You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

BarryOSeven ago

Did not read all of it because I consider something bullshit with claims like this

Just one question: How do you know there is no investigation? The rest is trivial.

Shills who use Occam's Razer to explain a conspiracy are libtard tier stupid. In a conspiracy you would find Occam's Razor and do something else because people like OP are going to apply it to explain.

iamthepizzanow ago

You not reading it makes your reply as baseless as your interpretation of the OP.

You call shill while looking like a shill yourself.

Put in some effort.

BarryOSeven ago

Try to answer it right here:

OP claims there is no investigation. I'm looking forward to the arguments in favor of the claim. I'm not interested in the rest of the bullshit.

The application of Occam's Razor is enough to decide to not poison the brain with the rest of the bullshit. The only people I have seen using it in tinfoil world were libtards or shills.

AreWeSure ago

Can you state your objection to Occam's Razor more clearly?

It reads like you don't like it because it used by people who disagree with you. Is that it basically?

BarryOSeven ago

I like Occam's Razor. But not in a conspiracy.

In science it's applicable because it's based on logic.

In a conspiracy you are working hard to make people think it's something else than it is. You would avoid the easiest solution at all times to avoid being caught, it's just how you should conspire.

If we would apply Occam's Razor to 9/11 it would still be Al Quada.

AreWeSure ago

If we would apply Occam's Razor to 9/11 it would still be Al Quada.

That is genius.