You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

VieBleu ago

There is no evidence this is any particular person and to say it is one person is libelious. OP opens themselves up to be sued for what they are asserting IN THE HEADING ALONE WHICH CANNOT BE EDITED. IRRESPONSIBLE.

posting this stuff twice and acting innocent about it, smacks of an average, by they book shill operation, which is the definition of irresponsible.

Orlando_Kek_Follower ago

You can't be sued for saying that a video could POSSIBLY contain someone's voice.

VieBleu ago

Put your real name on it, see how it goes.

Orlando_Kek_Follower ago

And why, pray tell, would I do something like that?

VieBleu ago

since you are so sure you can't get sued for that, what's the harm? that is the point of the comment. Not sure what you are missing there.

Orlando_Kek_Follower ago

You still can't be sued for ALLEGING that someone could be featured in video footage. The statement "This is definitely John Podesta" is different than "Oh that could be John Podesta's voice."

VieBleu ago

I am not a lawyer, you may very well be completely right. It is irresponsible to put an individual's name, no matter how reviled with disturbing material and accuse them. This is shit stirring, trying to get violent comments, and discredit the forum. It is very clear to me.

And it is easy to sue in America. They COULD be sued for that, whether it would ultimately stick, not so sure you are completely correct. Internet bullying laws are still being written and changed every day. The PC climate right now is to protect individuals from "that sort of thing".