German political journalist and expert on Islam Udo Ulfkotte had once worked with big MSM (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung), later began to criticize MSM harshly, saying journalists are “bought” and coerced to lie.
When he died on January 13th at the age of only 56, I immediately looked at his social media profiles, but couldn’t find anything suspicious. Oh well, we don’t want to be paranoid, right? Yesterday, I stumbled over a piece he had written just recently. It looks like this had been his last article! In this article for the magazine Compact, he claims that little boys in Afghanistan are raped and often sold. One German politician is said to have been filmed participating in such an event. No name is given, but friends and I concluded it was probably Peter Struck, then Secretary of Defense, who died in 2012.
Ulfkotte died of a heart attack. Family says this had not been his first heart attack, so it is quite possible that his death has nothing to do with his work. On the other hand, the timing looks indeed suspicious …
Below the Google-translated text of aforementioned article. The translation is bad, of course, but I am sure you get the gist:
Pedo sex in Hindukush – German Army looks away
The lies with which politicians and journalists cover the issue of Afghanistan begin with the word Hindukush. The statement that there is peace and freedom to be defended there is scarcely to be surpassed in unscrupulousness anyway. The fact that "Hindu" stands for Hindus (the third-largest religion in the world) does not have to be explained for a long time. And "kusch" is the German version of the Persian word kosh, which is translated as "killing" or "expelling". Hinduism, therefore, stands on the Islamic side of the mountain massif from Afghanistan to Iran as a symbol of the place where the followers of Hinduism are gladly expelled or killed.
Bloody tits
Since the arrival of Western soldiers in Afghanistan in 2001, there has also been a German arrangement with regard to the adherents of the Afghan Hindu killing doctrine, according to which the provincials must be respected and also be looked away and not attacked by the widespread rape of small boys. It says that the NATO troops must know that it is customary in the country to rape young boys. Have you ever heard a word in our lead media?
Studies confirm, by the way, that many Afghans find it self-evident to have sex with small boys. All this takes place quite openly. Such contacts are made at night festivals known as "Knabenspiel" (“boys play”, called the "Bacha Bazi"). Since the German Bundestag approved the deployment of German soldiers in Afghanistan in December 2001, pedophile journalists and politicians are being rallied to join the "delegations" in the country where child rape is part of the cultural leisure time.
Since 2008, there are also serious reports from the United Nations, according to which Bacha Bazi is experiencing a new flowering in the sectors controlled by the German Army in northern Afghanistan. The boys must slip into girls' dresses and dance for the Afghan men. They are then raped by them. Bacha Bazi is a very natural thing to the North Afghan culture.
The small raped boys are also sold by the men. They are more ancient Islamic
Tradition a kind of war booty and completely without rights. They belong to the one who robbed the boys of a family. In the evening the men then abuse the children. According to a website that reported on these practices after a visit to the site: "Later in the night, when no one dances, the boys are often passed on to close friends for sexual favors. It is not uncommon for the boys to have a new owner at the end of the evening, as they are also sold and sold at such parties. Here is certainly the limit for enlightened multicultural tolerance. No doubt, this is sex slavery in its worst form: with children.
The distinction between homosexuality and pedophilia, which is so important in the West, is irrelevant here in Baglan. "There are several Afghan-German internet forums, which openly talk about this perverse child sex in the Afghan homeland. This has been known for a long time, but does not seem to interest anybody. It happens around the locations of German soldiers in northern Afghanistan. But the latter must look away - just like the drug trade. Otherwise, they could become the target of Afghan fighters more often. (...)
Politician is looking for fresh meat
German politics are closing their eyes when it comes to Bacha Bazi. Just why? Why on the one hand do you fight children's pornography in the Internet in Germany, but on the other hand you look away in hardcore children's rape in a country where German soldiers are stationed? So what is Afghanistan really about? The answer is quite simple and plausible: pedophile German politicians were the first to burn German soldiers in Afghanistan and to get to know the evening national custom at close range. A German politician who, on the margins of his regular military visit to Afghanistan, participated in the culturally widespread abuse of small boys, was filmed and extorted from Western intelligence circles. He had regularly traveled with Bacha Bazi to Afghanistan with two journalists, heavily subsidized by the German taxpayer. When he died a few years ago, he was accused in all the media, although politics and the media knew exactly what the man's shadow was.
Meanwhile, the risk for foreigners who want to participate in such child sex parties in Afghanistan, however, incalculable high - the visit of such an event can be fatal. Since 2016, the Taliban has been using such Bacha-Bazi children (or sex-child slaves) to infiltrate the Afghan army and foreign forces. When the French news agency AFP reported in June 2016 that in the Central Afghan province of Urusgan, each of the 370 official checkpoints between one and four Bacha-Bazi children were intercrossed for fast sex, and more and more of these children from the Taliban, in order to bring bombs and explosives to the proximity of foreign soldiers, as in Berlin's government, it was as if they were all new.
In the end, the question arises for the average reader why Afghanistan is one of the most popular destinations outside Europe for German top politicians and journalists. Between 40 and 60 times a year, delegations with state secretaries, ministers and deputies visit the country. Many of them do not go there, because it is so peaceful in Afghanistan or where you have important business to discuss. No, many of them are looking for child sex, and there is a directive to traveling media representatives to completely eliminate this particular topic. The New York Times did not. At the end of 2015, she reported that US soldiers were not allowed to intervene when they witnessed the rape of small boys. German media made it headlines like "US military should have tolerated misuse". Not a German journalist dared to report that this abuse is commonplace, even though German delegations travel to the country. This is not only disgusting, but also mendacious.
Link to article: https://www.compact-online.de/paedosex-am-hindukusch-bundeswehr-schaut-weg-von-udo-ulfkotte/
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts on Ulfkotte: http://www.globalresearch.ca/udo-ulfkotte-europes-courageous-journalism-voice-has-passed-away/5568629
English Wikipedia page on Ulfkotte (messy): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Udo_Ulfkotte
German Wikipedia page on Ulfkotte (comprehensive): https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Udo_Ulfkotte
(I wish I knew how to format submissions nicely!!!)
view the rest of the comments →
zoltan907 ago
I didn't have the chance to read shoosh's comment before it was deleted, but since it seems to have been about the Iraq war, I'd like to share something about that. About a month or so before 9/11, I read an article on the London "Times" website about how numerous foreign intelligence services had warned the U.S. that they had picked up information that Al Qaeda was planning to fly planes into buildings. According to the article, some terrorist cells were thought to be already in the U.S., taking flight lessons. A flight instructor from a school in Florida was quoted. Apparently, the White House had tightened security in April because it expected some kind of attack, but when an attack didn't happen, security was loosened again. At the time, I considered posting the article on Usenet, but I didn't, because I thought it might be seen as fear-mongering. I found it interesting that no one in the U.S. media was talking about it, considering that it was published in one of the world's major newspapers.
About a month later, the 9/11 attacks happened, and I was suspicious about how the Bush administration immediately started talking about Iraq and Saddam Hussain, when the article had stated that all of the intelligence agencies had warned Bush about Al Qaeda and Bin Laden. I wish I had thought to immediately retrieve that article, but I waited until years later to look for it, and by that time, the "Times" website was behind a paywall. I searched for pre-9/11 articles that mentioned Al Qaeda and planes, but couldn't find the one I was looking for. It occurred to me then that perhaps someone in the Blair government asked or told the "Times" to remove the article from its website because that article would likely contradict the "bad intelligence" claim, and Blair was one of the only world leaders to support the Iraq war.
When I last visited the "Times" website, I didn't even see a Search field. Is the Search function available only to subscribers? I doubt that the article is still available online. To find it, I would probably have to go to the university library and browse through their microfilm.