The one with the Louise Bouregois sculpture that is an obvious reference to/play on an historical kook-science concept known as the "arch of hysteria" or "hysteria's arch"; the one created long before the Dahmer photos were ever made public. I have looked into the claims made here,
Your reading skills must be shit, I know you've been around long enough to know this has been discussed MANY times. Why would you lie/misrepresent if you're so certain you're right? Seems everyone against pizzagate are a bunch of pathological liars, OP included. Ive personally pushed #chickenlover as being the only code word that has been proven. Nobody really involved in this investigation would ever tell you the FBI released those words. The FBI released the symbols. The words were guesses on what the fuck they were talking about in some of the emails. You know all this, you've been around shilling long enough, you're just a liar.
You're full of shit. You know damn well that "food code" was all just guessing on what they were talking about, you just choose to push lies to further your agenda. Care to explain how you know the OP is a she? She's a memebr of your team and you just sold her out because you're horrible at what you do?
The whole thing is guessing. And these guesses have hardened into beliefs for many people.
Do you not know people still reference the food code all the time on this board? That it's still a part of the executive summary sticky post? That this is listed on the timeline of major events on the pizzagate wiki.
John Podesta is asked, "Do you think I’ll do better playing dominos on cheese than on pasta?"
I sold out OP? You're terrible at conjecture. Notice how you have gone from question --- How do I know OP is a she? --- to terrible guess. ----She's a member of your team and you just sold her out
No. She identified herself as a woman in one of her posts.
None of those places you named claim that the "food code" was anything other than investigative guess work. Yes, new people and shills still come to this forum and try to push that it's FBI code, they are misinformed or shilling. It's obvious what you're doing here.
What is a handkerchief that seems to be pizza related? If it was just a handkerchief left by someone why would it be necessary to contact people about it rather than just tossing it? Why do they randomly refer to food out of context if they arent speaking in code? Why #chickenlover? Why would James refer to himself as a chicken hawk? Why do you insist a citizen investigation is supposed to be able to provide a abused child when parts of the federal government are working hard to hide it? Don't believe the federal government is doing that? See the Franklin investigation and the finders. Why were their kids being pushed as "entertainment" in a pool party full of adults? Why was the same woman pimping her kid out on webcam? Why was there a little girl taped to a table on JA's instagram? Why do you insist repeatedly discussing the stuff you know isnt solid evidence instead of addressing the stuff that is. It's obvious they were speaking in code, that's where the guessing came in to figure out the code. This is standard investigation procedure. Why do you insist that it isnt?
Dude your argument against the food code contains several references to it.
All the stuff you mention is not "solid evidence." At least not of pedophilia, child trafficking, rape, murder, cannabalism and all the other fantasies people attached to it.
Without the food code = OMG, they are talking about SEX WITH KIDS! then none of the other stuff jumps out. "pimping her kids on webcam?" Ridiculous.
Only Chickenlover in list is plausible. The rest is a completely tendentious forcing of square evidence into your round hole. The hole only seems round because of the food code.
The definition of the words don't have to be the same for them to be talking about trafficking. Every last one of them could be completly different in meaning and some could be nothing. 99% of them could be nothing and the 1 word that is something could mean something completly different than the "food code". You're just too busy trying to create a strawman argument.
Not attempting to create a strawman. I think it's nonsense to pretend people are talking in code because you don't understand references in their emails.
It's called Arguing from Ignorance or Arguing from Incredulity. The idea that a vauge description that you don't understand of a handkerchief you have never seen must be code is very, very far from Occam's Razor
It's obvious they're speaking in code. It's ridiculous you think you can somehow change that. You've done nothing but push this code word strawman since you've got here. I've given you plenty of reasons why it doesn't matter and all you're doing is repeating yourself over and over, never answering any questions. Why are you trolling if you aren't a shill?
view the rest of the comments →
Antonius ago
Which of the Podesta bros. paid you to write this?
Sec137 ago
The one with the Louise Bouregois sculpture that is an obvious reference to/play on an historical kook-science concept known as the "arch of hysteria" or "hysteria's arch"; the one created long before the Dahmer photos were ever made public. I have looked into the claims made here,
AreWeSure ago
Folks here don't know who Louis Bourgeois is. Folks here didn't know what Tickets to the Whitney meant.
Another request, can you talk about the value of Instagram comments in a real investigation.
ThePuppetShow ago
Your reading skills must be shit, I know you've been around long enough to know this has been discussed MANY times. Why would you lie/misrepresent if you're so certain you're right? Seems everyone against pizzagate are a bunch of pathological liars, OP included. Ive personally pushed #chickenlover as being the only code word that has been proven. Nobody really involved in this investigation would ever tell you the FBI released those words. The FBI released the symbols. The words were guesses on what the fuck they were talking about in some of the emails. You know all this, you've been around shilling long enough, you're just a liar.
AreWeSure ago
This is a no true scotsman argument.
Obviously the food code was a giant part of the beginning of pizzagate. And it still is and it's still quoted on this board every day
ThePuppetShow ago
You're full of shit. You know damn well that "food code" was all just guessing on what they were talking about, you just choose to push lies to further your agenda. Care to explain how you know the OP is a she? She's a memebr of your team and you just sold her out because you're horrible at what you do?
AreWeSure ago
The whole thing is guessing. And these guesses have hardened into beliefs for many people.
Do you not know people still reference the food code all the time on this board? That it's still a part of the executive summary sticky post? That this is listed on the timeline of major events on the pizzagate wiki.
John Podesta is asked, "Do you think I’ll do better playing dominos on cheese than on pasta?"
I sold out OP? You're terrible at conjecture. Notice how you have gone from question --- How do I know OP is a she? --- to terrible guess. ----She's a member of your team and you just sold her out
No. She identified herself as a woman in one of her posts.
ThePuppetShow ago
None of those places you named claim that the "food code" was anything other than investigative guess work. Yes, new people and shills still come to this forum and try to push that it's FBI code, they are misinformed or shilling. It's obvious what you're doing here.
AreWeSure ago
The rest of all the other evidence is meaningless with the food code not being code.
How does this whole structure not collapse if you have zero evidence the podestas or alefantis are involved in child trafficking?
ThePuppetShow ago
What is a handkerchief that seems to be pizza related? If it was just a handkerchief left by someone why would it be necessary to contact people about it rather than just tossing it? Why do they randomly refer to food out of context if they arent speaking in code? Why #chickenlover? Why would James refer to himself as a chicken hawk? Why do you insist a citizen investigation is supposed to be able to provide a abused child when parts of the federal government are working hard to hide it? Don't believe the federal government is doing that? See the Franklin investigation and the finders. Why were their kids being pushed as "entertainment" in a pool party full of adults? Why was the same woman pimping her kid out on webcam? Why was there a little girl taped to a table on JA's instagram? Why do you insist repeatedly discussing the stuff you know isnt solid evidence instead of addressing the stuff that is. It's obvious they were speaking in code, that's where the guessing came in to figure out the code. This is standard investigation procedure. Why do you insist that it isnt?
AreWeSure ago
Dude your argument against the food code contains several references to it.
All the stuff you mention is not "solid evidence." At least not of pedophilia, child trafficking, rape, murder, cannabalism and all the other fantasies people attached to it.
Without the food code = OMG, they are talking about SEX WITH KIDS! then none of the other stuff jumps out. "pimping her kids on webcam?" Ridiculous.
Only Chickenlover in list is plausible. The rest is a completely tendentious forcing of square evidence into your round hole. The hole only seems round because of the food code.
ThePuppetShow ago
The definition of the words don't have to be the same for them to be talking about trafficking. Every last one of them could be completly different in meaning and some could be nothing. 99% of them could be nothing and the 1 word that is something could mean something completly different than the "food code". You're just too busy trying to create a strawman argument.
AreWeSure ago
Not attempting to create a strawman. I think it's nonsense to pretend people are talking in code because you don't understand references in their emails.
It's called Arguing from Ignorance or Arguing from Incredulity. The idea that a vauge description that you don't understand of a handkerchief you have never seen must be code is very, very far from Occam's Razor
ThePuppetShow ago
It's obvious they're speaking in code. It's ridiculous you think you can somehow change that. You've done nothing but push this code word strawman since you've got here. I've given you plenty of reasons why it doesn't matter and all you're doing is repeating yourself over and over, never answering any questions. Why are you trolling if you aren't a shill?
AreWeSure ago
I'm not trolling. I believe you are wrong.