You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

@TheHolyGrail, let me get this straight. You have made a post here, where we are investigating real human trafficking, about Hitler and blood types? Providing zero evidence of any of the things you've mentioned here -- let alone any connection to Hillary, Podesta, Dyncorp, Epstein, the CF or CGI, Hastert or anything else that is part of the actual investigation. And you obviously know better, because you spent half of your posts begging not to be deleted. If you don't want to be deleted, follow the damn guidelines, post on-topic, and source what you claim. If you are claiming something scientific, it had better be sourced with scientific sources rather than conspiracy blogs. Removing per Rules 1 and 2.

sore_ass_losers ago

The Rh- discussion comes in through Madeleine McCann, who is said to be Rh-; her eye condition said to be related to Rh-.

Vindicator ago

"Is said to be" does not satisfy the evidence requirement for Rule 2. "Is said to be" = same practices that produce Fake News like Golden Showers. That bullshit only undermines the pizzagate investigation.

sore_ass_losers ago

Okay, I hope we can agree Madeleine McCann had or has a coloboma:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7256513.stm

I can't find any proof she was or is Rh- or that coloboma is related to the Rh factor. It would be interesting to find a McCann/coloboma/Rh- discussion and demand proof of these connections.

Just asked this on https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1538274 "Congenital Anomaly Register and Information Service (CARIS)".

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1538274/7935957

Vindicator ago

Fair enough. That is a good link to use. If there is a correlation between Rh- blood and the eye mutation, it should be out there in medical literature. Try searching pubMed. If you can connect those two, it would be enough to make a legit post tying all three together.

If you tie in a bunch of other people like Soros or #CarisJames girl without evidence, though, it will likely get removed. Keep the post rigorous, do the speculating in the comments. That goes especially for the headline -- it can't go leaping off into far-out click-baity conclusions. That screams "shill post" to mods.