There has been a LOT of movement this weekend, which is summarized here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/5savsy/breaking_report_pizzagate_pedo_crackdown_may_be/
This includes the return of FBIanon. And, having read the new (brief) FBIanon transcript, it sounds like the same FBI guys (Saudi/Israeli involvement, giant corruption through the federal government, etc.).
Well, all of a sudden, Wikileaks has tweeted out three (arguably four) cryptic tweets about "#vault7":
http://i.magaimg.net/img/1k5.png
Many people believe that these tweets relate to 9/11. For example, the third tweet says "When is #Vault7?" It shows a picture of a Whitney F119-PW-100 engine. Wikileaks also tweeted a video with an image of the 9/11 WTC crash and the text "friendly fire."
People are trying to decode these tweets over at r/conspiracy. But I believe that I have the best key to decoding them:
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/11/01/nyregion/a-nation-challenged-the-vault-below-ground-zero-silver-and-gold.html
Notice that the second "#vault7" tweet is about Nazi gold.
Among the many varieties of 9/11 conspiracy theories (which I became very informed in after #pizzagate and FBIanon in October), most of them observe that WTC6 (and WTC7?) had underground vaults with valuables that were raided.
Now, if we're on the right track here, it raises fascinating questions. Has WL turned into a conspiracy theory website? Why is WL sending out cryptic tweets? If they have the documents, why not just drop them?
Here's my theory: all of the #pizzagate activity, and the WL #vault7 tweets, are connected. FBIanon said that they hope and expect the arrests this week, but they are not guaranteed. FBIanon said that there is enormous pushback for them not to make arrests. Well, how can the FBI (and the good guys) push back?
Threaten to expose that 9/11 was an obvious false flag operation conducted by Mossad with the permission and knowledge of the neoconservatives in power during the Bush/Cheney administration, to essentially hijack the U.S. military for wars in the Middle East.
WL doesn't want to just drop the documents, because it would be hugely destabalizing, and could lead to war, even World War 3. That's what FBIanon said too. And this makes sense, because Israel is a nuclear power that reserves the right to the Sampson Option (nuclear bomb for Israeli self defense: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Samson_Option:_Israel%27s_Nuclear_Arsenal_and_American_Foreign_Policy)).
view the rest of the comments →
Bill_Murrays_Sandals ago
Thank goodness for Wikileaks to keep the pressure on
THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES ago
You don't necessarily need wikileaks:
It is extremely likely that only first responders died from radiation poisoning. This low reality death count (50-100 max) was necessary to get some of our intelligence agencies on board. Suspend your disbelief. The goal of 9/11 was to cover up Project Hammer and missing Pentagon dollars, and to pit the population with the most guns and largest military on Earth, with Islam (unambiguous religion that poses large threat to "their" slave society). Additionally, it served as a symbolic masonic event, with symbolism beyond my understanding.
Dmitri Khalezov is a go-to USSR nuclear worker/officer on the matter:
http://www.911thology.com/nexus1.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUnjbCxhXh4YouTube
Simon Shack (Italian computer graphics analyst) painstakingly runs you through the shitty "live" computer graphics.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gORu-68SHpEYouTube
Basically, CIA turned a blind eye to the Mossad:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68LUHa_-OlAYouTube
This fits into the whole masonic order owning the world thing: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1491256
gAvenger ago
Not only do the two towers invoke the Masonic pillars, but WTC had an unambiguous Masonic third pillar on the grounds. The symbolism of the pillars as the gate to the new world is unequivocal. Frightening really. The implication was that the towers were design with the intent that someday they would be brought down. Makes me wonder if the engineering was selected for controlled demolition in the first place- i.e.: strategic weak points built into the structure. These fuckers.
Votescam ago
No -- reports are the WTC towers were going to have to be brought down as they were put up -- with scaffolding which would have cost a huge amount of money. There's precedent for this as one of the NYC towers has been brought down this way. Unfortunately, I no longer have the info on that and couldn't turn it up in a search so probably difficult for you to believe -- but true. But, the WTC towers were to be brought down because of Asbestos problems -- they were also White Elephants which weren't renting. Heating and cooling the buildings were an immense problem. Demolition wasn't to be permitted.
The WTC towers were built to withstand not just one commercial jetliner flying into it but a number of them.
Notice that they've scrubbed references to "built to withstand a number of jets flying into them." And that's true as the designers made clear after 9/11 -- describing it as "flies flying into a screen door." WTC Towers Designed to Withstand Impact of Loaded Boeing 707
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9fQlC2AIWrY http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/design.html
gAvenger ago
I mean, they were secretly designed with a weak spot. I'm certain that the towers fell because of explosives internally at these weak spots.
Votescam ago
No -- that's completely untrue.
The WTC towers were designed to withstand more than one commercial jet fully loaded flying into it. The designers made clear that it would be like flies flying into a screen door. They had the example of the plane which flew into the Empire State Building and well knew that they WTC had to be extremely safe or they would not be rented or supported.
gAvenger ago
Yeah I mean, they designed it such that a very deliberate internal sabotage would make it fall in on itself.
Votescam ago
The WTC were built to withstand any number of commercial airliners flying into it. What brought the towers down was demolition and probably some other stuff -- possibly nuclear -- they were testing.
THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES ago
According to the Russian officer, they were intended to be brought down with nukes, when they were built. That's why it worked so well. It was the designed method.