I find it hard to argue against everything you've said except for the comment stating, "the idea that people are being paid to post negative things here / ridiculous", I can assure you there are paid posters not only on Voat but on every single populated board on the internet.
As an aside, curious to know what you would say of Sandy Hook. Real or Hoax?
There are people at the Bu with PTSD from what they saw in Connecticut, and there is nothing in Sandy Hook truth that can't be disproved. I am not at the teat of the establishment--I do what I do because since I was a kid I've been unable to tolerate injustice, my hero was Robin Hood--but there's nothing to the Sandy Hook stories. "Inconsitencies" and "proof" are easily explained. I'm not as immediately conversant with it though, i.e. my memory as to the specifics isn't great. As is obvious, I have a thing for reading about conspiracies. I read about that one long ago.
The "shills" being paid to post are evident when you know what you're looking for. I have baited several into conversation, then went a direction that could yield immediate response from someone not operating with a rule-book. However, in several instances I have seen a time frame of 1.5 hours for a response. Apparently that is the time frame involved in getting new initiative response from their superior/superiors.
A glaring realization of the SH event is the following (which gets deleted in many forums I post it within). The following is a post that I have copied to put out on as many channels as I can. It has even been deleted here on Voat, so don't expect it to stay long...
The SH production is the most censored event I've come across. I won't even type out the word because it will be automatically blocked from view. I will post this here, but it will probably get deleted or you won't be able to see it.
That is from a .gov website. It is not doctored and written in plain English.
Pay special attention to page 5 & 6. The "Rule of Construction" means "how to interpret this document".
RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit the Department of State or the Broadcasting Board of Governors from engaging in ANY MEDIUM OR FORM OF COMMUNICATION, either directly or indirectly, because a United States domestic audience is or may be thereby exposed to program material, or based on a presumption of such exposure.
Mass shootings (1982-2008) 42 mass shooting
Mass shootings starting Dec. 14 2011 to present - 22 (The day after this bill went into effect. See date at bottom of bill and know it takes exactly 7 months before a bill can be enacted. if you don't believe me, I will direct you to that information as well)
That is over a 430% increase in mass shootings in the last 3.5 years compared to the previous 30 years.
It's time to finally admit that something is absolutely not right here.
They are being done with actors. Hospitals, churches, police departments and others involved in areas these large scale, highly funded operations have been occurring.
I believe less is more when it comes to hoaxes. 90% of the event is filmed in a studio, then the other 10% takes place in the affected area. When people see squad cars and flashing lights and a few reporters, their memory of events will convince them the stuff they didn't see must have just been taking place somewhere beyond their field of observation.
That's why they always say there were 2 or more hospitals involved. Because when people at hospital 1 think, "Well, I didn't see any of those people" they will assume they were just at the other hospital.
When police say, "I've never seen that guy", they will assume he is with a different department or agency.
These are very concentrated efforts where maybe 30 people are taking the lead roles and making the other 100 or more people believe it's real. Then it gets put on TV and millions believe its real, with actual eye-witnesses testifying to it's authenticity even though they didn't actually see anything that would truly convince a skeptical viewer.
yep, and theater is not just done on the TV, although that opened to door to some powerful magic. For example, that nurse who testified before congress about Saddam's forces. She got up there and cried (Schumer tears) as she told of seeing his forces come into her hospital, stab pregnant women through the stomach and threw babies onto the floor. Several senators there for the scene helped with the act...the "news" aired it and the illusion was created...people believe it...and President Bush went on to use it as a primary talking point to con everyone into war to stop the atrocities....but the nurse wasn't a nurse....she a daughter of an Ambassador.....learning political theater, but never really been to Iraq. Witch craft.
view the rest of the comments →
Beaucephus ago
I find it hard to argue against everything you've said except for the comment stating, "the idea that people are being paid to post negative things here / ridiculous", I can assure you there are paid posters not only on Voat but on every single populated board on the internet.
As an aside, curious to know what you would say of Sandy Hook. Real or Hoax?
Sec137 ago
Do you have proof that people are being paid?
There are people at the Bu with PTSD from what they saw in Connecticut, and there is nothing in Sandy Hook truth that can't be disproved. I am not at the teat of the establishment--I do what I do because since I was a kid I've been unable to tolerate injustice, my hero was Robin Hood--but there's nothing to the Sandy Hook stories. "Inconsitencies" and "proof" are easily explained. I'm not as immediately conversant with it though, i.e. my memory as to the specifics isn't great. As is obvious, I have a thing for reading about conspiracies. I read about that one long ago.
Beaucephus ago
The "shills" being paid to post are evident when you know what you're looking for. I have baited several into conversation, then went a direction that could yield immediate response from someone not operating with a rule-book. However, in several instances I have seen a time frame of 1.5 hours for a response. Apparently that is the time frame involved in getting new initiative response from their superior/superiors.
A glaring realization of the SH event is the following (which gets deleted in many forums I post it within). The following is a post that I have copied to put out on as many channels as I can. It has even been deleted here on Voat, so don't expect it to stay long...
The SH production is the most censored event I've come across. I won't even type out the word because it will be automatically blocked from view. I will post this here, but it will probably get deleted or you won't be able to see it.
the fact is the media was given full privilege to create and distribute completely fabricated news. Here is the document: http://amendments-rules.house.gov/amendments/THORNB_024_xml514121456525652.pdf
That is from a .gov website. It is not doctored and written in plain English.
Pay special attention to page 5 & 6. The "Rule of Construction" means "how to interpret this document".
RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit the Department of State or the Broadcasting Board of Governors from engaging in ANY MEDIUM OR FORM OF COMMUNICATION, either directly or indirectly, because a United States domestic audience is or may be thereby exposed to program material, or based on a presumption of such exposure.
Mass shootings (1982-2008) 42 mass shooting Mass shootings starting Dec. 14 2011 to present - 22 (The day after this bill went into effect. See date at bottom of bill and know it takes exactly 7 months before a bill can be enacted. if you don't believe me, I will direct you to that information as well)
That is over a 430% increase in mass shootings in the last 3.5 years compared to the previous 30 years.
It's time to finally admit that something is absolutely not right here.
Source: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/12/mass-shootings-mother-jones-full-data?
Flat_Truth ago
They are being done with actors. Hospitals, churches, police departments and others involved in areas these large scale, highly funded operations have been occurring.
Beaucephus ago
I believe less is more when it comes to hoaxes. 90% of the event is filmed in a studio, then the other 10% takes place in the affected area. When people see squad cars and flashing lights and a few reporters, their memory of events will convince them the stuff they didn't see must have just been taking place somewhere beyond their field of observation.
That's why they always say there were 2 or more hospitals involved. Because when people at hospital 1 think, "Well, I didn't see any of those people" they will assume they were just at the other hospital.
When police say, "I've never seen that guy", they will assume he is with a different department or agency.
These are very concentrated efforts where maybe 30 people are taking the lead roles and making the other 100 or more people believe it's real. Then it gets put on TV and millions believe its real, with actual eye-witnesses testifying to it's authenticity even though they didn't actually see anything that would truly convince a skeptical viewer.
Flat_Truth ago
yep, and theater is not just done on the TV, although that opened to door to some powerful magic. For example, that nurse who testified before congress about Saddam's forces. She got up there and cried (Schumer tears) as she told of seeing his forces come into her hospital, stab pregnant women through the stomach and threw babies onto the floor. Several senators there for the scene helped with the act...the "news" aired it and the illusion was created...people believe it...and President Bush went on to use it as a primary talking point to con everyone into war to stop the atrocities....but the nurse wasn't a nurse....she a daughter of an Ambassador.....learning political theater, but never really been to Iraq. Witch craft.