Uncomfortable content on Voat (pizzagate)

submitted ago by mudbear

Yo, new poster here, just noticed something when googling voat so i could follow pizzagate, which was that one of the top 3 subforums was: (NSFW - apparently) https://voat.co/v/youngladies

If you havent been there, its mainly pictures of very young looking probably underage girls (look to be about 12 years on average), To me it seems to be a sharing network of young adolescent or younger girls in revealing clothing with NSFW tags, nothing illegal so far from what i have seen but to me its HIGHLY sketchy... If these girls are all underage, then we have a serious problem. With the hammer that has been brought down on pizzagate by the establishment, it would come as no surprise if they spent some meager effort in destroying voat by accusing it of being a nest for unsavory file sharing. I want this community to flourish and keep fighting the good fight, so i just wanted to warn about this part of voat that may compromise everything. If i were one of these establishment pedo creeps, id deal with pizzagate by flooding its home with perverts, all they need to shut this down is a little bit of CP and its done. Be wary of sharing a roof with this kind of content

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

FriesischShipping ago

What does this have to do with Pizzagate other than trying to limit our free speech here AND waste our time with something that mentions zero leads to catch perps?

mudbear ago

Sharing racy images of underage girls has nothing to do with free speech, and i believe certain things ought to be protected, particularly children.

Free speech is the ability to talk about things, not to actually do those things, if it were a board for people to talk about it, that would be one thing, but these people are engaging in swapping images, thats an action, not a thought and not speech, therefore it is outside of the protection of free speech.

This was related to pizzagate as voat has become the main point of discussion for pizzagate, and it features both anti pedophillia investigation right next to a pedophilic image sharing board. I was supsicious that this was some coordinated attack against pizzagate by promoting pedophillia on the site where this antipedophile investigation is centered.

Its not hard to see why i might think its relevant