allegations of the theft and trafficking of thousands of babies by nuns, priests and doctors up until the 1990s. There were 300,000 children kidnapped and sold for adoption by Roman Catholic Nuns. According to reports by the BBC, mothers were told their babies died and buried in mass graves. The Catholic Church was said to have made $20 billion dollars on the adoptions.
**According to a July 11 2013 Associated Press report in the New York Times, Pope Francis has declared it a crime for Vatican residents and workers to release negative information about the Vatican. Informants faced six months to eight years in prison and a €2,000 euro or $2,500 fine.**
http://humansarefree.com/2014/04/eyewitnesses-testify-pope-francis-raped.html
Any search will pull up information like this on the RCC/Vatican -- the Dutroux case in Belgium is but one example. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uCoqldzLJs&list=PLPQXCVoQ40INEVQXJoUZ7C2zHfRfn2hHS
In the Belgium case we also see the pattern where the public becomes very concerned and turns out into the streets when a trusted investigator is removed from the case. What seems to be a cover up investigation then occurs and simultaneously with that attacks on survivors of the pedophile ring ... until the public becomes totally confused and loses confidence in the witnesses.
I know. It frustrates me that people think they will somehow convince people with the baby-eating bomb.
Sales, people. It's sales and persuasion we need. If you want to sell people on pizzagate and Hillary's evilness, don't charge in with the baby-eating argument. How can people not realize how fucking outlandish that SOUNDS to normies? You have to bring that up after they have been redpilled.
It would be like trying to close a car sale because you really want to sell someone a JEEP but they are in the market for a Tractor. You don't start a sale at the CLOSE!
He didn't say to leave that out.
He's suggesting a rational way to actually persuade someone before dropping the baby bomb.
If you honestly think the best way to convince someone of pizzagate is to run around screaming Hillary eats babies, then that's great. But it's not going to work and will turn people away.
His comment was very cogent and I am upvoting.
good for you... but, I was half joking and of course, Hillary eating babies is not a starting point. As for convincing people this is real, I am doing a great job with my contemporaries and family members.
lol okay but a lot of folks actually get bent out of shape when I say not to lead with the baby-eating stuff. People often insist on trying to shove the redpill in whole even when it's bigger than the person's mouth...
view the rest of the comments →
gangpressorliber ago
I was telling everybody before the election that she eats babies and I wasn't joking... I just knew.
Votescam ago
Recall the Twilight Zone's "To Serve Humankind" -- about alien visitation - the punch line was "It's a cookbook!"
The highest secret in this nation, above nuclear weapons/codes, seems to be ET's/UFO's. At least that's the message that was given to President Jimmy Carter when he asked for the files. Seems he had a visit from GHWBush, Director/CIA who told Carter that he didn't "have high enough security clearance" to see the files. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x1956796
FuckUredditFuckuSpez ago
Listen, I'm not here to be a dick... But I'm here, and I'm a dick.
For future reference, I would suggest not using that example when trying to wake people up... It's extremely hard for people to take you seriously, when you say the DNC nominee for president eats babies... Regardless if it's true... But the thing is,we have zero evidence to suggest that is ture THAT VERY SPECIFIC EXAMPLE, has no specific evidence to support it. That's like the least proven example, with the least amount of facts to support it...
FORTUNATELY, There are SOOO many clear cut examples of the evil henious acts hillarys committeed...Some way worse than others, but almost all are horrible in any rational, decent persons eyes.. You could start small and set the scene in order to give future allegations more credence...
You have to use the CIA's technique of Predictive Programming Against them...
If you the main point you want to speak to, Is the satanic aspect (I don't recommend that, since there are much easier routes to go) That's fine... But you have to set the scene first. Provide the context needed so that when you do Drop the baby eating bomb... It's not immediately dismissed.
But If your main goal is to inform people of the evil that is is hilary clinton, I would steer clear from anything santanic, untill there is more concrete evidence to support it... And honestly, Even then, people will have a hard to listening. It's such an extreme example, that leading it with it, might actually stop people from listening to anything you say AFTER that, regardless if there's mountains of evidence to support it.
Obviosuly this is my opinion based on the people that I interact with...Perhaps the satanic aspect IS the way to go, if you're talking with religious people or what not.
Edit: Disclaimer: Shit internet, So I didn't even read the source I provided... I just typed it into google and Read what was provided in the search results...Sorry if it's shit.
Votescam ago
Actually, I think people have to understand that there was NO Satan/Devil and no Heaven or Hell in the Old Religion which was based in Nature.
It is organized patriarchal religion - male supremacist religion -- which introduced Satan/Devil and Heaven and Hell and which underpins patriarchy.
That makes both organized patriarchal religion and patriarchy equally dependent on the other.
That is the source of this evil -- and it was based in violence of the Crusades -- "introducing the cross with the sword."
It included RCC's Satanic rituals, which according to some still exist and occurred on Vatican property.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uCoqldzLJs&list=PLPQXCVoQ40INEVQXJoUZ7C2zHfRfn2hHS
justforthissubverse ago
I know. It frustrates me that people think they will somehow convince people with the baby-eating bomb. Sales, people. It's sales and persuasion we need. If you want to sell people on pizzagate and Hillary's evilness, don't charge in with the baby-eating argument. How can people not realize how fucking outlandish that SOUNDS to normies? You have to bring that up after they have been redpilled.
It would be like trying to close a car sale because you really want to sell someone a JEEP but they are in the market for a Tractor. You don't start a sale at the CLOSE!
remedy4reality ago
and leave out Marina Ambramovic ? Sorry, but HELL NO.
justforthissubverse ago
He didn't say to leave that out. He's suggesting a rational way to actually persuade someone before dropping the baby bomb. If you honestly think the best way to convince someone of pizzagate is to run around screaming Hillary eats babies, then that's great. But it's not going to work and will turn people away. His comment was very cogent and I am upvoting.
remedy4reality ago
good for you... but, I was half joking and of course, Hillary eating babies is not a starting point. As for convincing people this is real, I am doing a great job with my contemporaries and family members.
justforthissubverse ago
lol okay but a lot of folks actually get bent out of shape when I say not to lead with the baby-eating stuff. People often insist on trying to shove the redpill in whole even when it's bigger than the person's mouth...
concernedaboutitall ago
Hillary has Kuru! Tell them that, and tell them to google it.