You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

AreWeSure ago

The evidence you lay out seems to lead to a conclusion Halligen falsely produced the efits to damage a business competitor, but you don't reach this conclusion, You come to a different conclusion that Halligen had dirt on the Podestas. It seems like a logical leap. If he had dirt, then what? What did Halligan get out of this? Patton Boggs still ended up with declining business. There's a gap here.

smokemirrors ago

help fill it in. Im just asking questions. Im not concluding anything.

IPleadThe2nd ago

Are we sure doesn't help, ever. He/she just poo poos everything while contributing zero

smokemirrors ago

ugh, sounds like an a-hole boss I once had...