James Alefantis requested removal of "proof" for death threats (pizzagate)

submitted ago by Ushil

It was re-uploaded by another user: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQP_cm6aWjQ

If you go to the description in that video, you can go to the Death Threat Video Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RqMMm52CWxE

It says: "the video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by James A. Alefantis"

At first I thought he messed around with the source code, but there isn't anything unique in the video which infringes copyright more than other videos. Now if mr. Alefantis visits Voat, which he probably does, I would like to ask him what the reason for this is? Maybe there is a rational explanation, but this looks very strange.

Ok, update, it seems like the message completely disappeared, but here is a screenshot from when it was still up: https://postimg.org/image/ufsn6qd37/

The screen turns white now, is that normal to happen after a while with copyright claims of Youtube videos?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

AreWeSure ago

I wonder if it's a different legal issue than copyright, but there system has hard coded a message with only the name field available to edit.

Calling someone a child rapist is libel per se which means he only has to show he has never been convicted of that to prove libel. My theory is all this "censorship" is companies taken down unprotected speech for which they could be liable. Libel is not free speech.

DarkMath ago

I hate to agree with AreWeSure but he's right. Nevertheless I'll ask AreWeSure if he's truly objective and ask him if somewhere in the 100 videos George Webb has done is there any evidence that Haiti was gang raped by the Clinton Foundation and/or DynCorp and/or the CIA. He'll either say no or he'll pretend he didn't get the message. Just watch:

https://www.youtube.com/user/georgwebb/videos

Is there any evidence in the George Webb videos that the Clinton Foundation and/or Dyncorp and/or the CIA gang raped Haiti?

;-)

AreWeSure ago

Just agree with me you don't have to be churlish about it.

crazimal ago

"churlish," huh? imma smack you with a bluebook if you use that word again, son,

AreWeSure ago

Pretty good word, huh?

That was my rewrite. I think my first version was come to come across as churlish on me.