Assange does appear to be alive but if you think that's proven then maybe you're the one that isn't rational, there are glitches in several of the videos released of him since October that tend to lean toward them being faked. And the one with Hannity while it does appear to be the real assange he appears to be using a green screen and not in the room with hannity. Add to that the newer technology available to fake video on the fly using a real person and a video of another person (assange) you can in real time make it appear as though what person 1 was saying and their facial expressions were coming from person 2 (assange) so while it appears that he is alive it's certainly not actual proof. Actual proof would be him being seen in public and even then it could be an imposter. I think really he probably is either in protective custody, or under CIA control. For instance why would Wikileaks have re-tweeted yesterday a tweet from the democrats asking for FBI whistleblowers? Certainly Wikileaks doesn't think it's a good idea for FBI whistleblowers to go to the democrats to blow the whistle when there is the proven safe method (or at one time proven safe) of Wikileaks? It makes absolutely no sense. So let's be rational and say there is STILL a possibility that assange and Wikileaks are compromised.
Assange does appear to be alive but if you think that's proven then maybe you're the one that isn't rational
Then your standard of proof is him meeting you in real life. Which means you aren't rational. We've had a livestream of him, in addition to numerous interviews discussing current events. If that doesn't meet your standard of proof and you aren't getting your ass to the Ecuadorean embassy, then nothing will meet your standard of proof.
Follow through and you find numerous articles asserting his status as alive or dead, which was what was on so many minds from late October through the end of the year. That's why "proof of life" was the phrase regarding Assange for weeks. I don't know why you feel the need to lie about something that is easily provable. Your username makes me think you're here just to sow disinformation.
view the rest of the comments →
Phenomenonanon ago
If we've learned anything posting on social media does not = proof of life
madmanpg ago
Because Julian Assange hasn't proved to be alive yet?
If you believe that, you're not rational.
Fateswebb ago
Assange does appear to be alive but if you think that's proven then maybe you're the one that isn't rational, there are glitches in several of the videos released of him since October that tend to lean toward them being faked. And the one with Hannity while it does appear to be the real assange he appears to be using a green screen and not in the room with hannity. Add to that the newer technology available to fake video on the fly using a real person and a video of another person (assange) you can in real time make it appear as though what person 1 was saying and their facial expressions were coming from person 2 (assange) so while it appears that he is alive it's certainly not actual proof. Actual proof would be him being seen in public and even then it could be an imposter. I think really he probably is either in protective custody, or under CIA control. For instance why would Wikileaks have re-tweeted yesterday a tweet from the democrats asking for FBI whistleblowers? Certainly Wikileaks doesn't think it's a good idea for FBI whistleblowers to go to the democrats to blow the whistle when there is the proven safe method (or at one time proven safe) of Wikileaks? It makes absolutely no sense. So let's be rational and say there is STILL a possibility that assange and Wikileaks are compromised.
madmanpg ago
Then your standard of proof is him meeting you in real life. Which means you aren't rational. We've had a livestream of him, in addition to numerous interviews discussing current events. If that doesn't meet your standard of proof and you aren't getting your ass to the Ecuadorean embassy, then nothing will meet your standard of proof.
ababcb ago
Proof of life is a red herring. The real questions are whether or not he is free from duress and if Wikileaks has been compromised.
madmanpg ago
You're moving the goalposts.
ababcb ago
lol no I'm not. This discussion has always been about whether or not Assange was free from harm and at the embassy. You are now beating up a strawman.
madmanpg ago
You're flat-out lying. Here's a post right from this sub:
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1491567
Title: "If you think this audio file is proof Assange is alive, you're an idiot."
Type "Is Assange" into Google and guess what the first fill-in option is? "Is Assange Alive". https://www.google.com/#q=is+assange+alive
Follow through and you find numerous articles asserting his status as alive or dead, which was what was on so many minds from late October through the end of the year. That's why "proof of life" was the phrase regarding Assange for weeks. I don't know why you feel the need to lie about something that is easily provable. Your username makes me think you're here just to sow disinformation.