i find it weird that people who believe (in my eyes) even more incredible shit, think this is impossible. those pictures look EXACTLY like the podesta brothers.
people have said those two sketches were supposed to be of the same suspect -- how? they look totally different.
THE PODESTA EMAILS START THE DAY AFTER MCCANN WENT MISSING
I have a simple explanation for varied witness accounts of the 'man' seen with Madeline: John and Tony RELAYED the abduction to create confusion. They both carried/escorted her at different points and at different places. There ya go. Occams Razor. I firmly believe there is prima facie evidence right now to bring both Podesta's in for questioning on the McCann abduction. This has been a central point since the inception of PG and if it was so easy for the Podesta's to discredit the connection, why have they not done it? They don't want the McCann case back in the news, trust me. And they certainly don't want the World to see their faces next to those computer generated renderings.
Also there is no particular reason to believe the witnesses' stories in detail. There is some evidence the podestas were there, and the images are clearly a match, regardless of who created them or when. I would not really buy the tale of who the efit artist was, since it is obvious the efits were made from photos of the brothers podesta, not witness descriptions from memory. Do remember the McCann press coverage was sketchy from day one. No reason to consider it gospel years after when efits appeared.
Ever seen efits before? They really don't often look exactly like anyone at all but may catch skin tone or distinguishing marks or facial geometry.
Rarely do they match clear frontal photos of investigative subjects. When they do it is because they are engagements of photos or surveillance video, not sketches or true "efit" electronic composites.
And the mole on wrong side? That is just so there can be no lawsuit claiming they used a
likeness of Tony to defame him.
view the rest of the comments →
gerrycan ago
This is total BULLSHIT and discredits us no end.
google_is_useful ago
i find it weird that people who believe (in my eyes) even more incredible shit, think this is impossible. those pictures look EXACTLY like the podesta brothers.
people have said those two sketches were supposed to be of the same suspect -- how? they look totally different.
THE PODESTA EMAILS START THE DAY AFTER MCCANN WENT MISSING
how can you dismiss this entirely?
remedy4reality ago
I have a simple explanation for varied witness accounts of the 'man' seen with Madeline: John and Tony RELAYED the abduction to create confusion. They both carried/escorted her at different points and at different places. There ya go. Occams Razor. I firmly believe there is prima facie evidence right now to bring both Podesta's in for questioning on the McCann abduction. This has been a central point since the inception of PG and if it was so easy for the Podesta's to discredit the connection, why have they not done it? They don't want the McCann case back in the news, trust me. And they certainly don't want the World to see their faces next to those computer generated renderings.
crazimal ago
Also there is no particular reason to believe the witnesses' stories in detail. There is some evidence the podestas were there, and the images are clearly a match, regardless of who created them or when. I would not really buy the tale of who the efit artist was, since it is obvious the efits were made from photos of the brothers podesta, not witness descriptions from memory. Do remember the McCann press coverage was sketchy from day one. No reason to consider it gospel years after when efits appeared.
Ever seen efits before? They really don't often look exactly like anyone at all but may catch skin tone or distinguishing marks or facial geometry.
Rarely do they match clear frontal photos of investigative subjects. When they do it is because they are engagements of photos or surveillance video, not sketches or true "efit" electronic composites.
And the mole on wrong side? That is just so there can be no lawsuit claiming they used a likeness of Tony to defame him.
It's them for sure.