Washington Waldorf School: VERIFIED Connection to Comet Ping Pong for Years (pizzagate)

submitted ago by FuckTheGlobalstElite

I began digging into WWS after watching the following YouTube video.

The video references an article exposing the occult/Luciferian practices of a Waldorf education.

It then proceeds to show that CPP is listed as a donor to the WWS.

I was unable to verify this; however, I was able to verify and expand on the video's evidence that Comet Ping Pong hosted an alumni reception for WWS on Dec. 22nd, 2016.

I began digging through the bulletins on the WWS site.

In doing so, I found bulletins that prove alumni receptions have been hosted at CPP on:

Dec. 19th, 2014

Dec. 18th, 2015

Dec. 22nd, 2016

The earliest the bulletins go back is 2014, but 3 years in a row undoubtedly proves a pattern. Perhaps WWS enjoyed the sadistic murals at CPP prior to their being painted over or perhaps JA himself is an alumni of WWS. Thus far, I have been unable to verify that, although I am still digging as that would make sense.

In reviewing the bulletins, investigating performers hired and other related organizations, I continue to see VERY creepy stuff, although no hard evidence of pedophilia (just crude satanic shit).

Thoughts? Is this worth continued investigation?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

ConcernedParent2 ago

A reminder that Waldorf schools are like a cult and believe in pure bloodlines and other mysticism:

http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2012/11/what-every-parent-should-know-about-steiner-waldorf-schools.html

http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2012/02/frome-steiner-academy-absurd-educational-quackery.html

http://www.quackometer.net/blog/2012/07/the-insidious-pervasiveness-of-the-cult-of-rudolf-steiner.html

And a note to the people who always show up to defend these and claim that all the mysticism is in "the past":

The picture I have painted is one of a secretive and, perhaps, dishonest organisation that does not disclose its origins, beliefs and goals to prospective parents of its schools. The Steiner movement has of course responded to similar criticisms in the past. What sort of arguments do they use?

The first type of argument is to suggest my concerns are historical – that they do not apply to the modern Steiner movement. If this is true, then I would simply ask where is the evidence for this? Such a shift in the anthroposophical movement would surely have been historically documented and debated. I find no reason to believe this has ever happened. I see no evolution in the organisation’s purpose, practices and beliefs.

YingYangMom ago

Well said.