Was told to voat this, I posted to Reddit earlier:
So in one of the threads I saw someone had commented on the rumor that Robert Downey Jr allegedly went on CDAN and started dropping blind items on a few younger celebrities. I used to go onto OhNoTheyDidnt very often a few years ago and I can't find the original post about it; it was around 2009 and a lot of users on there started digging and brought up Room 23. It's a website/book with some odd pictures of celebs and users on there started to speculate it was basically a catalog that you could pick out certain celebs for insidious reasons. Here is a post from 2012 http://ohnotheydidnt.livejournal.com/67395829.html
In the original post, there were thousands of comments to dig through and one name kept popping up: Diana Jenkins. People speculated that she was basically a madam running a Hollywood sex ring. Here is her Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanela_Diana_Jenkins How interesting she donated to the Clinton Foundation and also started up a foundation in Haiti, although it was for hospitals and such but still, it's an odd coincidence. You can google around Room 23 and Diana Jenkins but most sites brushed it off as rumors but this has been floating around for quite some time!
view the rest of the comments →
smokemirrors ago
Been discussed a million times on here. Sanela Diane Jenkins is a Bosnian hooker who became a pimp and traffiks whores for dictators and children through her Haiti "trust"....
Book 23 was a hooker catalog.
WE KNOW.
sound_of_silence ago
just a reminder.. not everyone who comes here "already knows"... so, please keep in mind that voat is gaining readers daily... please don't discourage the good. ty.
smokemirrors ago
Its in your benefit to do a SEARCH first. Youre on Voat/Pizzagate, youre an 'outside the box' thinker, use that brain to think laterally.
We regulars are getting tired of seeing repetition. Possibly mods fault too, for not keeping track.
sound_of_silence ago
hi.. i know that and you know that but we have to be realistic.. new people just aren't necessarily going to know that... it's unfortunate pg voat can't be set up as a forum.. new posts on older topics is one of the trade-offs as a result..
where you're coming from is understandable.. but the best thing we (not just the "regulars" you mention) all can do is remain united on furthering the main goal of pg... rather than dismissing each other for posting in a less than perfect manner. thnx.
smokemirrors ago
I didn't say you were posting in a less than perfect manner; I said your post was repetitive.
sound_of_silence ago
okay.. i'm not the OP.. i'm just a new person that didn't know about this until reading the post... so, honestly, i'm glad OP didn't search before posting..
it seems like commenting links to the original(s) would be a good way to go in these situations.. so OP is supported and new readers and users are provided with more info on the stuff you "regulars" already know. :)
no repetition of posts would be perfect.. but probably not realistic as new readers and users increase... just a thought.
smokemirrors ago
Im with you sound_of_silence. Ok, apologies, don't mean to come off as harsh. Its just SO TEDIOUS having to read the same 'MAN CHECK THIS OUT!!!' type submission over and over. Yes, but agreed, unrealistic to expect newbies to know this. I just wish the mods would spend less time filtering off new legit submissions and more time getting rid of repetition.
sound_of_silence ago
agreed... glad OP didn't use that tactic... maybe the new voat categories (when they come out) will help with this pain point... here's to hoping.